[PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc

Pankaj Gupta posted 5 patches 1 year, 6 months ago
[PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc
Posted by Pankaj Gupta 1 year, 6 months ago
The NXP security hardware IP(s) like: i.MX EdgeLock Enclave, V2X etc.,
creates an embedded secure enclave within the SoC boundary to enable
features like:
- HSM
- SHE
- V2X

Secure-Enclave(s) communication interface are typically via message
unit, i.e., based on mailbox linux kernel driver. This driver enables
communication ensuring well defined message sequence protocol between
Application Core and enclave's firmware.

Driver configures multiple misc-device on the MU, for multiple
user-space applications, to be able to communicate over single MU.

It exists on some i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93 etc.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml   | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 160 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..60ad1c4a3dfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: NXP i.MX HW Secure Enclave(s) EdgeLock Enclave
+
+maintainers:
+  - Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
+
+description: |
+  NXP's SoC may contain one or multiple embedded secure-enclave HW
+  IP(s) like i.MX EdgeLock Enclave, V2X etc. These NXP's HW IP(s)
+  enables features like
+    - Hardware Security Module (HSM),
+    - Security Hardware Extension (SHE), and
+    - Vehicular to Anything (V2X)
+
+  Communication interface to the secure-enclaves is based on the
+  messaging unit(s).
+
+properties:
+  $nodename:
+    pattern: "^[0-9a-z]*-if@[0-9a-f]+$"
+
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - fsl,imx8ulp-se
+      - fsl,imx93-se
+      - fsl,imx95-se
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+    description: Identifier of the communication interface to secure-enclave.
+
+  mboxes:
+    description: contain a list of phandles to mailboxes.
+    items:
+      - description: Specify the mailbox used to send message to se firmware
+      - description: Specify the mailbox used to receive message from se firmware
+
+  mbox-names:
+    items:
+      - const: tx
+      - const: rx
+      - const: txdb
+      - const: rxdb
+    minItems: 2
+
+  memory-region:
+    description: contains a list of phandles to reserved external memory.
+    items:
+      - description: It is used by secure-enclave firmware. It is an optional
+          property based on compatible and identifier to communication interface.
+          (see bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt)
+
+  sram:
+    description: contains a list of phandles to sram.
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+    items:
+      - description: Phandle to the device SRAM. It is an optional property
+          based on compatible and identifier to communication interface.
+
+allOf:
+  # memory-region
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - fsl,imx8ulp-se
+              - fsl,imx93-se
+    then:
+      required:
+        - memory-region
+    else:
+      not:
+        required:
+          - memory-region
+
+  # sram
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - fsl,imx8ulp-se
+    then:
+      required:
+        - sram
+    else:
+      not:
+        required:
+          - sram
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - mboxes
+  - mbox-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    firmware {
+      #address-cells = <1>;
+      #size-cells = <0>;
+      ele-if@0 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-se";
+        reg = <0x0>;
+        mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0>, <&s4muap 1 0>;
+        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+        sram = <&sram0>;
+        memory-region = <&ele_reserved>;
+      };
+    };
+  - |
+    firmware {
+      #address-cells = <1>;
+      #size-cells = <0>;
+      ele-if@0 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx93-se";
+        reg = <0x0>;
+        mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0>, <&s4muap 1 0>;
+        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+        memory-region = <&ele_reserved>;
+      };
+    };
+  - |
+    firmware {
+      #address-cells = <1>;
+      #size-cells = <0>;
+      ele-if@0 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
+        reg = <0x0>;
+        mboxes = <&ele_mu0 0 0>, <&ele_mu0 1 0>;
+        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+      };
+      v2x-if@3 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
+        reg = <0x3>;
+        mboxes = <&v2x_mu 0 0>, <&v2x_mu 1 0>;
+        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+      };
+      v2x-if@4 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
+        reg = <0x4>;
+        mboxes = <&v2x_mu6 0 0>, <&v2x_mu6 1 0>;
+        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+      };
+      v2x-if@5 {
+        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
+        reg = <0x5>;
+        mboxes = <&v2x_mu7 0 0>, <&v2x_mu7 1 0>;
+        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
+      };
+    };
+...

