include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++++ kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com>
The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through
CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several
iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support.
This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes
malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified
with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new
config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit
DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com>
Co-developed-by: Davide Salaris <davide.salaris@abinsula.com>
---
include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++++
kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index f693aafe221f..629220a777e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -74,7 +74,11 @@
*/
#define DMA_MAPPING_ERROR (~(dma_addr_t)0)
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY
+#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) > 32) ? ((1ULL<<(32))-1) : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
+#else
#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
void debug_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr);
diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
index c06e56be0ca1..0a27eafed808 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
@@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
def_bool 64BIT || PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
+config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY
+ bool "64bit System has DMA32 only"
+ depends on ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
+ default n
+ help
+ This enables forcing the maximum DMA_BIT_MASK to 32 bits for
+ 64-bit systems that have DMA support limited to 32 bits.
+
config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK
bool
--
2.34.1
On 2024-06-19 10:17 am, Alberto Secondi wrote: > ------ Tessian Warning ------ > > Be careful, the email's sending address "albertosecondi@gmail[.]com" has never been seen on your company's network before today > > This warning message will be removed if you reply to or forward this email to a recipient outside of your organization. > > ---- Tessian Warning End ---- > > From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com> > > The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through > CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several > iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support. > This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes > malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified > with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new > config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit > DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly. No. If a system has devices naturally capable of >32-bit DMA, and memory at >32-bit system physical addresses, but only a 32-bit interconnect in between, that needs to be described properly in Devicetree/ACPI, not hacked around with completely non-portable kernel bodges. Thanks, Robin. > Signed-off-by: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com> > Co-developed-by: Davide Salaris <davide.salaris@abinsula.com> > --- > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++++ > kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > index f693aafe221f..629220a777e3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > @@ -74,7 +74,11 @@ > */ > #define DMA_MAPPING_ERROR (~(dma_addr_t)0) > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY > +#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) > 32) ? ((1ULL<<(32))-1) : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > +#else > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > +#endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG > void debug_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr); > diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig > index c06e56be0ca1..0a27eafed808 100644 > --- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig > +++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig > @@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE > config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > def_bool 64BIT || PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > > +config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY > + bool "64bit System has DMA32 only" > + depends on ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > + default n > + help > + This enables forcing the maximum DMA_BIT_MASK to 32 bits for > + 64-bit systems that have DMA support limited to 32 bits. > + > config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK > bool >
Hi Robin
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:36 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 2024-06-19 10:17 am, Alberto Secondi wrote:
> > ------ Tessian Warning ------
> >
> > Be careful, the email's sending address "albertosecondi@gmail[.]com" has never been seen on your company's network before today
> >
> > This warning message will be removed if you reply to or forward this email to a recipient outside of your organization.
> >
> > ---- Tessian Warning End ----
> >
> > From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com>
> >
> > The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through
> > CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several
> > iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support.
> > This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes
> > malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified
> > with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new
> > config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit
> > DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly.
>
> No. If a system has devices naturally capable of >32-bit DMA, and memory
> at >32-bit system physical addresses, but only a 32-bit interconnect in
> between, that needs to be described properly in Devicetree/ACPI, not
> hacked around with completely non-portable kernel bodges.
>
commit 4251a3ac4de9625a284a9c046cc915487e9b2a5e
Author: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue May 4 10:20:51 2021 +0200
arm64: dts: imx8mm: specify dma-ranges
DMA addressing capabilities on i.MX8MM are limited by the interconnect,
same as on i.MX8MQ. Add dma-ranges to the the peripheral bus to let
the kernel know about this.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
index 64aa38fd2b6e0..e7648c3b83905 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
@@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ soc@0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x3e000000>;
+ dma-ranges = <0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000 0xc0000000>;
nvmem-cells = <&imx8mm_uid>;
nvmem-cell-names = "soc_unique_id";
Somenthing like this should already do it?
