drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
In order to finally confine the unsafe gpiochip_get_desc() to
drivers/gpio/, let's convert this driver to using the safer alternative
that takes the gpio_device as argument.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c
index 22e3cd2cc963..6f44a13b90ce 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-da9062.c
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int da9062_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc,
{
struct da9062_pctl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
struct regmap *regmap = pctl->da9062->regmap;
- struct gpio_desc *desc = gpiochip_get_desc(gc, offset);
+ struct gpio_desc *desc = gpio_device_get_desc(gc->gpiodev, offset);
unsigned int gpi_type;
int ret;
--
2.43.0
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:18:24 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> In order to finally confine the unsafe gpiochip_get_desc() to
> drivers/gpio/, let's convert this driver to using the safer alternative
> that takes the gpio_device as argument.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] pinctrl: da9062: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc()
commit: 8657af6c0a9afaa11947b7476119834898823b52
Best regards,
--
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 1:18 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > In order to finally confine the unsafe gpiochip_get_desc() to > drivers/gpio/, let's convert this driver to using the safer alternative > that takes the gpio_device as argument. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> I guess you will apply this to the GPIO tree, else tell me what to do! Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 1:27 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 1:18 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > > In order to finally confine the unsafe gpiochip_get_desc() to > > drivers/gpio/, let's convert this driver to using the safer alternative > > that takes the gpio_device as argument. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > I guess you will apply this to the GPIO tree, else tell me what to do! > > Yours, > Linus Walleij I can, yes. Thank you. I'll give it some time to possibly get a Tested-by from Dialog. Bart
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.