From: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
Keypad specific setup is relaxed if no keypad rows/columns are specified,
enabling a purely gpio operation.
Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
---
drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
index 09bcfc6b9408..7c32f8b69a3e 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct adp5588_kpad {
u32 cols;
u32 unlock_keys[2];
int nkeys_unlock;
+ bool gpio_only;
unsigned short keycode[ADP5588_KEYMAPSIZE];
unsigned char gpiomap[ADP5588_MAXGPIO];
struct gpio_chip gc;
@@ -431,10 +432,12 @@ static int adp5588_gpio_add(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad)
kpad->gc.label = kpad->client->name;
kpad->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
- girq = &kpad->gc.irq;
- gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &adp5588_irq_chip);
- girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
- girq->threaded = true;
+ if (kpad->client->irq) {
+ girq = &kpad->gc.irq;
+ gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &adp5588_irq_chip);
+ girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
+ girq->threaded = true;
+ }
mutex_init(&kpad->gpio_lock);
@@ -632,6 +635,21 @@ static int adp5588_fw_parse(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad)
struct i2c_client *client = kpad->client;
int ret, i;
+ /*
+ * Check if the device is to be operated purely in GPIO mode. To do
+ * so, check that no keypad rows or columns have been specified,
+ * since all GPINS should be configured as GPIO.
+ */
+ ret = device_property_present(&client->dev,
+ "keypad,num-rows");
+ ret |= device_property_present(&client->dev,
+ "keypad,num-columns");
+ /* If purely GPIO, skip keypad setup */
+ if (!ret) {
+ kpad->gpio_only = true;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
ret = matrix_keypad_parse_properties(&client->dev, &kpad->rows,
&kpad->cols);
if (ret)
@@ -775,6 +793,11 @@ static int adp5588_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
if (error)
return error;
+ if (kpad->gpio_only && !client->irq) {
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "Rev.%d, started as GPIO only\n", revid);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
error = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq,
adp5588_hard_irq, adp5588_thread_irq,
IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
@@ -785,6 +808,12 @@ static int adp5588_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
return error;
}
+ if (kpad->gpio_only) {
+ dev_info(&client->dev, "Rev.%d GPIO only, irq %d\n",
+ revid, client->irq);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
dev_info(&client->dev, "Rev.%d keypad, irq %d\n", revid, client->irq);
return 0;
}
--
2.34.1
Hi Utsav,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Utsav Agarwal via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
>
> Keypad specific setup is relaxed if no keypad rows/columns are specified,
> enabling a purely gpio operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> index 09bcfc6b9408..7c32f8b69a3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct adp5588_kpad {
> u32 cols;
> u32 unlock_keys[2];
> int nkeys_unlock;
> + bool gpio_only;
> unsigned short keycode[ADP5588_KEYMAPSIZE];
> unsigned char gpiomap[ADP5588_MAXGPIO];
> struct gpio_chip gc;
> @@ -431,10 +432,12 @@ static int adp5588_gpio_add(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad)
> kpad->gc.label = kpad->client->name;
> kpad->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
> - girq = &kpad->gc.irq;
> - gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &adp5588_irq_chip);
> - girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
> - girq->threaded = true;
> + if (kpad->client->irq) {
> + girq = &kpad->gc.irq;
> + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &adp5588_irq_chip);
> + girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
> + girq->threaded = true;
> + }
>
> mutex_init(&kpad->gpio_lock);
>
> @@ -632,6 +635,21 @@ static int adp5588_fw_parse(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad)
> struct i2c_client *client = kpad->client;
> int ret, i;
>
> + /*
> + * Check if the device is to be operated purely in GPIO mode. To do
> + * so, check that no keypad rows or columns have been specified,
> + * since all GPINS should be configured as GPIO.
> + */
> + ret = device_property_present(&client->dev,
> + "keypad,num-rows");
> + ret |= device_property_present(&client->dev,
> + "keypad,num-columns");
> + /* If purely GPIO, skip keypad setup */
> + if (!ret) {
> + kpad->gpio_only = true;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> ret = matrix_keypad_parse_properties(&client->dev, &kpad->rows,
> &kpad->cols);
> if (ret)
> @@ -775,6 +793,11 @@ static int adp5588_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> + if (kpad->gpio_only && !client->irq) {
> + dev_info(&client->dev, "Rev.%d, started as GPIO only\n", revid);
> + return 0;
I think we need more elaborate handling here (and probably more
elaborate binding yaml file): now that you are making interrupt optional
you should check if interrupt-controller functionality of the GPIO
block/gpiochip is requested. If it was, then we should not allow missing
interrupt. If only GPIO controller is needed, without interrupt
capabilities, tnen running without interrupt is fine.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 17:37 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Utsav,
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Utsav Agarwal via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
> >
> > Keypad specific setup is relaxed if no keypad rows/columns are specified,
> > enabling a purely gpio operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > ---
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> > b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> > index 09bcfc6b9408..7c32f8b69a3e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c
> > @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct adp5588_kpad {
> > u32 cols;
> > u32 unlock_keys[2];
> > int nkeys_unlock;
> > + bool gpio_only;
> > unsigned short keycode[ADP5588_KEYMAPSIZE];
> > unsigned char gpiomap[ADP5588_MAXGPIO];
> > struct gpio_chip gc;
> > @@ -431,10 +432,12 @@ static int adp5588_gpio_add(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad)
> > kpad->gc.label = kpad->client->name;
> > kpad->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> >
> > - girq = &kpad->gc.irq;
> > - gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &adp5588_irq_chip);
> > - girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
> > - girq->threaded = true;
> > + if (kpad->client->irq) {
> > + girq = &kpad->gc.irq;
> > + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &adp5588_irq_chip);
> > + girq->handler = handle_bad_irq;
> > + girq->threaded = true;
> > + }
> >
> > mutex_init(&kpad->gpio_lock);
> >
> > @@ -632,6 +635,21 @@ static int adp5588_fw_parse(struct adp5588_kpad *kpad)
> > struct i2c_client *client = kpad->client;
> > int ret, i;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Check if the device is to be operated purely in GPIO mode. To do
> > + * so, check that no keypad rows or columns have been specified,
> > + * since all GPINS should be configured as GPIO.
> > + */
> > + ret = device_property_present(&client->dev,
> > + "keypad,num-rows");
> > + ret |= device_property_present(&client->dev,
> > + "keypad,num-columns");
> > + /* If purely GPIO, skip keypad setup */
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + kpad->gpio_only = true;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > ret = matrix_keypad_parse_properties(&client->dev, &kpad->rows,
> > &kpad->cols);
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -775,6 +793,11 @@ static int adp5588_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > + if (kpad->gpio_only && !client->irq) {
> > + dev_info(&client->dev, "Rev.%d, started as GPIO only\n",
> > revid);
> > + return 0;
>
> I think we need more elaborate handling here (and probably more
> elaborate binding yaml file): now that you are making interrupt optional
> you should check if interrupt-controller functionality of the GPIO
> block/gpiochip is requested. If it was, then we should not allow missing
> interrupt. If only GPIO controller is needed, without interrupt
> capabilities, tnen running without interrupt is fine.
>
Hi Dmitry,
I need to double check but I don't think we can act as an interrupt-controller
without the interrupt line connected. So, I think the only thing we could likely
add/improve is to express that dependency in the bindings.
- Nuno Sá
On Thu, 2024-07-04 at 15:26 +0100, Utsav Agarwal via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com> > > Keypad specific setup is relaxed if no keypad rows/columns are specified, > enabling a purely gpio operation. > > Signed-off-by: Utsav Agarwal <utsav.agarwal@analog.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.