From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Split the current .dts into two: the existing one keeps the name and
supports revision 2 of the board while patch 2 adds a .dts for revision 3.

Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
  arm64: dts: qcom: move common parts for sa8775p-ride variants into a
    .dtsi
  arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p-ride-r3: add new board file

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile            |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p-ride-r3.dts |  42 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p-ride.dts    | 841 +------------------
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p-ride.dtsi   | 817 ++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 882 insertions(+), 819 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p-ride-r3.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8775p-ride.dtsi

-- 
2.43.0

On 6/19/24 20:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> Split the current .dts into two: the existing one keeps the name and
> supports revision 2 of the board while patch 2 adds a .dts for revision 3.

Are both gonna be actively used?

Konrad

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:50 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/19/24 20:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Split the current .dts into two: the existing one keeps the name and
> > supports revision 2 of the board while patch 2 adds a .dts for revision 3.
>
> Are both gonna be actively used?
>

Yes! This is the reason for the split. I initially wanted to just
change the PHY in the original .dts but then I learned there are a lot
of r2 boards in the wild at QCom so we need to support both.

Bart

On 20.06.2024 9:07 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:50 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/19/24 20:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Split the current .dts into two: the existing one keeps the name and
>>> supports revision 2 of the board while patch 2 adds a .dts for revision 3.
>>
>> Are both gonna be actively used?
>>
> 
> Yes! This is the reason for the split. I initially wanted to just
> change the PHY in the original .dts but then I learned there are a lot
> of r2 boards in the wild at QCom so we need to support both.

Ok, thanks for confirming

Konrad

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 09:07:05AM GMT, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 8:50 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/24 20:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Split the current .dts into two: the existing one keeps the name and
> > > supports revision 2 of the board while patch 2 adds a .dts for revision 3.
> >
> > Are both gonna be actively used?
> >
> 
> Yes! This is the reason for the split. I initially wanted to just
> change the PHY in the original .dts but then I learned there are a lot
> of r2 boards in the wild at QCom so we need to support both.

For what its worth, I've got access to _only_ the r2 boards in a lab
right now and use them quite actively... so please don't pull that dtb
:)

Glad to see some movement on supporting the newer version I've heard
about but haven't seen!