[PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop

Lance Yang posted 4 patches 1 year, 8 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Posted by Lance Yang 1 year, 8 months ago
In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
split the folio.

Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/huge_mm.h |  6 ++++++
 mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 mm/rmap.c               | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 088d66a54643..4670c6ee118b 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -415,6 +415,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
 }
 
+void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
+
 #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
 
 static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
@@ -477,6 +480,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
 static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
+static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					 unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
+					 bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
 
 #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)	\
 	do { } while (0)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index e6d26c2eb670..d2697cc8f9d4 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 	pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
 }
 
+void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
+			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
+{
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
+	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
+	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
+
+	/*
+	 * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
+	 * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
+	 * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
+	 */
+	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
+	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
+		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
+			return;
+		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
+	}
+}
+
 void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
 {
@@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 				(address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
 	ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
-
-	/*
-	 * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
-	 * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
-	 */
-	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
-	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
-
-	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
-	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
-		/*
-		 * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
-		 * guaranteed that pmd is present.
-		 */
-		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
-			goto out;
-		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
-	}
-
-out:
+	split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
 	spin_unlock(ptl);
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
 }
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index ddffa30c79fb..b77f88695588 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
 		pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
 
-	if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
-		split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
-
 	/*
 	 * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
 	 * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
@@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
 
 	while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
-		/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
-		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
-
 		/*
 		 * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
 		 */
@@ -1682,6 +1676,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			goto walk_done_err;
 		}
 
+		if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
+			/*
+			 * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
+			 * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
+			 */
+			split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
+					      false, folio);
+			flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
+			page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
+		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
+
 		pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
 		subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
 		address = pvmw.address;
-- 
2.33.1
Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Posted by David Hildenbrand 1 year, 8 months ago
On 10.06.24 14:06, Lance Yang wrote:
> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
> split the folio.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/huge_mm.h |  6 ++++++
>   mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   mm/rmap.c               | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>   3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index 088d66a54643..4670c6ee118b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -415,6 +415,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
>   	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
>   }
>   
> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> +			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
> +
>   #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>   
>   static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
> @@ -477,6 +480,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>   		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>   static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +					 unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> +					 bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>   
>   #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)	\
>   	do { } while (0)
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index e6d26c2eb670..d2697cc8f9d4 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>   	pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>   }
>   
> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> +			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> +	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);

Curious: could we actually end up here without a folio right now? That 
would mean, that try_to_unmap_one() would be called with folio==NULL.

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
> +	 * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
> +	 * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
> +	 */
> +	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> +	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> +		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> +			return;
> +		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>   		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>   {
> @@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>   				(address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>   	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>   	ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
> -	 * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
> -	 */
> -	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
> -	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> -
> -	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> -	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> -		/*
> -		 * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
> -		 * guaranteed that pmd is present.
> -		 */
> -		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> -			goto out;
> -		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
> -	}
> -
> -out:
> +	split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
>   	spin_unlock(ptl);
>   	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>   }
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index ddffa30c79fb..b77f88695588 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
>   		pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
>   
> -	if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
> -		split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
>   	 * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
> @@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>   
>   	while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> -		/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
> -		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
> -
>   		/*
>   		 * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
>   		 */
> @@ -1682,6 +1676,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   			goto walk_done_err;
>   		}
>   
> +		if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> +			 * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> +			 */
> +			split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> +					      false, folio);
> +			flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> +			page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);

If, for some reason, split_huge_pmd_locked() would fail, we would keep 
looping and never hit the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below. Maybe we'd want to 
let split_huge_pmd_locked() return whether splitting succeeded, and 
handle that case differently?

> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
> +		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
> +
>   		pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
>   		subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
>   		address = pvmw.address;

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Posted by Lance Yang 1 year, 8 months ago
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:34 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10.06.24 14:06, Lance Yang wrote:
> > In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
> > folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
> > split the folio.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/huge_mm.h |  6 ++++++
> >   mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >   mm/rmap.c               | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> >   3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index 088d66a54643..4670c6ee118b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -415,6 +415,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
> >       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
> >   }
> >
> > +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
> > +
> >   #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
> >
> >   static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
> > @@ -477,6 +480,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >               unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> >   static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >               unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> > +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                      unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> > +                                      bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
> >
> >   #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)     \
> >       do { } while (0)
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index e6d26c2eb670..d2697cc8f9d4 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >       pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
> >   }
> >
> > +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> > +                        pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
> > +{
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
> > +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> > +     VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>
> Curious: could we actually end up here without a folio right now? That
> would mean, that try_to_unmap_one() would be called with folio==NULL.

try_to_unmap_one() would not be called with folio==NULL, I guess.

