Add tracking of initial statistics
Signed-off-by: Luke Parkin <luke.parkin@arm.com>
---
V2->V3
Add more statistics
Use new log_stats method.
V1->V2
Drop unneccesary atomic_set's
Use new 'scmi_log_stats' to simplify incrementing of atomics
Move scmi_log_stats to locations which mean no extra conditionals
are needed
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 6edec6ec912d..b22f104cda36 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -126,6 +126,20 @@ struct scmi_debug_info {
};
enum debug_stat_counters {
+ SENT_OK,
+ SENT_FAIL,
+ SENT_FAIL_POLLING_UNSUPPORTED,
+ SENT_FAIL_CHANNEL_NOT_FOUND,
+ RESPONSE_OK,
+ NOTIF_OK,
+ DLYD_RESPONSE_OK,
+ XFERS_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT,
+ XFERS_RESPONSE_POLLED_TIMEOUT,
+ RESPONSE_POLLED_OK,
+ ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED,
+ ERR_MSG_INVALID,
+ ERR_MSG_NOMEM,
+ ERR_PROTOCOL,
LAST
};
@@ -994,6 +1008,7 @@ scmi_xfer_command_acquire(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
scmi_bad_message_trace(cinfo, msg_hdr, MSG_UNEXPECTED);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED);
return xfer;
}
@@ -1021,6 +1036,8 @@ scmi_xfer_command_acquire(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
msg_type, xfer_id, msg_hdr, xfer->state);
scmi_bad_message_trace(cinfo, msg_hdr, MSG_INVALID);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, ERR_MSG_INVALID);
+
/* On error the refcount incremented above has to be dropped */
__scmi_xfer_put(minfo, xfer);
@@ -1060,6 +1077,7 @@ static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
PTR_ERR(xfer));
scmi_bad_message_trace(cinfo, msg_hdr, MSG_NOMEM);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, ERR_MSG_NOMEM);
scmi_clear_channel(info, cinfo);
return;
@@ -1075,6 +1093,7 @@ static void scmi_handle_notification(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
trace_scmi_msg_dump(info->id, cinfo->id, xfer->hdr.protocol_id,
xfer->hdr.id, "NOTI", xfer->hdr.seq,
xfer->hdr.status, xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, NOTIF_OK);
scmi_notify(cinfo->handle, xfer->hdr.protocol_id,
xfer->hdr.id, xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len, ts);
@@ -1134,8 +1153,10 @@ static void scmi_handle_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
if (xfer->hdr.type == MSG_TYPE_DELAYED_RESP) {
scmi_clear_channel(info, cinfo);
complete(xfer->async_done);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, DLYD_RESPONSE_OK);
} else {
complete(&xfer->done);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, RESPONSE_OK);
}
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_RAW_MODE_SUPPORT)) {
@@ -1219,6 +1240,7 @@ static int scmi_wait_for_reply(struct device *dev, const struct scmi_desc *desc,
struct scmi_xfer *xfer, unsigned int timeout_ms)
{
int ret = 0;
+ struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle);
if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion) {
/*
@@ -1239,13 +1261,12 @@ static int scmi_wait_for_reply(struct device *dev, const struct scmi_desc *desc,
"timed out in resp(caller: %pS) - polling\n",
(void *)_RET_IP_);
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, XFERS_RESPONSE_POLLED_TIMEOUT);
}
}
if (!ret) {
unsigned long flags;
- struct scmi_info *info =
- handle_to_scmi_info(cinfo->handle);
/*
* Do not fetch_response if an out-of-order delayed
@@ -1265,6 +1286,7 @@ static int scmi_wait_for_reply(struct device *dev, const struct scmi_desc *desc,
"RESP" : "resp",
xfer->hdr.seq, xfer->hdr.status,
xfer->rx.buf, xfer->rx.len);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, RESPONSE_POLLED_OK);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_RAW_MODE_SUPPORT)) {
scmi_raw_message_report(info->raw, xfer,
@@ -1279,6 +1301,7 @@ static int scmi_wait_for_reply(struct device *dev, const struct scmi_desc *desc,
dev_err(dev, "timed out in resp(caller: %pS)\n",
(void *)_RET_IP_);
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, XFERS_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT);
}
}
@@ -1362,13 +1385,15 @@ static int do_xfer(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
!is_transport_polling_capable(info->desc)) {
dev_warn_once(dev,
"Polling mode is not supported by transport.\n");
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, SENT_FAIL_POLLING_UNSUPPORTED);
return -EINVAL;
}
cinfo = idr_find(&info->tx_idr, pi->proto->id);
