From: Mohammad Shehar Yaar Tausif <sheharyaar48@gmail.com>

The original function call passed size of smap->bucket before the number of
buckets which raises the error 'calloc-transposed-args' on compilation.

Vlastimil Babka added:

The order of parameters can be traced back all the way to 6ac99e8f23d4
("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage") accross several refactorings,
and that's why the commit is used as a Fixes: tag.

In v6.10-rc1, a different commit 2c321f3f70bc ("mm: change inlined
allocation helpers to account at the call site") however exposed the
order of args in a way that gcc-14 has enough visibility to start
warning about it, because (in !CONFIG_MEMCG case) bpf_map_kvcalloc is
then a macro alias for kvcalloc instead of a static inline wrapper.

To sum up the warning happens when the following conditions are all met:

- gcc-14 is used (didn't see it with gcc-13)
- commit 2c321f3f70bc is present
- CONFIG_MEMCG is not enabled in .config
- CONFIG_WERROR turns this from a compiler warning to error

Fixes: 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
Reviewed-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Shehar Yaar Tausif <sheharyaar48@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 976cb258a0ed..c938dea5ddbf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -782,8 +782,8 @@ bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr,
 	nbuckets = max_t(u32, 2, nbuckets);
 	smap->bucket_log = ilog2(nbuckets);
 
-	smap->buckets = bpf_map_kvcalloc(&smap->map, sizeof(*smap->buckets),
-					 nbuckets, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	smap->buckets = bpf_map_kvcalloc(&smap->map, nbuckets,
+					 sizeof(*smap->buckets), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (!smap->buckets) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto free_smap;
-- 
2.45.2

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Fixes: 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")

Thanks for not forgetting about this! If this matters, just tested this 
against today's mainline:

Tested-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>

C.
-- 
BOFH excuse #418:

Sysadmins busy fighting SPAM.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 3:27 AM Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Fixes: 6ac99e8f23d4 ("bpf: Introduce bpf sk local storage")
>
> Thanks for not forgetting about this! If this matters, just tested this
> against today's mainline:
>
> Tested-by: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>

Thanks everyone. Applied to bpf tree.