[PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO

Ankur Arora posted 35 patches 1 year, 8 months ago
[PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Ankur Arora 1 year, 8 months ago
Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.

The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

Changelog:
  change title
---
 include/linux/preempt.h |  2 +-
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/sched/debug.c    |  6 +++---
 kernel/sched/sched.h    |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
index d453f5e34390..d4f568606eda 100644
--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(preempt, preempt_disable(), preempt_enable())
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(preempt_notrace, preempt_disable_notrace(), preempt_enable_notrace())
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(migrate, migrate_disable(), migrate_enable())
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO)
 
 extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
 extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 349f6257fdcd..d7804e29182d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8713,9 +8713,13 @@ int __cond_resched_rwlock_write(rwlock_t *lock)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC)
+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
 #define PREEMPT_MODE "Dynamic Preempt"
+#else
+#define PREEMPT_MODE "Preempt Auto"
+#endif
 
 enum {
 	preempt_dynamic_undefined = -1,
@@ -8790,11 +8794,11 @@ PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
 PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
 PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
 
-#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
+#else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC && !CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO */
 
 static inline void preempt_dynamic_init(void) { }
 
-#endif /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
+#endif /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC && !CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
 
@@ -8925,7 +8929,26 @@ void sched_dynamic_klp_disable(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL */
 
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
+#elif defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO)
+
+static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
+{
+	switch (mode) {
+	case preempt_dynamic_none:
+		preempt_dynamic_mode = preempt_dynamic_undefined;
+		break;
+
+	case preempt_dynamic_voluntary:
+		preempt_dynamic_mode = preempt_dynamic_undefined;
+		break;
+
+	case preempt_dynamic_full:
+		preempt_dynamic_mode = preempt_dynamic_undefined;
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO */
 
 /**
  * yield - yield the current processor to other threads.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 8d5d98a5834d..e53f1b73bf4a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static const struct file_operations sched_scaling_fops = {
 
 #endif /* SMP */
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO)
 
 static ssize_t sched_dynamic_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 				   size_t cnt, loff_t *ppos)
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static const struct file_operations sched_dynamic_fops = {
 	.release	= single_release,
 };
 
-#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC */
+#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC || CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO */
 
 __read_mostly bool sched_debug_verbose;
 
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
 
 	debugfs_create_file("features", 0644, debugfs_sched, NULL, &sched_feat_fops);
 	debugfs_create_file_unsafe("verbose", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sched_debug_verbose, &sched_verbose_fops);
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO)
 	debugfs_create_file("preempt", 0644, debugfs_sched, NULL, &sched_dynamic_fops);
 #endif
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index ae50f212775e..c9239c0b0095 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3231,7 +3231,7 @@ extern void __prepare_to_swait(struct swait_queue_head *q, struct swait_queue *w
 
 extern int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int state, int wake_flags);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+#if defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO)
 extern int preempt_dynamic_mode;
 extern int sched_dynamic_mode(const char *str);
 extern void sched_dynamic_update(int mode);
-- 
2.31.1
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Peter Zijlstra 1 year, 8 months ago
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
> 
> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.

Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Ankur Arora 1 year, 8 months ago
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
>> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
>>
>> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
>
> Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
> adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?

You mean have a single __sched_dynamic_update()? AUTO doesn't use any
of the static_call/static_key stuff so I'm not sure how that would work.

Or am I missing the point of what you are saying?

--
ankur
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Peter Zijlstra 1 year, 8 months ago
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:29:45AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> 
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
> >> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
> >>
> >> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
> >
> > Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
> > adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?
> 
> You mean have a single __sched_dynamic_update()? AUTO doesn't use any
> of the static_call/static_key stuff so I'm not sure how that would work.

*sigh*... see the below, seems to work.