Michael
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Davide Salaris <davide.salaris@abinsula.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++++
> > kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > index f693aafe221f..629220a777e3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
> > @@ -74,7 +74,11 @@
> > */
> > #define DMA_MAPPING_ERROR (~(dma_addr_t)0)
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY
> > +#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) > 32) ? ((1ULL<<(32))-1) : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
> > +#else
> > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
> > +#endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
> > void debug_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr);
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
> > index c06e56be0ca1..0a27eafed808 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig
> > @@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE
> > config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > def_bool 64BIT || PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> >
> > +config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY
> > + bool "64bit System has DMA32 only"
> > + depends on ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + This enables forcing the maximum DMA_BIT_MASK to 32 bits for
> > + 64-bit systems that have DMA support limited to 32 bits.
> > +
> > config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK
> > bool
> >
>
On 2024-06-19 12:43 pm, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> Hi Robin
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:36 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2024-06-19 10:17 am, Alberto Secondi wrote:
>>> ------ Tessian Warning ------
>>>
>>> Be careful, the email's sending address "albertosecondi@gmail[.]com" has never been seen on your company's network before today
>>>
>>> This warning message will be removed if you reply to or forward this email to a recipient outside of your organization.
>>>
>>> ---- Tessian Warning End ----
>>>
>>> From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com>
>>>
>>> The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through
>>> CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several
>>> iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support.
>>> This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes
>>> malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified
>>> with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new
>>> config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit
>>> DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly.
>>
>> No. If a system has devices naturally capable of >32-bit DMA, and memory
>> at >32-bit system physical addresses, but only a 32-bit interconnect in
>> between, that needs to be described properly in Devicetree/ACPI, not
>> hacked around with completely non-portable kernel bodges.
>>
>
> commit 4251a3ac4de9625a284a9c046cc915487e9b2a5e
> Author: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Date: Tue May 4 10:20:51 2021 +0200
>
> arm64: dts: imx8mm: specify dma-ranges
>
> DMA addressing capabilities on i.MX8MM are limited by the interconnect,
> same as on i.MX8MQ. Add dma-ranges to the the peripheral bus to let
> the kernel know about this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> index 64aa38fd2b6e0..e7648c3b83905 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ soc@0 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x3e000000>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000 0xc0000000>;
> nvmem-cells = <&imx8mm_uid>;
> nvmem-cell-names = "soc_unique_id";
>
>
> Somenthing like this should already do it?
Hmm, indeed... so the question to dig into would be why that's
apparently not getting picked up by of_dma_get_range() for that device.
Thanks,
Robin.
Hi Robin
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 2:46 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-06-19 12:43 pm, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
> > Hi Robin
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 12:36 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2024-06-19 10:17 am, Alberto Secondi wrote:
> >>> ------ Tessian Warning ------
> >>>
> >>> Be careful, the email's sending address "albertosecondi@gmail[.]com" has never been seen on your company's network before today
> >>>
> >>> This warning message will be removed if you reply to or forward this email to a recipient outside of your organization.
> >>>
> >>> ---- Tessian Warning End ----
> >>>
> >>> From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com>
> >>>
> >>> The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through
> >>> CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several
> >>> iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support.
> >>> This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes
> >>> malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified
> >>> with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new
> >>> config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit
> >>> DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly.
> >>
> >> No. If a system has devices naturally capable of >32-bit DMA, and memory
> >> at >32-bit system physical addresses, but only a 32-bit interconnect in
> >> between, that needs to be described properly in Devicetree/ACPI, not
> >> hacked around with completely non-portable kernel bodges.
> >>
> >
> > commit 4251a3ac4de9625a284a9c046cc915487e9b2a5e
> > Author: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > Date: Tue May 4 10:20:51 2021 +0200
> >
> > arm64: dts: imx8mm: specify dma-ranges
> >
> > DMA addressing capabilities on i.MX8MM are limited by the interconnect,
> > same as on i.MX8MQ. Add dma-ranges to the the peripheral bus to let
> > the kernel know about this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> > Tested-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > index 64aa38fd2b6e0..e7648c3b83905 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ soc@0 {
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <1>;
> > ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x3e000000>;
> > + dma-ranges = <0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000 0xc0000000>;
> > nvmem-cells = <&imx8mm_uid>;
> > nvmem-cell-names = "soc_unique_id";
> >
> >
> > Somenthing like this should already do it?