I just moved 'VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio)' from __split_huge_pmd() to here,
and now __split_huge_pmd() will call split_huge_pmd_locked().

>
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
> > +      * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
> > +      * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
> > +      */
> > +     if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> > +         is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> > +             if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> > +                     return;
> > +             __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >   void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >               unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
> >   {
> > @@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> >                               (address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
> >       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> >       ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
> > -
> > -     /*
> > -      * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
> > -      * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
> > -      */
> > -     VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
> > -     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
> > -
> > -     if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
> > -         is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
> > -             /*
> > -              * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
> > -              * guaranteed that pmd is present.
> > -              */
> > -             if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
> > -                     goto out;
> > -             __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
> > -     }
> > -
> > -out:
> > +     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
> >       spin_unlock(ptl);
> >       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> >   }
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index ddffa30c79fb..b77f88695588 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >       if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
> >               pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
> >
> > -     if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
> > -             split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
> > -
> >       /*
> >        * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
> >        * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
> > @@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >       mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> >
> >       while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> > -             /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
> > -             VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
> > -
> >               /*
> >                * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
> >                */
> > @@ -1682,6 +1676,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >                       goto walk_done_err;
> >               }
> >
> > +             if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
> > +                     /*
> > +                      * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
> > +                      * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
> > +                      */
> > +                     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> > +                                           false, folio);
> > +                     flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
> > +                     page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
>
> If, for some reason, split_huge_pmd_locked() would fail, we would keep
> looping and never hit the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below. Maybe we'd want to
> let split_huge_pmd_locked() return whether splitting succeeded, and
> handle that case differently?

Hmm... after calling split_huge_pmd_locked(), we also do
"flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD", preventing re-entry into this block,
then triggering the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below if split_huge_pmd_locked()
fails, IIUC.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Lance

>
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
> > +             VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
> > +
> >               pfn = pte_pfn(ptep_get(pvmw.pte));
> >               subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
> >               address = pvmw.address;
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Posted by David Hildenbrand 1 year, 8 months ago
On 13.06.24 11:21, Lance Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:34 PM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10.06.24 14:06, Lance Yang wrote:
>>> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
>>> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
>>> split the folio.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    include/linux/huge_mm.h |  6 ++++++
>>>    mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>>    mm/rmap.c               | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>>>    3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> index 088d66a54643..4670c6ee118b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> @@ -415,6 +415,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
>>>        return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>> +                        pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
>>> +
>>>    #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>>>
>>>    static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
>>> @@ -477,6 +480,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>                unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>>    static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>                unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>> +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> +                                      unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> +                                      bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>>
>>>    #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)     \
>>>        do { } while (0)
>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> index e6d26c2eb670..d2697cc8f9d4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> @@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>        pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>> +                        pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>> +{
>>> +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
>>> +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
>>> +     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> +     VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>>
>> Curious: could we actually end up here without a folio right now? That
>> would mean, that try_to_unmap_one() would be called with folio==NULL.
> 
> try_to_unmap_one() would not be called with folio==NULL, I guess.
> 
> I just moved 'VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio)' from __split_huge_pmd() to here,
> and now __split_huge_pmd() will call split_huge_pmd_locked().

Right, on that path we could likely get !folio.

