There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_interruptible_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/misc/apds990x.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
index 92b92be91d60..5fb29ebbb422 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/apds990x.c
@@ -625,15 +625,15 @@ static ssize_t apds990x_lux_show(struct device *dev,
 	struct apds990x_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	ssize_t ret;
 	u32 result;
-	long timeout;
+	long time_left;
 
 	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	timeout = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(chip->wait,
-						!chip->lux_wait_fresh_res,
-						msecs_to_jiffies(APDS_TIMEOUT));
-	if (!timeout)
+	time_left = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(chip->wait,
+						     !chip->lux_wait_fresh_res,
+						     msecs_to_jiffies(APDS_TIMEOUT));
+	if (!time_left)
 		return -EIO;
 
 	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
-- 
2.43.0