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc
Posted by Conor Dooley 1 year, 6 months ago
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:59:40PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> The NXP security hardware IP(s) like: i.MX EdgeLock Enclave, V2X etc.,
> creates an embedded secure enclave within the SoC boundary to enable
> features like:
> - HSM
> - SHE
> - V2X
> 
> Secure-Enclave(s) communication interface are typically via message
> unit, i.e., based on mailbox linux kernel driver. This driver enables
> communication ensuring well defined message sequence protocol between
> Application Core and enclave's firmware.
> 
> Driver configures multiple misc-device on the MU, for multiple
> user-space applications, to be able to communicate over single MU.
> 
> It exists on some i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93 etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml   | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 160 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..60ad1c4a3dfa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/firmware/fsl,imx-se.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP i.MX HW Secure Enclave(s) EdgeLock Enclave
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  NXP's SoC may contain one or multiple embedded secure-enclave HW
> +  IP(s) like i.MX EdgeLock Enclave, V2X etc. These NXP's HW IP(s)
> +  enables features like
> +    - Hardware Security Module (HSM),
> +    - Security Hardware Extension (SHE), and
> +    - Vehicular to Anything (V2X)
> +
> +  Communication interface to the secure-enclaves is based on the
> +  messaging unit(s).
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    pattern: "^[0-9a-z]*-if@[0-9a-f]+$"

Just "firmware@<hex>" please.

> +
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - fsl,imx8ulp-se
> +      - fsl,imx93-se
> +      - fsl,imx95-se
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +    description: Identifier of the communication interface to secure-enclave.
> +
> +  mboxes:
> +    description: contain a list of phandles to mailboxes.
> +    items:
> +      - description: Specify the mailbox used to send message to se firmware
> +      - description: Specify the mailbox used to receive message from se firmware
> +
> +  mbox-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: tx
> +      - const: rx
> +      - const: txdb
> +      - const: rxdb
> +    minItems: 2
> +
> +  memory-region:
> +    description: contains a list of phandles to reserved external memory.
> +    items:
> +      - description: It is used by secure-enclave firmware. It is an optional
> +          property based on compatible and identifier to communication interface.
> +          (see bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt)
> +
> +  sram:
> +    description: contains a list of phandles to sram.

There's only 1 phandle allowed, don't describe it as a list.
Same for memory-region.

> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> +    items:
> +      - description: Phandle to the device SRAM. It is an optional property
> +          based on compatible and identifier to communication interface.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  # memory-region
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - fsl,imx8ulp-se
> +              - fsl,imx93-se
> +    then:
> +      required:
> +        - memory-region

> +    else:
> +      not:
> +        required:
> +          - memory-region

Use

else: properties: memory-region: false

Same for sram. Sort the allOf after required.

> +
> +  # sram
> +  - if:
> +      properties:
> +        compatible:
> +          contains:
> +            enum:
> +              - fsl,imx8ulp-se
> +    then:
> +      required:
> +        - sram
> +    else:
> +      not:
> +        required:
> +          - sram
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - mboxes
> +  - mbox-names
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    firmware {

You've made up these firmware "buses" here, what purpose do they serve,
other than allowing you to have a reg property?

> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +      ele-if@0 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-se";
> +        reg = <0x0>;

What does the reg property even do? Is it ever more than 0? Can this
information be provided as a mbox cell?

> +        mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0>, <&s4muap 1 0>;
> +        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +        sram = <&sram0>;
> +        memory-region = <&ele_reserved>;
> +      };
> +    };
> +  - |
> +    firmware {

These examples are all basically the same, drop all but one.

Thanks,
Conor.

> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +      ele-if@0 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx93-se";
> +        reg = <0x0>;
> +        mboxes = <&s4muap 0 0>, <&s4muap 1 0>;
> +        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +        memory-region = <&ele_reserved>;
> +      };
> +    };
> +  - |
> +    firmware {
> +      #address-cells = <1>;
> +      #size-cells = <0>;
> +      ele-if@0 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
> +        reg = <0x0>;
> +        mboxes = <&ele_mu0 0 0>, <&ele_mu0 1 0>;
> +        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +      };
> +      v2x-if@3 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
> +        reg = <0x3>;
> +        mboxes = <&v2x_mu 0 0>, <&v2x_mu 1 0>;
> +        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +      };
> +      v2x-if@4 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
> +        reg = <0x4>;
> +        mboxes = <&v2x_mu6 0 0>, <&v2x_mu6 1 0>;
> +        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +      };
> +      v2x-if@5 {
> +        compatible = "fsl,imx95-se";
> +        reg = <0x5>;
> +        mboxes = <&v2x_mu7 0 0>, <&v2x_mu7 1 0>;
> +        mbox-names = "tx", "rx";
> +      };
> +    };
> +...
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>