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
>>> +      * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
>>> +      * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
>>> +      */
>>> +     if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>>> +         is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>>> +             if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>>> +                     return;
>>> +             __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
>>> +     }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>                unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>                                (address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>>        mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>        ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
>>> -
>>> -     /*
>>> -      * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
>>> -      * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
>>> -      */
>>> -     VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>>> -     VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> -
>>> -     if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>>> -         is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>>> -             /*
>>> -              * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
>>> -              * guaranteed that pmd is present.
>>> -              */
>>> -             if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>>> -                     goto out;
>>> -             __split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
>>> -     }
>>> -
>>> -out:
>>> +     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
>>>        spin_unlock(ptl);
>>>        mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>>    }
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index ddffa30c79fb..b77f88695588 100644
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>        if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
>>>                pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
>>>
>>> -     if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
>>> -             split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
>>> -
>>>        /*
>>>         * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
>>>         * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
>>> @@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>        mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>
>>>        while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
>>> -             /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>>> -             VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
>>> -
>>>                /*
>>>                 * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
>>>                 */
>>> @@ -1682,6 +1676,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>                        goto walk_done_err;
>>>                }
>>>
>>> +             if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
>>> +                     /*
>>> +                      * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
>>> +                      * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
>>> +                      */
>>> +                     split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
>>> +                                           false, folio);
>>> +                     flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
>>> +                     page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
>>
>> If, for some reason, split_huge_pmd_locked() would fail, we would keep
>> looping and never hit the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below. Maybe we'd want to
>> let split_huge_pmd_locked() return whether splitting succeeded, and
>> handle that case differently?
> 
> Hmm... after calling split_huge_pmd_locked(), we also do
> "flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD", preventing re-entry into this block,
> then triggering the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below if split_huge_pmd_locked()
> fails, IIUC.
> 
> What do you think?

Missed that, you are right.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb

Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Posted by David Hildenbrand 1 year, 8 months ago
On 13.06.24 10:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 10.06.24 14:06, Lance Yang wrote:
>> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
>> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
>> split the folio.
>>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>    include/linux/huge_mm.h |  6 ++++++
>>    mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>    mm/rmap.c               | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>>    3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> index 088d66a54643..4670c6ee118b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>> @@ -415,6 +415,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
>>    	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
>>    }
>>    
>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> +			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
>> +
>>    #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>>    
>>    static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
>> @@ -477,6 +480,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>    		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>    static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>    		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>> +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> +					 unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>> +					 bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>    
>>    #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)	\
>>    	do { } while (0)
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index e6d26c2eb670..d2697cc8f9d4 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>    	pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>    }
>>    
>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> +			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>> +{
>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>> +	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
> 
> Curious: could we actually end up here without a folio right now? That
> would mean, that try_to_unmap_one() would be called with folio==NULL.
> 
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
>> +	 * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
>> +	 * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>> +	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>> +		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>> +			return;
>> +		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>    void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>    		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>    {
>> @@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>    				(address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>    	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>    	ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
>> -
>> -	/*
>> -	 * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
>> -	 * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
>> -	 */
>> -	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>> -	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>> -
>> -	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>> -	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
>> -		 * guaranteed that pmd is present.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>> -			goto out;
>> -		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
>> -	}
>> -
>> -out:
>> +	split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
>>    	spin_unlock(ptl);
>>    	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>    }
>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>> index ddffa30c79fb..b77f88695588 100644
>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>> @@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>    	if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
>>    		pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
>>    
>> -	if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
>> -		split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
>> -
>>    	/*
>>    	 * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
>>    	 * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
>> @@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>    	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>    
>>    	while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
>> -		/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>> -		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
>> -
>>    		/*
>>    		 * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
>>    		 */
>> @@ -1682,6 +1676,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>    			goto walk_done_err;
>>    		}
>>    
>> +		if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
>> +			/*
>> +			 * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
>> +			 * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
>> +			 */
>> +			split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
>> +					      false, folio);
>> +			flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
>> +			page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
> 
> If, for some reason, split_huge_pmd_locked() would fail, we would keep
> looping and never hit the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below. Maybe we'd want to
> let split_huge_pmd_locked() return whether splitting succeeded, and
> handle that case differently?

