[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency

Dhananjay Ugwekar posted 2 patches 1 year, 5 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency
Posted by Dhananjay Ugwekar 1 year, 5 months ago
cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.

Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
@@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 	int cpu = 0;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
 	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
+	u32 nominal_freq_khz;
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
@@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 			break;
 		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
 
-		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
-			(cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
+		nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
+		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
+			(nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
 			(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
 			(cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
 			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 			pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
-				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
+				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
 				cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
 			goto skip_test;
 		}
@@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
 
 		if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
 			if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
-					(policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
+					(policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
 				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
 			else {
 				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
 				pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
 					__func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
-					cpudata->nominal_freq);
+					nominal_freq_khz);
 				goto skip_test;
 			}
 		} else {
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency
Posted by Mario Limonciello 1 year, 5 months ago
On 6/25/2024 08:41, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
> KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.
> 
> Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>

The code change below looks fine to me, but I think the tag is wrong. 
It should go with the "fix" that caused the inconsistency.  Here is what
I think the correct tag should be:

Fixes: e4731baaf294 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix the inconsistency in max 
frequency units")

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>   	int cpu = 0;
>   	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
>   	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
> +	u32 nominal_freq_khz;
>   
>   	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>   		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> @@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>   			break;
>   		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>   
> -		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
> -			(cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
> +		nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
> +		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
> +			(nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>   			(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
>   			(cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
>   			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>   			pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
> -				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
> +				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
>   				cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
>   			goto skip_test;
>   		}
> @@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>   
>   		if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
>   			if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
> -					(policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
> +					(policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
>   				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>   			else {
>   				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>   				pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
>   					__func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
> -					cpudata->nominal_freq);
> +					nominal_freq_khz);
>   				goto skip_test;
>   			}
>   		} else {
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency
Posted by Dhananjay Ugwekar 1 year, 5 months ago
Hello Mario,

On 6/25/2024 8:35 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 6/25/2024 08:41, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
>> KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.
>>
>> Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
> 
> The code change below looks fine to me, but I think the tag is wrong. It should go with the "fix" that caused the inconsistency.  Here is what
> I think the correct tag should be:
> 
> Fixes: e4731baaf294 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Fix the inconsistency in max frequency units")

Makes sense, will update the tag.

Thanks for reviewing!

Regards,
Dhananjay

> 
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>       int cpu = 0;
>>       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
>>       struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
>> +    u32 nominal_freq_khz;
>>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>           policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>> @@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>               break;
>>           cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>>   -        if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
>> -            (cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>> +        nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
>> +        if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
>> +            (nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>>               (cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
>>               (cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
>>               amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>>               pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
>> -                __func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
>> +                __func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
>>                   cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
>>               goto skip_test;
>>           }
>> @@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>             if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
>>               if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
>> -                    (policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
>> +                    (policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
>>                   amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>>               else {
>>                   amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>>                   pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
>>                       __func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
>> -                    cpudata->nominal_freq);
>> +                    nominal_freq_khz);
>>                   goto skip_test;
>>               }
>>           } else {
> 
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency
Posted by Dhananjay Ugwekar 1 year, 5 months ago
Minor modification, the commit subject is supposed to be 
"cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency between nominal_freq and other *_freq units"

The second half disappeared due to the word wrapping I guess.

Regards,
Dhananjay

On 6/25/2024 7:11 PM, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
> KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.
> 
> Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>  	int cpu = 0;
>  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
>  	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
> +	u32 nominal_freq_khz;
>  
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> @@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>  			break;
>  		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>  
> -		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
> -			(cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
> +		nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
> +		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
> +			(nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>  			(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
>  			(cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
>  			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>  			pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
> -				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
> +				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
>  				cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
>  			goto skip_test;
>  		}
> @@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>  
>  		if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
>  			if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
> -					(policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
> +					(policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
>  				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>  			else {
>  				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>  				pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
>  					__func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
> -					cpudata->nominal_freq);
> +					nominal_freq_khz);
>  				goto skip_test;
>  			}
>  		} else {
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency
Posted by Mario Limonciello 1 year, 5 months ago
On 6/25/2024 08:51, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> Minor modification, the commit subject is supposed to be
> "cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency between nominal_freq and other *_freq units"
> 
> The second half disappeared due to the word wrapping I guess.

I had some other feedback on the series, so when you submit a v2 can you 
try to fix the title on the first patch?

> 
> Regards,
> Dhananjay
> 
> On 6/25/2024 7:11 PM, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
>> KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.
>>
>> Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>   	int cpu = 0;
>>   	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
>>   	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
>> +	u32 nominal_freq_khz;
>>   
>>   	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>   		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>> @@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>   			break;
>>   		cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>>   
>> -		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
>> -			(cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>> +		nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
>> +		if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
>> +			(nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>>   			(cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
>>   			(cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
>>   			amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>>   			pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
>> -				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
>> +				__func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
>>   				cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
>>   			goto skip_test;
>>   		}
>> @@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>   
>>   		if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
>>   			if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
>> -					(policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
>> +					(policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
>>   				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>>   			else {
>>   				amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>>   				pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
>>   					__func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
>> -					cpudata->nominal_freq);
>> +					nominal_freq_khz);
>>   				goto skip_test;
>>   			}
>>   		} else {
Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency
Posted by Dhananjay Ugwekar 1 year, 5 months ago
Hello Mario,

On 6/25/2024 8:41 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 6/25/2024 08:51, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>> Minor modification, the commit subject is supposed to be
>> "cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Handle the inconsistency between nominal_freq and other *_freq units"
>>
>> The second half disappeared due to the word wrapping I guess.
> 
> I had some other feedback on the series, so when you submit a v2 can you try to fix the title on the first patch?

Yup, will do!

Thanks,
Dhananjay

> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dhananjay
>>
>> On 6/25/2024 7:11 PM, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
>>> cpudata->nominal_freq being in MHz whereas other frequencies being in
>>> KHz breaks the amd-pstate-ut frequency sanity check. This fixes it.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 14eb1c96e3a3 ("cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add test module for amd-pstate driver")
>>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>>> index fc275d41d51e..66b73c308ce6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
>>> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>>       int cpu = 0;
>>>       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = NULL;
>>>       struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = NULL;
>>> +    u32 nominal_freq_khz;
>>>         for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>>           policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>>> @@ -209,13 +210,14 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>>               break;
>>>           cpudata = policy->driver_data;
>>>   -        if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= cpudata->nominal_freq) &&
>>> -            (cpudata->nominal_freq > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>>> +        nominal_freq_khz = cpudata->nominal_freq*1000;
>>> +        if (!((cpudata->max_freq >= nominal_freq_khz) &&
>>> +            (nominal_freq_khz > cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq) &&
>>>               (cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq > cpudata->min_freq) &&
>>>               (cpudata->min_freq > 0))) {
>>>               amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>>>               pr_err("%s cpu%d max=%d >= nominal=%d > lowest_nonlinear=%d > min=%d > 0, the formula is incorrect!\n",
>>> -                __func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, cpudata->nominal_freq,
>>> +                __func__, cpu, cpudata->max_freq, nominal_freq_khz,
>>>                   cpudata->lowest_nonlinear_freq, cpudata->min_freq);
>>>               goto skip_test;
>>>           }
>>> @@ -229,13 +231,13 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_freq(u32 index)
>>>             if (cpudata->boost_supported) {
>>>               if ((policy->max == cpudata->max_freq) ||
>>> -                    (policy->max == cpudata->nominal_freq))
>>> +                    (policy->max == nominal_freq_khz))
>>>                   amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_PASS;
>>>               else {
>>>                   amd_pstate_ut_cases[index].result = AMD_PSTATE_UT_RESULT_FAIL;
>>>                   pr_err("%s cpu%d policy_max=%d should be equal cpu_max=%d or cpu_nominal=%d !\n",
>>>                       __func__, cpu, policy->max, cpudata->max_freq,
>>> -                    cpudata->nominal_freq);
>>> +                    nominal_freq_khz);
>>>                   goto skip_test;
>>>               }
>>>           } else {
>