Consider the following scenario:
.ndo_bpf() | ice_prepare_for_reset() |
________________________|_______________________________________|
rtnl_lock() | |
ice_down() | |
| test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN) - true |
| ice_dis_vsi() returns |
ice_up() | |
| proceeds to rebuild a running VSI |
.ndo_bpf() is not the only rtnl-locked callback that toggles the interface
to apply new configuration. Another example is .set_channels().
To avoid the race condition above, act only after reading ICE_VSI_DOWN
under rtnl_lock.
Fixes: 0f9d5027a749 ("ice: Refactor VSI allocation, deletion and rebuild flow")
Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
index f9852f1a136e..b773078ad81a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
@@ -2665,8 +2665,7 @@ int ice_ena_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, bool locked)
*/
void ice_dis_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, bool locked)
{
- if (test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state))
- return;
+ bool already_down = test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state);
set_bit(ICE_VSI_NEEDS_RESTART, vsi->state);
@@ -2674,15 +2673,16 @@ void ice_dis_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, bool locked)
if (netif_running(vsi->netdev)) {
if (!locked)
rtnl_lock();
-
- ice_vsi_close(vsi);
+ already_down = test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state);
+ if (!already_down)
+ ice_vsi_close(vsi);
if (!locked)
rtnl_unlock();
- } else {
+ } else if (!already_down) {
ice_vsi_close(vsi);
}
- } else if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_CTRL) {
+ } else if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_CTRL && !already_down) {
ice_vsi_close(vsi);
}
}
--
2.43.0
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of
>Zaremba, Larysa
>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 10:19 PM
>To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
>Cc: Drewek, Wojciech <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>; Fijalkowski, Maciej
><maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>;
>Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>; Zaremba, Larysa
><larysa.zaremba@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; John Fastabend
><john.fastabend@gmail.com>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>; linux-
>kernel@vger.kernel.org; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Kubiak,
>Michal <michal.kubiak@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
><anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; Nambiar, Amritha
><amritha.nambiar@intel.com>; Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>;
>Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; bpf@vger.kernel.org; Paolo Abeni
><pabeni@redhat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Karlsson,
>Magnus <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
>Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v2 4/6] ice: check ICE_VSI_DOWN
>under rtnl_lock when preparing for reset
>
>Consider the following scenario:
>
>.ndo_bpf() | ice_prepare_for_reset() |
>________________________|_______________________________________|
>rtnl_lock() | |
>ice_down() | |
> | test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN) - true |
> | ice_dis_vsi() returns |
>ice_up() | |
> | proceeds to rebuild a running VSI |
>
>.ndo_bpf() is not the only rtnl-locked callback that toggles the interface to apply
>new configuration. Another example is .set_channels().
>
>To avoid the race condition above, act only after reading ICE_VSI_DOWN under
>rtnl_lock.
>
>Fixes: 0f9d5027a749 ("ice: Refactor VSI allocation, deletion and rebuild flow")
>Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Chandan Kumar Rout <chandanx.rout@intel.com> (A Contingent Worker at Intel)
On 7/24/2024 9:48 AM, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> Consider the following scenario:
>
> .ndo_bpf() | ice_prepare_for_reset() |
> ________________________|_______________________________________|
> rtnl_lock() | |
> ice_down() | |
> | test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN) - true |
> | ice_dis_vsi() returns |
> ice_up() | |
> | proceeds to rebuild a running VSI |
>
> .ndo_bpf() is not the only rtnl-locked callback that toggles the interface
> to apply new configuration. Another example is .set_channels().
>
> To avoid the race condition above, act only after reading ICE_VSI_DOWN
> under rtnl_lock.
>
> Fixes: 0f9d5027a749 ("ice: Refactor VSI allocation, deletion and rebuild flow")
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> index f9852f1a136e..b773078ad81a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> @@ -2665,8 +2665,7 @@ int ice_ena_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, bool locked)
> */
> void ice_dis_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, bool locked)
> {
> - if (test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state))
> - return;
> + bool already_down = test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state);
>
Do we need to initialize already_down? I guess its because the other
initialization happens inside the conditional which may not be executed
in every flow. Ok.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> set_bit(ICE_VSI_NEEDS_RESTART, vsi->state);
>
> @@ -2674,15 +2673,16 @@ void ice_dis_vsi(struct ice_vsi *vsi, bool locked)
> if (netif_running(vsi->netdev)) {
> if (!locked)
> rtnl_lock();
> -
> - ice_vsi_close(vsi);
> + already_down = test_bit(ICE_VSI_DOWN, vsi->state);
> + if (!already_down)
> + ice_vsi_close(vsi);
>
> if (!locked)
> rtnl_unlock();
> - } else {
> + } else if (!already_down) {
> ice_vsi_close(vsi);
> }
> - } else if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_CTRL) {
> + } else if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_CTRL && !already_down) {
> ice_vsi_close(vsi);
> }
> }
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.