STM32 RTC is capable to handle 3 specific pins of the soc.
"out1, out2 and out2_rmp". To handle this, we use pinctrl framework.
There is a single pin per group.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Caron <valentin.caron@foss.st.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index 98b07969609d..c1e69c5b27bd 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -107,6 +110,14 @@
/* STM32 RTC driver time helpers */
#define SEC_PER_DAY (24 * 60 * 60)
+/* STM32 RTC pinctrl helpers */
+#define STM32_RTC_PINMUX(_name, _action, ...) { \
+ .name = (_name), \
+ .action = (_action), \
+ .groups = ((const char *[]){ __VA_ARGS__ }), \
+ .num_groups = ARRAY_SIZE(((const char *[]){ __VA_ARGS__ })), \
+}
+
struct stm32_rtc;
struct stm32_rtc_registers {
@@ -171,6 +182,106 @@ static void stm32_rtc_wpr_lock(struct stm32_rtc *rtc)
writel_relaxed(RTC_WPR_WRONG_KEY, rtc->base + regs->wpr);
}
+enum stm32_rtc_pin_name {
+ NONE,
+ OUT1,
+ OUT2,
+ OUT2_RMP
+};
+
+const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins[] = {
+ PINCTRL_PIN(OUT1, "out1"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(OUT2, "out2"),
+ PINCTRL_PIN(OUT2_RMP, "out2_rmp"),
+};
+
+static int stm32_rtc_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ return ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins);
+}
+
+static const char *stm32_rtc_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector)
+{
+ return stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins[selector].name;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rtc_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+ unsigned int selector,
+ const unsigned int **pins,
+ unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+ *pins = &stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins[selector].number;
+ *num_pins = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stm32_rtc_pinctrl_ops = {
+ .dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_all,
+ .dt_free_map = pinconf_generic_dt_free_map,
+ .get_groups_count = stm32_rtc_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+ .get_group_name = stm32_rtc_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+ .get_group_pins = stm32_rtc_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+};
+
+struct stm32_rtc_pinmux_func {
+ const char *name;
+ const char * const *groups;
+ const unsigned int num_groups;
+ int (*action)(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev, unsigned int pin);
+};
+
+static const struct stm32_rtc_pinmux_func stm32_rtc_pinmux_functions[] = {
+};
+
+static int stm32_rtc_pinmux_get_functions_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+ return ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_rtc_pinmux_functions);
+}
+
+static const char *stm32_rtc_pinmux_get_fname(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int selector)
+{
+ return stm32_rtc_pinmux_functions[selector].name;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rtc_pinmux_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int selector,
+ const char * const **groups, unsigned int * const num_groups)
+{
+ *groups = stm32_rtc_pinmux_functions[selector].groups;
+ *num_groups = stm32_rtc_pinmux_functions[selector].num_groups;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rtc_pinmux_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int selector,
+ unsigned int group)
+{
+ struct stm32_rtc_pinmux_func selected_func = stm32_rtc_pinmux_functions[selector];
+ struct pinctrl_pin_desc pin = stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins[group];
+
+ /* Call action */
+ if (selected_func.action)
+ return selected_func.action(pctldev, pin.number);
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static const struct pinmux_ops stm32_rtc_pinmux_ops = {
+ .get_functions_count = stm32_rtc_pinmux_get_functions_count,
+ .get_function_name = stm32_rtc_pinmux_get_fname,
+ .get_function_groups = stm32_rtc_pinmux_get_groups,
+ .set_mux = stm32_rtc_pinmux_set_mux,
+ .strict = true,
+};
+
+static struct pinctrl_desc stm32_rtc_pdesc = {
+ .name = DRIVER_NAME,
+ .pins = stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins,
+ .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins),
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .pctlops = &stm32_rtc_pinctrl_ops,
+ .pmxops = &stm32_rtc_pinmux_ops,
+};
+
static int stm32_rtc_enter_init_mode(struct stm32_rtc *rtc)
{
const struct stm32_rtc_registers *regs = &rtc->data->regs;
@@ -791,6 +902,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct stm32_rtc *rtc;
const struct stm32_rtc_registers *regs;
+ struct pinctrl_dev *pctl;
int ret;
rtc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*rtc), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -912,6 +1024,14 @@ static int stm32_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
+ ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(&pdev->dev, &stm32_rtc_pdesc, rtc, &pctl);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "pinctrl register failed");
+
+ ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "pinctrl enable failed");
+
/*
* If INITS flag is reset (calendar year field set to 0x00), calendar
* must be initialized
--
2.25.1Hi Valentin, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on abelloni/rtc-next] [also build test ERROR on atorgue-stm32/stm32-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc7 next-20240712] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Valentin-Caron/dt-bindings-rtc-stm32-describe-pinmux-nodes/20240711-233937 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git rtc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711140843.3201530-3-valentin.caron%40foss.st.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: stm32: add pinctrl and pinmux interfaces config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20240713 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407130943.ie6n2Orh-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407130943.ie6n2Orh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407130943.ie6n2Orh-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: devm_pinctrl_register_and_init >>> referenced by rtc-stm32.c >>> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.o:(stm32_rtc_probe) in archive vmlinux.a -- >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: pinctrl_enable >>> referenced by rtc-stm32.c >>> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.o:(stm32_rtc_probe) in archive vmlinux.a -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Hi Valentin,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on abelloni/rtc-next]
[also build test WARNING on atorgue-stm32/stm32-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc7 next-20240712]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Valentin-Caron/dt-bindings-rtc-stm32-describe-pinmux-nodes/20240711-233937
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git rtc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711140843.3201530-3-valentin.caron%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: stm32: add pinctrl and pinmux interfaces
config: hexagon-randconfig-r132-20240712 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407130612.OEicZbNE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project a0c6b8aef853eedaa0980f07c0a502a5a8a9740e)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240713/202407130612.OEicZbNE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407130612.OEicZbNE-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c:192:31: sparse: sparse: symbol 'stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins' was not declared. Should it be static?
vim +/stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins +192 drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
191
> 192 const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stm32_rtc_pinctrl_pins[] = {
193 PINCTRL_PIN(OUT1, "out1"),
194 PINCTRL_PIN(OUT2, "out2"),
195 PINCTRL_PIN(OUT2_RMP, "out2_rmp"),
196 };
197
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.