I assume it could fail if we race with concurrent split? Or isn't that 
possible?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb
Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/rmap: integrate PMD-mapped folio splitting into pagewalk loop
Posted by David Hildenbrand 1 year, 8 months ago
On 13.06.24 10:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 13.06.24 10:34, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 10.06.24 14:06, Lance Yang wrote:
>>> In preparation for supporting try_to_unmap_one() to unmap PMD-mapped
>>> folios, start the pagewalk first, then call split_huge_pmd_address() to
>>> split the folio.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>     include/linux/huge_mm.h |  6 ++++++
>>>     mm/huge_memory.c        | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>>     mm/rmap.c               | 21 +++++++++++++++------
>>>     3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> index 088d66a54643..4670c6ee118b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
>>> @@ -415,6 +415,9 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
>>>     	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION);
>>>     }
>>>     
>>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>> +			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio);
>>> +
>>>     #else /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>>>     
>>>     static inline bool folio_test_pmd_mappable(struct folio *folio)
>>> @@ -477,6 +480,9 @@ static inline void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>     		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>>     static inline void split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>     		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>> +static inline void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> +					 unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
>>> +					 bool freeze, struct folio *folio) {}
>>>     
>>>     #define split_huge_pud(__vma, __pmd, __address)	\
>>>     	do { } while (0)
>>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> index e6d26c2eb670..d2697cc8f9d4 100644
>>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>>> @@ -2581,6 +2581,27 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>     	pmd_populate(mm, pmd, pgtable);
>>>     }
>>>     
>>> +void split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>>> +			   pmd_t *pmd, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>> +{
>>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio));
>>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE));
>>> +	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> +	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>>
>> Curious: could we actually end up here without a folio right now? That
>> would mean, that try_to_unmap_one() would be called with folio==NULL.
>>
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * When the caller requests to set up a migration entry, we
>>> +	 * require a folio to check the PMD against. Otherwise, there
>>> +	 * is a risk of replacing the wrong folio.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>>> +	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>>> +		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>>> +			return;
>>> +		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, address, freeze);
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>     void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>     		unsigned long address, bool freeze, struct folio *folio)
>>>     {
>>> @@ -2592,26 +2613,7 @@ void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
>>>     				(address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>>>     	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>     	ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
>>> -
>>> -	/*
>>> -	 * If caller asks to setup a migration entry, we need a folio to check
>>> -	 * pmd against. Otherwise we can end up replacing wrong folio.
>>> -	 */
>>> -	VM_BUG_ON(freeze && !folio);
>>> -	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio && !folio_test_locked(folio));
>>> -
>>> -	if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd) || pmd_devmap(*pmd) ||
>>> -	    is_pmd_migration_entry(*pmd)) {
>>> -		/*
>>> -		 * It's safe to call pmd_page when folio is set because it's
>>> -		 * guaranteed that pmd is present.
>>> -		 */
>>> -		if (folio && folio != pmd_folio(*pmd))
>>> -			goto out;
>>> -		__split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pmd, range.start, freeze);
>>> -	}
>>> -
>>> -out:
>>> +	split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, range.start, pmd, freeze, folio);
>>>     	spin_unlock(ptl);
>>>     	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>>>     }
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index ddffa30c79fb..b77f88695588 100644
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -1640,9 +1640,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>     	if (flags & TTU_SYNC)
>>>     		pvmw.flags = PVMW_SYNC;
>>>     
>>> -	if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)
>>> -		split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, folio);
>>> -
>>>     	/*
>>>     	 * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
>>>     	 * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
>>> @@ -1668,9 +1665,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>     	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>>>     
>>>     	while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
>>> -		/* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
>>> -		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!pvmw.pte, folio);
>>> -
>>>     		/*
>>>     		 * If the folio is in an mlock()d vma, we must not swap it out.
>>>     		 */
>>> @@ -1682,6 +1676,21 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>>     			goto walk_done_err;
>>>     		}
>>>     
>>> +		if (!pvmw.pte && (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD)) {
>>> +			/*
>>> +			 * We temporarily have to drop the PTL and start once
>>> +			 * again from that now-PTE-mapped page table.
>>> +			 */
>>> +			split_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
>>> +					      false, folio);
>>> +			flags &= ~TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD;
>>> +			page_vma_mapped_walk_restart(&pvmw);
>>
>> If, for some reason, split_huge_pmd_locked() would fail, we would keep
>> looping and never hit the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO() below. Maybe we'd want to
>> let split_huge_pmd_locked() return whether splitting succeeded, and
>> handle that case differently?
> 
> I assume it could fail if we race with concurrent split? Or isn't that
> possible?
> 

(I assume we hold the PTL, so such races should not be possible)

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb