[PATCH v2] resource: add a simple test for walk_iomem_res_desc()

Chia-I Wu posted 1 patch 1 year, 8 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
kernel/resource_kunit.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
[PATCH v2] resource: add a simple test for walk_iomem_res_desc()
Posted by Chia-I Wu 1 year, 8 months ago
This mainly tests that find_next_iomem_res() does not miss resources.

Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>

---
v2: update subject, use DEFINE_RES_NAMED and hardcoded offsets
---
 kernel/resource_kunit.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/resource_kunit.c b/kernel/resource_kunit.c
index 58ab9f914602..c3a3f3bdf5d5 100644
--- a/kernel/resource_kunit.c
+++ b/kernel/resource_kunit.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <kunit/test.h>
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 
 #define R0_START	0x0000
@@ -137,9 +138,75 @@ static void resource_test_intersection(struct kunit *test)
 	} while (++i < ARRAY_SIZE(results_for_intersection));
 }
 
+static int resource_walk_count(struct resource *res, void *data)
+{
+	int *count = data;
+	(*count)++;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void resource_test_walk_iomem_res_desc(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct resource root = {
+		.name = "Resource Walk Test",
+	};
+	struct resource res[8];
+	int count;
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
+			allocate_resource(&iomem_resource, &root, SZ_1M,
+				0, ~0, SZ_1M, NULL, NULL));
+
+	/* build the resource tree */
+
+	res[0] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start, SZ_1K, "SYSRAM 1",
+			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
+	res[1] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K, SZ_1K, "OTHER", 0);
+
+	res[2] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K * 3, SZ_1K, "NESTED", 0);
+	res[3] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K * 3 + SZ_512, SZ_512,
+			"SYSRAM 2", IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
+
+	res[4] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K * 4, SZ_1K, "SYSRAM 3",
+			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[0]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[1]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[2]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&res[2], &res[3]));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, request_resource(&root, &res[4]));
+
+	/* walk the entire region */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			root.start, root.end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 3);
+
+	/* walk the region requested by res[1] */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			res[1].start, res[1].end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 0);
+
+	/* walk the region requested by res[2] */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			res[2].start, res[2].end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 1);
+
+	/* walk the region requested by res[4] */
+	count = 0;
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_NONE, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
+			res[4].start, res[4].end, &count, resource_walk_count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 1);
+
+	release_resource(&root);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case resource_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(resource_test_union),
 	KUNIT_CASE(resource_test_intersection),
+	KUNIT_CASE(resource_test_walk_iomem_res_desc),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.45.1.288.g0e0cd299f1-goog
Re: [PATCH v2] resource: add a simple test for walk_iomem_res_desc()
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 1 year, 8 months ago
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 03:01:14PM -0700, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> This mainly tests that find_next_iomem_res() does not miss resources.

...

It's better, but still hard to follow, see below what I meant

> +	res[0] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start, SZ_1K, "SYSRAM 1",
> +			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
> +	res[1] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K, SZ_1K, "OTHER", 0);
> +
> +	res[2] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K * 3, SZ_1K, "NESTED", 0);
> +	res[3] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K * 3 + SZ_512, SZ_512,
> +			"SYSRAM 2", IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
> +
> +	res[4] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + SZ_1K * 4, SZ_1K, "SYSRAM 3",
> +			IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);

	res[0] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x0000, 0x0400, "SYSRAM 1",
				  IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);
	res[1] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x0400, 0x0400, "OTHER", 0);

	res[2] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x0c00, 0x0400, "NESTED", 0);
	res[3] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x0e00, 0x0200, "SYSRAM 2",
				  IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);

	res[4] = DEFINE_RES_NAMED(root.start + 0x1000, 0x0400, "SYSRAM 3",
				  IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM);

Also pay attention to indentation.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko