SM7125 is the SoC found in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro(joyeuse) cellphone.
This series adds support to bring up the CSIPHY, CSID, VFE/RDI interfaces.

Since SM7125 is a low-speed variant of SC7180, SC7180 testers please
take a look and have a test as well.

sc7180 provides

- 2 x VFE
- 1 x VFE Lite
- 2 x CSID
- 1 x CSID Lite
- 4 x CSI PHY

The sc7180-camss binding should be comaptible with sdm845 yaml.
I've copied a new yaml from sdm845-camss.yaml, strip all _src clk and
put new maintainer information. If this is not desirable then i can add binding to
existing sdm845 yaml instead.

In addition, a bootable tree of sm7125/joyeuse is availble at:
https://github.com/99degree/linux/tree/camss  

Signed-off-by: George Chan <gchan9527@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Rebased on 20240522154659.510-1-quic_grosikop@quicinc.com - Bryan
- Align email title to sc8280xp series - krzk
- Line-up dt-binding example ordering to same as qcom,sm8250-camss.yaml - krzk 
- Drop non-related patches #5 #6 #7, I will send follow-up patches later
- Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
- Drop required-opps node from dt
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624-b4-sc7180-camss-v2-0-0dfecdc50073@gmail.com

Changes in v2:
- Revised dt-binding title - krzk
- Revised dt-binding maintainers - krzk
- Drop all dt-binding minItems - krzk
- Drops "|" symbol postfixed to description - krzk 
- Accending order of dt-binding required list - krzk
- Added dt-binding item power-domain-name - Bryan
- Reformat dt-binding example - krzk
- Move reg as 2nd property - krzk
- Move reg-names as 3nd property - krzk
- Reduce iommus maxItems to 3 - rob's bot
- Reduce clocks maxItems to 24 - rob's bot
- Combine patch #2 and #3 - krzk and Bryan
- Split eror-print log for clk name from #5 - Konrad
- Reformat dt-node - krzk
- Corrected phy init sequence for v1.2.2 - Bryan
- Added 3 more debug info for missing clk and low clk-rate issue.
- Adding port info to ports sub-node
- Adding required-opps node to dt
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240621-b4-sc7180-camss-v1-0-14937929f30e@gmail.com

---
George Chan (5):
      dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sc7180-camss
      media: camss: csiphy-3ph: Add Gen2 v1.2.2 two-phase MIPI CSI-2 DPHY init
      media: qcom: camss: Add sc7180 support
      media: qcom: camss: Add sc7180 resources
      arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: camss: Add CAMSS block definition

 .../bindings/media/qcom,sc7180-camss.yaml          | 328 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi               | 133 +++++++++
 .../platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy-3ph-1-0.c     | 135 +++++++++
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c      |   2 +
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c          | 251 ++++++++++++++++
 drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h          |   1 +
 6 files changed, 850 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 28f69d2ea67db489d4a94e7d04c21b14e5aa6535
change-id: 20240621-b4-sc7180-camss-cddc6b60a9b4

Best regards,
-- 
George Chan <gchan9527@gmail.com>

On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.

Have you not tested this updated series ?

---
bod

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
> > - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
>
> Have you not tested this updated series ?
>
> ---
> bod

Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my
tested-by that way.

Tested:
Linus tree 5f583a3162ffd9f7999af76b8ab634ce2dac9f90 +
20240522154659.510-1-quic_grosikop@quicinc.com with mine patches

Not test:
linux-next + 20240522154659.510-1-quic_grosikop@quicinc.com + mine

Just for reference, last month i pushed grosikop's patch with mine to below:
https://github.com/99degree/linux/tree/camss-working

On 24.06.2024 5:03 PM, george chan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue
> <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
>>
>> Have you not tested this updated series ?
>>
>> ---
>> bod
> 
> Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my
> tested-by that way.

"RFT" means "I didn't actually test this" or "please provide more testing",
not "there have not been tested-by's from others"

Konrad

On 25/06/2024 17:57, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 24.06.2024 5:03 PM, george chan wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue
>> <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
>>>
>>> Have you not tested this updated series ?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> bod
>>
>> Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my
>> tested-by that way.
> 
> "RFT" means "I didn't actually test this" or "please provide more testing",
> not "there have not been tested-by's from others"
> 
> Konrad

Exactly, RFT says to me "someone else needs to add testing here".

In your next drop with the changes and RBs please drop RFT - unless you 
want someone else to test it for you.

I don't think that's required right now since the set seems 
straight-forward enough and TBH the bit of 7180 hardware I have sits in 
a box unopened and will likely stay that way for the next few months at 
least.

I think your example video is proof enough the thing works ;)

---
bod

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:44 AM Bryan O'Donoghue
<bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2024 17:57, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 24.06.2024 5:03 PM, george chan wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue
> >> <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
> >>>> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
> >>>
> >>> Have you not tested this updated series ?
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> bod
> >>
> >> Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my
> >> tested-by that way.
> >
> > "RFT" means "I didn't actually test this" or "please provide more testing",
> > not "there have not been tested-by's from others"
> >
> > Konrad
>
> Exactly, RFT says to me "someone else needs to add testing here".
>

gotcha.

> In your next drop with the changes and RBs please drop RFT - unless you
> want someone else to test it for you.
>

If the test result on sm7125 is convincing then I have no problem.

> I don't think that's required right now since the set seems
> straight-forward enough and TBH the bit of 7180 hardware I have sits in
> a box unopened and will likely stay that way for the next few months at
> least.
>
> I think your example video is proof enough the thing works ;)
Nice to hear.
>
> ---
> bod