>
> Hmm, indeed... so the question to dig into would be why that's
> apparently not getting picked up by of_dma_get_range() for that device.
>
The patch does not include what kernel version was tested. After we
have this answer that
we can know
Michael
> Thanks,
> Robin.
--
Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer
M. +39 347 913 2170
michael@amarulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions BV
Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL
T. +31 (0)85 111 9172
info@amarulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
Hi Alberto On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:20 AM Alberto Secondi <albertosecondi@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com> > > The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through > CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several > iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support. > This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes > malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified > with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new > config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit > DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com> > Co-developed-by: Davide Salaris <davide.salaris@abinsula.com> > --- > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++++ > kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > index f693aafe221f..629220a777e3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > @@ -74,7 +74,11 @@ > */ > #define DMA_MAPPING_ERROR (~(dma_addr_t)0) > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY > +#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) > 32) ? ((1ULL<<(32))-1) : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > +#else > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > +#endif > How can this fit configuration where you want to have one Kernel image for several arm64 machine? Michael > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG > void debug_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr); > diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig > index c06e56be0ca1..0a27eafed808 100644 > --- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig > +++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig > @@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE > config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > def_bool 64BIT || PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > > +config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY > + bool "64bit System has DMA32 only" > + depends on ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > + default n > + help > + This enables forcing the maximum DMA_BIT_MASK to 32 bits for > + 64-bit systems that have DMA support limited to 32 bits. > + > config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK > bool > > -- > 2.34.1 > >
Hi Alberto On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:23 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > Hi Alberto > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:20 AM Alberto Secondi > <albertosecondi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com> > > > > The kernel assumes that 64-bit systems have 64-bit DMA support through > > CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT. This is not always true; for example, several > > iMX8 systems (verified on iMX8MM and iMX8MP) have DMA with only 32-bit support. > > This results in several drivers requesting DMA_BIT_MASK(64), which causes > > malfunctions, particularly when systems have more than 3GB of DRAM (verified > > with the lan743x driver and iMX8 systems with 4GB of DRAM). Therefore, a new > > config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY was added to manage 64-bit systems with 32-bit > > DMA, which adjusts DMA_BIT_MASK(n) accordingly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alberto Secondi <alberto.secondi@abinsula.com> > > Co-developed-by: Davide Salaris <davide.salaris@abinsula.com> > > --- > > include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 4 ++++ > > kernel/dma/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > > index f693aafe221f..629220a777e3 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > > +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h > > @@ -74,7 +74,11 @@ > > */ > > #define DMA_MAPPING_ERROR (~(dma_addr_t)0) > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY > > +#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) > 32) ? ((1ULL<<(32))-1) : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > > +#else > > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) > > +#endif > > > > How can this fit configuration where you want to have one Kernel image > for several arm64 machine? > I'm not an expert here but: @coherent_dma_mask: Like dma_mask, but for alloc_coherent mapping as not all * hardware supports 64-bit addresses for consistent allocations * such descriptors. This looks more connected to what you are looking for. Michael > Michael > > > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG > > void debug_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr); > > diff --git a/kernel/dma/Kconfig b/kernel/dma/Kconfig > > index c06e56be0ca1..0a27eafed808 100644 > > --- a/kernel/dma/Kconfig > > +++ b/kernel/dma/Kconfig > > @@ -36,6 +36,14 @@ config NEED_DMA_MAP_STATE > > config ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > > def_bool 64BIT || PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT > > > > +config ARCH_64BIT_HAS_DMA32_ONLY > > + bool "64bit System has DMA32 only" > > + depends on ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT > > + default n > > + help > > + This enables forcing the maximum DMA_BIT_MASK to 32 bits for > > + 64-bit systems that have DMA support limited to 32 bits. > > + > > config ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_MASK > > bool > > > > -- > > 2.34.1 > > > >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.