From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>

We don't need to manually call gswip_port_enable() from within
gswip_setup() for the CPU port. DSA does this automatically for us.

Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
index fcb5929c9c88..3fd5599fca52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
@@ -898,8 +898,6 @@ static int gswip_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 
 	ds->mtu_enforcement_ingress = true;
 
-	gswip_port_enable(ds, cpu_port, NULL);
-
 	ds->configure_vlan_while_not_filtering = false;
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.39.2

On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:52:25AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote:
> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> 
> We don't need to manually call gswip_port_enable() from within
> gswip_setup() for the CPU port. DSA does this automatically for us.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> ---

Not to mention the first thing in gswip_port_enable(), which is:

	if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
		return 0;

So the call is dead code anyway.

On 2024-06-07 13:11, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:52:25AM +0200, Martin Schiller wrote:
>> From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>> 
>> We don't need to manually call gswip_port_enable() from within
>> gswip_setup() for the CPU port. DSA does this automatically for us.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl 
>> <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>> ---
> 
> Not to mention the first thing in gswip_port_enable(), which is:
> 
> 	if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
> 		return 0;
> 
> So the call is dead code anyway.

As you will have noticed, this code will be brought back to life in the 
next
patch.