[PATCH V3 1/3] pinctrl: ti: iodelay: Use scope based of_node_put() cleanups

Peng Fan (OSS) posted 3 patches 1 year, 5 months ago
[PATCH V3 1/3] pinctrl: ti: iodelay: Use scope based of_node_put() cleanups
Posted by Peng Fan (OSS) 1 year, 5 months ago
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Use scope based of_node_put() cleanup to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 43 +++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
index ef9758638501..f5e5a23d2226 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
@@ -822,53 +822,48 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_iodelay_of_match);
 static int ti_iodelay_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	struct device_node *np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
+	struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct ti_iodelay_device *iod;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!np) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
 		dev_err(dev, "No OF node\n");
-		goto exit_out;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	iod = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iod), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!iod) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto exit_out;
-	}
+	if (!iod)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	iod->dev = dev;
 	iod->reg_data = device_get_match_data(dev);
 	if (!iod->reg_data) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
 		dev_err(dev, "No DATA match\n");
-		goto exit_out;
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	/* So far We can assume there is only 1 bank of registers */
 	iod->reg_base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res);
-	if (IS_ERR(iod->reg_base)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(iod->reg_base);
-		goto exit_out;
-	}
+	if (IS_ERR(iod->reg_base))
+		return PTR_ERR(iod->reg_base);
+
 	iod->phys_base = res->start;
 
 	iod->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, iod->reg_base,
 					    iod->reg_data->regmap_config);
 	if (IS_ERR(iod->regmap)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Regmap MMIO init failed.\n");
-		ret = PTR_ERR(iod->regmap);
-		goto exit_out;
+		return PTR_ERR(iod->regmap);
 	}
 
 	ret = ti_iodelay_pinconf_init_dev(iod);
 	if (ret)
-		goto exit_out;
+		return ret;
 
 	ret = ti_iodelay_alloc_pins(dev, iod, res->start);
 	if (ret)
-		goto exit_out;
+		return ret;
 
 	iod->desc.pctlops = &ti_iodelay_pinctrl_ops;
 	/* no pinmux ops - we are pinconf */
@@ -879,20 +874,12 @@ static int ti_iodelay_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(dev, &iod->desc, iod, &iod->pctl);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register pinctrl\n");
-		goto exit_out;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, iod);
 
-	ret = pinctrl_enable(iod->pctl);
-	if (ret)
-		goto exit_out;
-
-	return 0;
-
-exit_out:
-	of_node_put(np);
-	return ret;
+	return pinctrl_enable(iod->pctl);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.37.1
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] pinctrl: ti: iodelay: Use scope based of_node_put() cleanups
Posted by Jonathan Cameron 1 year, 5 months ago
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:17:19 +0800
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com> wrote:

> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Use scope based of_node_put() cleanup to simplify code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
A couple of comments on additional cleanups - primarily
using return dev_err_probe() - enabled by using scope based
cleanup to avoid the goto dance.

Either way LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 43 +++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
> index ef9758638501..f5e5a23d2226 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
> @@ -822,53 +822,48 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_iodelay_of_match);
>  static int ti_iodelay_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	struct device_node *np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
> +	struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	struct ti_iodelay_device *iod;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!np) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		dev_err(dev, "No OF node\n");
> -		goto exit_out;
> +		return -EINVAL;
Whilst you are here can use more compact
		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "No OF node\n");
for all error prints in a probe() function.
They do various nice things on deferred probe but are
useful more generally.

>  	}
>  
>  	iod = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*iod), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!iod) {
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto exit_out;
> -	}
> +	if (!iod)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	iod->dev = dev;
>  	iod->reg_data = device_get_match_data(dev);
>  	if (!iod->reg_data) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		dev_err(dev, "No DATA match\n");
> -		goto exit_out;
> +		return -EINVAL;

return dev_err_probe() works here as well and in 
other cases below. It's an added bonus __free() magic often enables.

No idea why DATA is in capitals and to be honest it's not
a particularly useful error message.  What data? :)

>  	}


>  }
>  
>  /**
Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] pinctrl: ti: iodelay: Use scope based of_node_put() cleanups
Posted by Uwe Kleine-König 1 year, 5 months ago
Hello Peng,

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 09:17:19PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Use scope based of_node_put() cleanup to simplify code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 43 +++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
> index ef9758638501..f5e5a23d2226 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
> @@ -822,53 +822,48 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_iodelay_of_match);
>  static int ti_iodelay_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	struct device_node *np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
> +	struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_node_get(dev->of_node);

of_node_put? -------------------------------------------^

Best regards
Uwe