[PATCH net-next 2/2] libceph: fix crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc warnings

Jeff Johnson posted 2 patches 1 year, 5 months ago
[PATCH net-next 2/2] libceph: fix crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc warnings
Posted by Jeff Johnson 1 year, 5 months ago
Currently, when built with "make W=1", the following warnings are
generated:

net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'work' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'weight' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'weight_max' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'choose_args' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'

Update the crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc to document these
parameters.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
---
 net/ceph/crush/mapper.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c b/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c
index 3194d5090963..16a0f7e63d37 100644
--- a/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c
+++ b/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c
@@ -429,7 +429,10 @@ static int is_out(const struct crush_map *map,
 /**
  * crush_choose_firstn - choose numrep distinct items of given type
  * @map: the crush_map
+ * @work: crush workspace initialized by crush_init_workspace()
  * @bucket: the bucket we are choose an item from
+ * @weight: weight vector (for map leaves)
+ * @weight_max: size of weight vector
  * @x: crush input value
  * @numrep: the number of items to choose
  * @type: the type of item to choose
@@ -445,6 +448,7 @@ static int is_out(const struct crush_map *map,
  * @vary_r: pass r to recursive calls
  * @out2: second output vector for leaf items (if @recurse_to_leaf)
  * @parent_r: r value passed from the parent
+ * @choose_args: weights and ids for each known bucket
  */
 static int crush_choose_firstn(const struct crush_map *map,
 			       struct crush_work *work,

-- 
2.42.0
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] libceph: fix crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc warnings
Posted by Simon Horman 1 year, 5 months ago
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:04AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Currently, when built with "make W=1", the following warnings are
> generated:
> 
> net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'work' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'weight' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'weight_max' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'choose_args' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> 
> Update the crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc to document these
> parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] libceph: fix crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc warnings
Posted by Ilya Dryomov 1 year, 5 months ago
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:34 PM Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 11:10:04AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > Currently, when built with "make W=1", the following warnings are
> > generated:
> >
> > net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'work' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> > net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'weight' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> > net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'weight_max' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> > net/ceph/crush/mapper.c:466: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'choose_args' not described in 'crush_choose_firstn'
> >
> > Update the crush_choose_firstn() kernel-doc to document these
> > parameters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>

Applied with a small tweak.

Thanks,

                Ilya