[v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings | Patchew

[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Etienne Carriere posted 1 patch 1 year, 6 months ago

Diff against v1
Download mbox

include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Expand all Fold all

[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Etienne Carriere 1 year, 6 months ago

Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-2-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.

In CC are all the contributors to this header file.

Cc: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@foss.st.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Change request license from "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause" to
  "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause".
- Update Lee's e-mail address.
---
 include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
index 321cd08797d9..9dd15b9c743e 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause */
 /*
  * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2018 - All Rights Reserved
  * Author: Philippe Peurichard <philippe.peurichard@st.com>,
-- 
2.25.1

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Lee Jones 1 year, 5 months ago

On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:20:16 +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
> only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-2-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
> this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
> this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
> bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.
> 
> In CC are all the contributors to this header file.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings
      commit: fcd8646ca6b239aa3752c0ba818a4cda29ee2686

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Rob Herring 1 year, 5 months ago

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:20:16AM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
> only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-2-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
> this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
> this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
> bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.
> 
> In CC are all the contributors to this header file.
> 
> Cc: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>

My copy comes from b4, and looks like it fixes old addresses. Neat.

> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

The file only shows contributions from Pascal, so you don't need any 
acks for license change. For the change itself:

Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Conor Dooley 1 year, 6 months ago

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:20:16AM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
> only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-2-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
> this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
> this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
> bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.
> 
> In CC are all the contributors to this header file.
> 
> Cc: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@foss.st.com>

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Change request license from "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause" to
>   "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause".
> - Update Lee's e-mail address.
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> index 321cd08797d9..9dd15b9c743e 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause */
>  /*
>   * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2018 - All Rights Reserved
>   * Author: Philippe Peurichard <philippe.peurichard@st.com>,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Etienne CARRIERE - foss 1 year, 6 months ago

Hello Conor,

>
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2024 2:14 PM
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:33:46PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
> > only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-3-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
> > this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
> > this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
> > bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.
> >
> > In CC are all the contributors to this header file.
> >
> > Cc: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@foss.st.com>
> > ---
> >  include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > index 321cd08797d9..957c48300cd4 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
>
> The usual dual license for bindings is BSD-2-Clause, was there a
> specific request for the 3 version?

My mistake. Thanks for spotting that.
I have my company agreement for the 2 dual models: "OR BSD-2-Clause" and "OR BSD-3-Clause".
We expect to conform to DT bindings preferred licensing model. Indeed the kernel documentation explicitly mention "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause".
We prefer to conform with it. I'll update my patch.

By the way, I'll fix Lee Jones e-mail address that is deprecated.

BR,
Etienne


>
> >  /*
> >   * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2018 - All Rights Reserved
> >   * Author: Philippe Peurichard <philippe.peurichard@st.com>,
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Conor Dooley 1 year, 6 months ago

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:21:13AM +0000, Etienne CARRIERE - foss wrote:
> Hello Conor,
> 
> >
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2024 2:14 PM
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:33:46PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > > Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
> > > only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-3-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
> > > this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
> > > this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
> > > bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.
> > >
> > > In CC are all the contributors to this header file.
> > >
> > > Cc: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
> > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@foss.st.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > > index 321cd08797d9..957c48300cd4 100644
> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
> >
> > The usual dual license for bindings is BSD-2-Clause, was there a
> > specific request for the 3 version?
> 
> My mistake. Thanks for spotting that.
> I have my company agreement for the 2 dual models: "OR BSD-2-Clause" and "OR BSD-3-Clause".
> We expect to conform to DT bindings preferred licensing model. Indeed the kernel documentation explicitly mention "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause".
> We prefer to conform with it. I'll update my patch.
> 
> By the way, I'll fix Lee Jones e-mail address that is deprecated.

I figure this is a send-email mistake cos you have to do something
god-forsaken to send plaintext mail from the st mail system.

Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: dual licensing for st,stpmic1 bindings

Posted by Conor Dooley 1 year, 6 months ago

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 04:13:48PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:21:13AM +0000, Etienne CARRIERE - foss wrote:
> > Hello Conor,
> > 
> > >
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
> > > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2024 2:14 PM
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:33:46PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > > > Change include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h license model from GPLv2.0
> > > > only to dual GPLv2.0 or BSD-3-Clause. I have every legitimacy to request
> > > > this change on behalf of STMicroelectronics. This change clarifies that
> > > > this DT binding header file can be shared with software components as
> > > > bootloaders and OSes that are not published under GPLv2 terms.
> > > >
> > > > In CC are all the contributors to this header file.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@st.com>
> > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@foss.st.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > > > index 321cd08797d9..957c48300cd4 100644
> > > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.h
> > > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
> > >
> > > The usual dual license for bindings is BSD-2-Clause, was there a
> > > specific request for the 3 version?
> > 
> > My mistake. Thanks for spotting that.
> > I have my company agreement for the 2 dual models: "OR BSD-2-Clause" and "OR BSD-3-Clause".
> > We expect to conform to DT bindings preferred licensing model. Indeed the kernel documentation explicitly mention "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause".
> > We prefer to conform with it. I'll update my patch.
> > 
> > By the way, I'll fix Lee Jones e-mail address that is deprecated.
> 
> I figure this is a send-email mistake cos you have to do something
> god-forsaken to send plaintext mail from the st mail system.

"this" being that you sent a v1 reply in the thread of the v2, before
then sending it again against v1.