Hi Jens,

These two patches have been reviewed but have not been merged into
linux-next. Can they be merged into 6.11?

Thanks,

v3:
- rebased to the latest linux-next branch;
- put the separate patch2 in this patchset;
- add reviewed-by tag.

v2:
- rewrite the patch.

Haoqian He (1):
  scsi: sd: remove some redundant initialization code

Li Feng (1):
  scsi: sd: Keep the discard mode stable

 drivers/scsi/sd.c | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.2

On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:07:21 +0800, Li Feng wrote:

> These two patches have been reviewed but have not been merged into
> linux-next. Can they be merged into 6.11?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> v3:
> - rebased to the latest linux-next branch;
> - put the separate patch2 in this patchset;
> - add reviewed-by tag.
> 
> [...]

Applied to 6.11/scsi-fixes, thanks!

[1/2] scsi: sd: Keep the discard mode stable
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/f874d7210d88

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

On 7/18/24 2:07 AM, Li Feng wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> These two patches have been reviewed but have not been merged into
> linux-next. Can they be merged into 6.11?

They can, but is there some dependency that means they should go
through the block tree? Would seem more logical that Martin picked
them up.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Jens,

> They can, but is there some dependency that means they should go
> through the block tree? Would seem more logical that Martin picked
> them up.

I'll get to them. Busy with a couple of hardware-related regressions
right now.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

On 7/22/24 5:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Jens,
> 
>> They can, but is there some dependency that means they should go
>> through the block tree? Would seem more logical that Martin picked
>> them up.
> 
> I'll get to them. Busy with a couple of hardware-related regressions
> right now.

All good, just wanted to ensure they weren't waiting on me, as the
cover letter seemed to indicate.

Thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe

Hi Jens and Martin,

Thank you. 
I was worried that you were too busy and forgot about these two patches.

> 2024年7月23日 08:37，Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> 写道：
> 
> On 7/22/24 5:55 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> 
>> Jens,
>> 
>>> They can, but is there some dependency that means they should go
>>> through the block tree? Would seem more logical that Martin picked
>>> them up.
>> 
>> I'll get to them. Busy with a couple of hardware-related regressions
>> right now.
> 
> All good, just wanted to ensure they weren't waiting on me, as the
> cover letter seemed to indicate.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 
>