- if (unlikely(!cinfo))
+ if (unlikely(!cinfo)) {
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, SENT_FAIL_CHANNEL_NOT_FOUND);
return -EINVAL;
-
+ }
/* True ONLY if also supported by transport. */
if (is_polling_enabled(cinfo, info->desc))
xfer->hdr.poll_completion = true;
@@ -1400,16 +1425,20 @@ static int do_xfer(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
ret = info->desc->ops->send_message(cinfo, xfer);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to send message %d\n", ret);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, SENT_FAIL);
return ret;
}
trace_scmi_msg_dump(info->id, cinfo->id, xfer->hdr.protocol_id,
xfer->hdr.id, "CMND", xfer->hdr.seq,
xfer->hdr.status, xfer->tx.buf, xfer->tx.len);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, SENT_OK);
ret = scmi_wait_for_message_response(cinfo, xfer);
- if (!ret && xfer->hdr.status)
+ if (!ret && xfer->hdr.status) {
ret = scmi_to_linux_errno(xfer->hdr.status);
+ scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, ERR_PROTOCOL);
+ }
if (info->desc->ops->mark_txdone)
info->desc->ops->mark_txdone(cinfo, ret, xfer);
--
2.34.1
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:37:49PM +0100, Luke Parkin wrote:
> Add tracking of initial statistics
>
> Signed-off-by: Luke Parkin <luke.parkin@arm.com>
> ---
> V2->V3
> Add more statistics
> Use new log_stats method.
> V1->V2
> Drop unneccesary atomic_set's
> Use new 'scmi_log_stats' to simplify incrementing of atomics
> Move scmi_log_stats to locations which mean no extra conditionals
> are needed
> ---
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> index 6edec6ec912d..b22f104cda36 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,20 @@ struct scmi_debug_info {
> };
>
> enum debug_stat_counters {
> + SENT_OK,
> + SENT_FAIL,
> + SENT_FAIL_POLLING_UNSUPPORTED,
> + SENT_FAIL_CHANNEL_NOT_FOUND,
> + RESPONSE_OK,
> + NOTIF_OK,
> + DLYD_RESPONSE_OK,
> + XFERS_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT,
> + XFERS_RESPONSE_POLLED_TIMEOUT,
> + RESPONSE_POLLED_OK,
> + ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED,
> + ERR_MSG_INVALID,
> + ERR_MSG_NOMEM,
> + ERR_PROTOCOL,
> LAST
> };
>
> @@ -994,6 +1008,7 @@ scmi_xfer_command_acquire(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags);
>
> scmi_bad_message_trace(cinfo, msg_hdr, MSG_UNEXPECTED);
> + scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED);
I'd be tempted to say why dont you wrap these scmi_log_stats() inside the
scmi_bad_message_trace() ... BUT in order to avoid an additional
conditional inside the scmi_bad_message_trace() you will need to somehow
remap the MSG_UNEXPECTED to ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED inside scmi_bad_message_trace (lets say
with a local onstack array indexed by -err)...AND that would mean committing to keep
such mapping in-sync with the the above enum, so as to avoid that adding
a new definition into scmi_bad_msg BUT not to debug_stat_counters will
end up in a buffer overflow....so at the end probably better/safer to keep it
this way...
Thanks,
Cristian
>> @@ -994,6 +1008,7 @@ scmi_xfer_command_acquire(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, u32 msg_hdr) >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags); >> >> scmi_bad_message_trace(cinfo, msg_hdr, MSG_UNEXPECTED); >> + scmi_log_stats(info->dbg_stats, ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED); > > I'd be tempted to say why dont you wrap these scmi_log_stats() inside the > scmi_bad_message_trace() ... BUT in order to avoid an additional > conditional inside the scmi_bad_message_trace() you will need to somehow > remap the MSG_UNEXPECTED to ERR_MSG_UNEXPECTED inside scmi_bad_message_trace (lets say > with a local onstack array indexed by -err)...AND that would mean committing to keep > such mapping in-sync with the the above enum, so as to avoid that adding > a new definition into scmi_bad_msg BUT not to debug_stat_counters will > end up in a buffer overflow....so at the end probably better/safer to keep it > this way... Yeah, I had the same thoughts and came to the same conclusion. As far as I could determine there weren't enough scmi_bad_message_trace()'s to warrant the extra complexity (both code and processing) of centralising it. Thanks, Luke
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.