---
 arch/x86/Kconfig                   |   1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h |   6 +-
 include/linux/entry-common.h       |   3 +-
 include/linux/entry-kvm.h          |   5 +-
 include/linux/sched.h              |  10 +++-
 include/linux/thread_info.h        |  21 +++++--
 kernel/Kconfig.preempt             |  11 ++++
 kernel/entry/common.c              |   2 +-
 kernel/entry/kvm.c                 |   4 +-
 kernel/sched/core.c                | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/sched/debug.c               |   2 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c                |   4 +-
 kernel/sched/sched.h               |   1 +
 13 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index e8837116704ce..61f86b69524d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ config X86
 	select ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
 	select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
 	select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API		if X86_64
+	select ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
 	select ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP		if X86_64
 	select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
 	select ARCH_HAS_HW_PTE_YOUNG
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 12da7dfd5ef13..75bb390f7baf5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -87,8 +87,9 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	1	/* callback before returning to user */
 #define TIF_SIGPENDING		2	/* signal pending */
 #define TIF_NEED_RESCHED	3	/* rescheduling necessary */
-#define TIF_SINGLESTEP		4	/* reenable singlestep on user return*/
-#define TIF_SSBD		5	/* Speculative store bypass disable */
+#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY	4	/* rescheduling necessary */
+#define TIF_SINGLESTEP		5	/* reenable singlestep on user return*/
+#define TIF_SSBD		6	/* Speculative store bypass disable */
 #define TIF_SPEC_IB		9	/* Indirect branch speculation mitigation */
 #define TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH	10	/* Flush L1D on mm switches (processes) */
 #define TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY	11	/* notify kernel of userspace return */
@@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ struct thread_info {
 #define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
 #define _TIF_SIGPENDING		(1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
 #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED	(1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY	(1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
 #define _TIF_SINGLESTEP		(1 << TIF_SINGLESTEP)
 #define _TIF_SSBD		(1 << TIF_SSBD)
 #define _TIF_SPEC_IB		(1 << TIF_SPEC_IB)
diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
index b0fb775a600d9..e66c8a7c113f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
 
 #define EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK						\
 	(_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_UPROBE |		\
-	 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL |	\
+	 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY |			\
+	 _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL |			\
 	 ARCH_EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK)
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
index 6813171afccb2..16149f6625e48 100644
--- a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
+++ b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@
 #endif
 
 #define XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK						\
-	(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL |	\
-	 _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | ARCH_XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK)
+	(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
+	 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME |			\
+	 ARCH_XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK)
 
 struct kvm_vcpu;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 7635045b2395c..5900d84e08b3c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1968,7 +1968,8 @@ static inline void set_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
 
 static inline void clear_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
+	atomic_long_andnot(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY,
+			   (atomic_long_t *)&task_thread_info(tsk)->flags);
 }
 
 static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
@@ -2074,6 +2075,7 @@ extern int __cond_resched_rwlock_write(rwlock_t *lock);
 extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
 extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
 extern bool preempt_model_full(void);
+extern bool preempt_model_lazy(void);
 
 #else
 
@@ -2089,6 +2091,10 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_full(void)
 {
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT);
 }
+static inline bool preempt_model_lazy(void)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY);
+}
 
 #endif
 
@@ -2107,7 +2113,7 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_rt(void)
  */
 static inline bool preempt_model_preemptible(void)
 {
-	return preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_rt();
+	return preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_lazy() || preempt_model_rt();
 }
 
 static __always_inline bool need_resched(void)
diff --git a/include/linux/thread_info.h b/include/linux/thread_info.h
index 9ea0b28068f49..cf2446c9c30d4 100644
--- a/include/linux/thread_info.h
+++ b/include/linux/thread_info.h
@@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ enum syscall_work_bit {
 
 #include <asm/thread_info.h>
 
+#ifndef TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
+#error Inconsistent PREEMPT_LAZY
+#endif
+#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY TIF_NEED_RESCHED
+#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
+#endif
+
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
 #ifndef arch_set_restart_data
@@ -179,22 +187,27 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long read_ti_thread_flags(struct thread_info *ti
 
