virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Function kvm_reset_dirty_gfn may be called with parameters cur_slot /
cur_offset / mask are all zero, it does not represent real dirty page.
It is not necessary to clear dirty page in this condition. Also return
value of macro __fls() is undefined if mask is zero which is called in
funciton kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(). Here just discard it.
Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
---
virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
index 86d267db87bb..05f4c1c40cc7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
@@ -147,14 +147,16 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
continue;
}
}
- kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
+ if (mask)
+ kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
cur_slot = next_slot;
cur_offset = next_offset;
mask = 1;
first_round = false;
}
- kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
+ if (mask)
+ kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
/*
* The request KVM_REQ_DIRTY_RING_SOFT_FULL will be cleared
base-commit: 83a7eefedc9b56fe7bfeff13b6c7356688ffa670
--
2.39.3
Queued the alternative patch that returns early from kvm_reset_dirty_gfn, thanks. Paolo
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, Bibo Mao wrote:
> Function kvm_reset_dirty_gfn may be called with parameters cur_slot /
> cur_offset / mask are all zero, it does not represent real dirty page.
> It is not necessary to clear dirty page in this condition. Also return
> value of macro __fls() is undefined if mask is zero which is called in
> funciton kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(). Here just discard it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
> ---
> virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> index 86d267db87bb..05f4c1c40cc7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> @@ -147,14 +147,16 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
> continue;
> }
> }
> - kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
> + if (mask)
> + kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
> cur_slot = next_slot;
> cur_offset = next_offset;
> mask = 1;
> first_round = false;
> }
>
> - kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
> + if (mask)
> + kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask);
Given that mask must be checked before __fls(), just do:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
index 86d267db87bb..7bc74969a819 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ static void kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, u32 slot, u64 offset, u64 mask)
struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
int as_id, id;
+ if (!mask)
+ return;
+
as_id = slot >> 16;
id = (u16)slot;
On 2024/6/14 上午12:43, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, Bibo Mao wrote: >> Function kvm_reset_dirty_gfn may be called with parameters cur_slot / >> cur_offset / mask are all zero, it does not represent real dirty page. >> It is not necessary to clear dirty page in this condition. Also return >> value of macro __fls() is undefined if mask is zero which is called in >> funciton kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(). Here just discard it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn> >> --- >> virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c >> index 86d267db87bb..05f4c1c40cc7 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c >> @@ -147,14 +147,16 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring) >> continue; >> } >> } >> - kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask); >> + if (mask) >> + kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask); >> cur_slot = next_slot; >> cur_offset = next_offset; >> mask = 1; >> first_round = false; >> } >> >> - kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask); >> + if (mask) >> + kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(kvm, cur_slot, cur_offset, mask); > > Given that mask must be checked before __fls(), just do: That is ok for me. To be frankly I am not familiar with kvm common code, I submit this patch just when I look through the migration source code. Regards Bibo Mao > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c > index 86d267db87bb..7bc74969a819 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ static void kvm_reset_dirty_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, u32 slot, u64 offset, u64 mask) > struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot; > int as_id, id; > > + if (!mask) > + return; > + > as_id = slot >> 16; > id = (u16)slot; >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.