[PATCH v2] selftests/breakpoints:Add return value in main function

Zhu Jun posted 1 patch 1 year, 5 months ago
tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH v2] selftests/breakpoints:Add return value in main function
Posted by Zhu Jun 1 year, 5 months ago
Main function return value is int type, so add return
value in the end that this problem was discovered by reading the code

Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - modify commit info  

 tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
index dfec31fb9b30..b473131fce3e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	bool succeeded = true;
 	unsigned int tests = 0;
 	cpu_set_t available_cpus;
-	int err;
+	int err = 0;
 	int cpu;
 
 	ksft_print_header();
@@ -222,4 +222,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		ksft_exit_pass();
 	else
 		ksft_exit_fail();
+
+	return err;
 }
-- 
2.17.1
Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/breakpoints:Add return value in main function
Posted by Shuah Khan 1 year, 5 months ago
On 7/9/24 20:16, Zhu Jun wrote:
> Main function return value is int type, so add return
> value in the end that this problem was discovered by reading the code
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   - modify commit info
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
> index dfec31fb9b30..b473131fce3e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   	bool succeeded = true;
>   	unsigned int tests = 0;
>   	cpu_set_t available_cpus;
> -	int err;
> +	int err = 0;
>   	int cpu;
>   
>   	ksft_print_header();
> @@ -222,4 +222,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>   		ksft_exit_pass();
>   	else
>   		ksft_exit_fail();
> +
> +	return err;
>   }

Unless this is causing a compile error or warning - there is
no need to make this change.

thanks,
-- Shuah