 #ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H
 
-static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool tif_test_bit(int bit)
 {
-	return arch_test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED,
+	return arch_test_bit(bit,
 			     (unsigned long *)(&current_thread_info()->flags));
 }
 
 #else
 
-static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
+static __always_inline bool tif_test_bit(int bit)
 {
-	return test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED,
+	return test_bit(bit,
 			(unsigned long *)(&current_thread_info()->flags));
 }
 
 #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H */
 
+static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
+{
+	return tif_test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
+}
+
 #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES
 static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
 					   const void * const stackend,
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index c2f1fd95a8214..1a2e3849e3e5f 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ config PREEMPT_BUILD
 	select PREEMPTION
 	select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
 
+config ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
+	bool
+
 choice
 	prompt "Preemption Model"
 	default PREEMPT_NONE
@@ -67,6 +70,14 @@ config PREEMPT
 	  embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds
 	  range.
 
+config PREEMPT_LAZY
+	bool "Scheduler controlled preemption model"
+	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
+	depends on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
+	select PREEMPT_BUILD
+	help
+	  Hamsters in your brain...
+
 config PREEMPT_RT
 	bool "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)"
 	depends on EXPERT && ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
index 90843cc385880..bcb23c866425e 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ __always_inline unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
 
 		local_irq_enable_exit_to_user(ti_work);
 
-		if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+		if (ti_work & (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
 			schedule();
 
 		if (ti_work & _TIF_UPROBE)
diff --git a/kernel/entry/kvm.c b/kernel/entry/kvm.c
index 2e0f75bcb7fd1..8485f63863afc 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/kvm.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/kvm.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static int xfer_to_guest_mode_work(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ti_work)
 			return -EINTR;
 		}
 
-		if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+		if (ti_work & (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
 			schedule();
 
 		if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static int xfer_to_guest_mode_work(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ti_work)
 			return ret;
 
 		ti_work = read_thread_flags();
-	} while (ti_work & XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK || need_resched());
+	} while (ti_work & XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 965e6464e68e9..c32de809283cf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -904,10 +904,9 @@ static inline void hrtick_rq_init(struct rq *rq)
  * this avoids any races wrt polling state changes and thereby avoids
  * spurious IPIs.
  */
-static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct thread_info *ti, int tif)
 {
-	struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(p);
-	return !(fetch_or(&ti->flags, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) & _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
+	return !(fetch_or(&ti->flags, 1 << tif) & _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -932,9 +931,9 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
 }
 
 #else
-static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct thread_info *ti, int tif)
 {
-	set_tsk_need_resched(p);
+	atomic_long_or(1 << tif, (atomic_long_t *)&ti->flags);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1039,28 +1038,66 @@ void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
  * might also involve a cross-CPU call to trigger the scheduler on
  * the target CPU.
  */
-void resched_curr(struct rq *rq)
+static void __resched_curr(struct rq *rq, int tif)
 {
 	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
+	struct thread_info *cti = task_thread_info(curr);
 	int cpu;
 
 	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
 
-	if (test_tsk_need_resched(curr))
+	if (is_idle_task(curr) && tif == TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
+		tif = TIF_NEED_RESCHED;
+
+	if (cti->flags & ((1 << tif) | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED))
 		return;
 
 	cpu = cpu_of(rq);
 
 	if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
-		set_tsk_need_resched(curr);
-		set_preempt_need_resched();
+		set_ti_thread_flag(cti, tif);
+		if (tif == TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+			set_preempt_need_resched();
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(curr))
-		smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
-	else
+	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(cti, tif)) {
+		if (tif == TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
+			smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+	} else {
 		trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
+	}
+}
+
+void resched_curr(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	__resched_curr(rq, TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sk_dynamic_preempt_lazy);
+static __always_inline bool dynamic_preempt_lazy(void)
+{
+	return static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_preempt_lazy);
+}
+#else
+static __always_inline bool dynamic_preempt_lazy(void)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(PREEMPT_LAZY);
+}
+#endif
+
+static __always_inline int tif_need_resched_lazy(void)
+{
+	if (dynamic_preempt_lazy())
+		return TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY;
+
+	return TIF_NEED_RESCHED;
+}
+
+void resched_curr_lazy(struct rq *rq)
+{
+	__resched_curr(rq, tif_need_resched_lazy());
 }
 
