From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Update the comments in gswip_port_vlan_filtering() so it's clear that
there are two separate cases, one for "tag based VLAN" and another one
for "port based VLAN".
Suggested-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
index 2bbc7dd45418..ec52c62eadce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ static int gswip_port_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
}
if (vlan_filtering) {
- /* Use port based VLAN tag */
+ /* Use tag based VLAN */
gswip_switch_mask(priv,
GSWIP_PCE_VCTRL_VSR,
GSWIP_PCE_VCTRL_UVR | GSWIP_PCE_VCTRL_VIMR |
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ static int gswip_port_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
gswip_switch_mask(priv, GSWIP_PCE_PCTRL_0_TVM, 0,
GSWIP_PCE_PCTRL_0p(port));
} else {
- /* Use port based VLAN tag */
+ /* Use port based VLAN */
gswip_switch_mask(priv,
GSWIP_PCE_VCTRL_UVR | GSWIP_PCE_VCTRL_VIMR |
GSWIP_PCE_VCTRL_VEMR,
--
2.39.2