On 07.06.24 23:13, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>
> This patch leverages the new pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp() helper to optimize
> a scenario where softdirty is enabled, but the softdirty flag has already
> been set in do_swap_page(). In this situation, we can use pte_mkwrite
> instead of applying write-protection since we don't depend on write
> faults.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> ---
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index db9130488231..a063e489446d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4322,7 +4322,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> if (!folio_test_ksm(folio) &&
> (exclusive || folio_ref_count(folio) == 1)) {
> if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) && !userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, pte) &&
> - !vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma)) {
> + !pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp(vma, pte)) {
> pte = pte_mkwrite(pte, vma);
> if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
> pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb