arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Check for invalid hva address stored in data before calling
kvm_gpc_activate_hva() instead of only compare with 0.
Reported-by: syzbot+fd555292a1da3180fc82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd555292a1da3180fc82
Tested-by: syzbot+fd555292a1da3180fc82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pei Li <peili.dev@gmail.com>
---
Syzbot reports a warning message in __kvm_gpc_refresh(). This warning
requires at least one of gpa and uhva to be valid.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5090 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/pfncache.c:259 __kvm_gpc_refresh+0xf17/0x1090 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/pfncache.c:259
We are calling it from kvm_gpc_activate_hva(). This function always calls
__kvm_gpc_activate() with INVALID_GPA. Thus, uhva must be valid to
disable this warning.
This patch checks for invalid hva address as well instead of only
comparing hva with 0 before calling kvm_gpc_activate_hva()
syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger
any issue.
Tested on:
commit: 55027e68 Merge tag 'input-for-v6.10-rc5' of git://git...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16ea803a980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e40800950091403a
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd555292a1da3180fc82
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=16eeb53e980000
Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.
---
arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
index f65b35a05d91..de5f34492405 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data)
r = kvm_gpc_activate(&vcpu->arch.xen.vcpu_info_cache,
data->u.gpa, sizeof(struct vcpu_info));
} else {
- if (data->u.hva == 0) {
+ if (data->u.hva == 0 || kvm_is_error_hva(data->u.hva)) {
kvm_gpc_deactivate(&vcpu->arch.xen.vcpu_info_cache);
r = 0;
break;
---
base-commit: 2bfcfd584ff5ccc8bb7acde19b42570414bf880b
change-id: 20240625-bug5-5d332b5e5161
Best regards,
--
Pei Li <peili.dev@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, Pei Li wrote:
> Check for invalid hva address stored in data before calling
> kvm_gpc_activate_hva() instead of only compare with 0.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+fd555292a1da3180fc82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd555292a1da3180fc82
> Tested-by: syzbot+fd555292a1da3180fc82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Pei Li <peili.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
> Syzbot reports a warning message in __kvm_gpc_refresh(). This warning
> requires at least one of gpa and uhva to be valid.
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5090 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/pfncache.c:259 __kvm_gpc_refresh+0xf17/0x1090 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/pfncache.c:259
>
> We are calling it from kvm_gpc_activate_hva(). This function always calls
> __kvm_gpc_activate() with INVALID_GPA. Thus, uhva must be valid to
> disable this warning.
>
> This patch checks for invalid hva address as well instead of only
> comparing hva with 0 before calling kvm_gpc_activate_hva()
>
> syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger
> any issue.
>
> Tested on:
>
> commit: 55027e68 Merge tag 'input-for-v6.10-rc5' of git://git...
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16ea803a980000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e40800950091403a
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd555292a1da3180fc82
> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=16eeb53e980000
>
> Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> index f65b35a05d91..de5f34492405 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data)
> r = kvm_gpc_activate(&vcpu->arch.xen.vcpu_info_cache,
> data->u.gpa, sizeof(struct vcpu_info));
> } else {
> - if (data->u.hva == 0) {
> + if (data->u.hva == 0 || kvm_is_error_hva(data->u.hva)) {
> kvm_gpc_deactivate(&vcpu->arch.xen.vcpu_info_cache);
> r = 0;
> break;
Hmm, I think what we want is to return -EINVAL in this case, not deactivate the
region. I could have sworn KVM does that. Gah, I caught
KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_SHARED_INFO_HVA during review, but missed this one. So to fix
this immediate bug, and avoid similar issues in the future, this?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
index 93814d3850eb..622fe24da910 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data)
} else {
void __user * hva = u64_to_user_ptr(data->u.shared_info.hva);
- if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(hva) || !access_ok(hva, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(hva)) {
r = -EINVAL;
} else if (!hva) {
kvm_gpc_deactivate(&kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
index 0ab90f45db37..728d2c1b488a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
@@ -438,6 +438,9 @@ int kvm_gpc_activate(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned long len)
int kvm_gpc_activate_hva(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, unsigned long uhva, unsigned long len)
{
+ if (!access_ok((void __user *)uhva, len))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return __kvm_gpc_activate(gpc, INVALID_GPA, uhva, len);
}
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 01:08:47PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, Pei Li wrote:
> > Check for invalid hva address stored in data before calling
> > kvm_gpc_activate_hva() instead of only compare with 0.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+fd555292a1da3180fc82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd555292a1da3180fc82
> > Tested-by: syzbot+fd555292a1da3180fc82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Pei Li <peili.dev@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Syzbot reports a warning message in __kvm_gpc_refresh(). This warning
> > requires at least one of gpa and uhva to be valid.
> > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5090 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/pfncache.c:259 __kvm_gpc_refresh+0xf17/0x1090 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/pfncache.c:259
> >
> > We are calling it from kvm_gpc_activate_hva(). This function always calls
> > __kvm_gpc_activate() with INVALID_GPA. Thus, uhva must be valid to
> > disable this warning.
> >
> > This patch checks for invalid hva address as well instead of only
> > comparing hva with 0 before calling kvm_gpc_activate_hva()
> >
> > syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger
> > any issue.
> >
> > Tested on:
> >
> > commit: 55027e68 Merge tag 'input-for-v6.10-rc5' of git://git...
> > git tree: upstream
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=16ea803a980000
> > kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e40800950091403a
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=fd555292a1da3180fc82
> > compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
> > patch: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=16eeb53e980000
> >
> > Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/xen.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> > index f65b35a05d91..de5f34492405 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ int kvm_xen_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_xen_vcpu_attr *data)
> > r = kvm_gpc_activate(&vcpu->arch.xen.vcpu_info_cache,
> > data->u.gpa, sizeof(struct vcpu_info));
> > } else {
> > - if (data->u.hva == 0) {
> > + if (data->u.hva == 0 || kvm_is_error_hva(data->u.hva)) {
> > kvm_gpc_deactivate(&vcpu->arch.xen.vcpu_info_cache);
> > r = 0;
> > break;
>
> Hmm, I think what we want is to return -EINVAL in this case, not deactivate the
> region. I could have sworn KVM does that. Gah, I caught
> KVM_XEN_ATTR_TYPE_SHARED_INFO_HVA during review, but missed this one. So to fix
> this immediate bug, and avoid similar issues in the future, this?
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> index 93814d3850eb..622fe24da910 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/xen.c
> @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ int kvm_xen_hvm_set_attr(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_xen_hvm_attr *data)
> } else {
> void __user * hva = u64_to_user_ptr(data->u.shared_info.hva);
>
> - if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(hva) || !access_ok(hva, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(hva)) {
> r = -EINVAL;
> } else if (!hva) {
> kvm_gpc_deactivate(&kvm->arch.xen.shinfo_cache);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
> index 0ab90f45db37..728d2c1b488a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/pfncache.c
> @@ -438,6 +438,9 @@ int kvm_gpc_activate(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, gpa_t gpa, unsigned long len)
>
> int kvm_gpc_activate_hva(struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc, unsigned long uhva, unsigned long len)
> {
> + if (!access_ok((void __user *)uhva, len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> return __kvm_gpc_activate(gpc, INVALID_GPA, uhva, len);
> }
>
Thanks Sean. I’ll test and work on v2 based on your suggestions.
Best regards,
Pei
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.