 void resched_cpu(int cpu)
@@ -1155,7 +1192,7 @@ static void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu)
 	 * and testing of the above solutions didn't appear to report
 	 * much benefits.
 	 */
-	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(rq->idle))
+	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(task_thread_info(rq->idle), TIF_NEED_RESCHED))
 		smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
 	else
 		trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
@@ -5537,6 +5574,10 @@ void sched_tick(void)
 	update_rq_clock(rq);
 	hw_pressure = arch_scale_hw_pressure(cpu_of(rq));
 	update_hw_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, hw_pressure);
+
+	if (dynamic_preempt_lazy() && tif_test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
+		resched_curr(rq);
+
 	curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
 	if (sched_feat(LATENCY_WARN))
 		resched_latency = cpu_resched_latency(rq);
@@ -7245,6 +7286,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
  *   preempt_schedule           <- NOP
  *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- NOP
  *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- NOP
+ *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- false
  *
  * VOLUNTARY:
  *   cond_resched               <- __cond_resched
@@ -7252,6 +7294,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
  *   preempt_schedule           <- NOP
  *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- NOP
  *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- NOP
+ *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- false
  *
  * FULL:
  *   cond_resched               <- RET0
@@ -7259,6 +7302,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
  *   preempt_schedule           <- preempt_schedule
  *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- preempt_schedule_notrace
  *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- irqentry_exit_cond_resched
+ *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- false
+ *
+ * LAZY:
+ *   cond_resched               <- RET0
+ *   might_resched              <- RET0
+ *   preempt_schedule           <- preempt_schedule
+ *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- preempt_schedule_notrace
+ *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- irqentry_exit_cond_resched
+ *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- true
  */
 
 enum {
@@ -7266,6 +7318,7 @@ enum {
 	preempt_dynamic_none,
 	preempt_dynamic_voluntary,
 	preempt_dynamic_full,
+	preempt_dynamic_lazy,
 };
 
 int preempt_dynamic_mode = preempt_dynamic_undefined;
@@ -7281,15 +7334,23 @@ int sched_dynamic_mode(const char *str)
 	if (!strcmp(str, "full"))
 		return preempt_dynamic_full;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
+	if (!strcmp(str, "lazy"))
+		return preempt_dynamic_lazy;
+#endif
+
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+#define preempt_dynamic_key_enable(f)	static_key_enable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
+#define preempt_dynamic_key_disable(f)	static_key_disable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL)
 #define preempt_dynamic_enable(f)	static_call_update(f, f##_dynamic_enabled)
 #define preempt_dynamic_disable(f)	static_call_update(f, f##_dynamic_disabled)
 #elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY)
-#define preempt_dynamic_enable(f)	static_key_enable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
-#define preempt_dynamic_disable(f)	static_key_disable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
+#define preempt_dynamic_enable(f)	preempt_dynamic_key_enable(f)
+#define preempt_dynamic_disable(f)	preempt_dynamic_key_disable(f)
 #else
 #error "Unsupported PREEMPT_DYNAMIC mechanism"
 #endif
@@ -7309,6 +7370,7 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
 	preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
 	preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
 	preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
+	preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
 
 	switch (mode) {
 	case preempt_dynamic_none:
@@ -7318,6 +7380,7 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
 		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule);
 		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
 		preempt_dynamic_disable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
+		preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
 		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
 			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: none\n");
 		break;
@@ -7329,6 +7392,7 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
 		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule);
 		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
 		preempt_dynamic_disable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
+		preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
 		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
 			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: voluntary\n");
 		break;
@@ -7340,9 +7404,22 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
 		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
 		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
 		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
+		preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
 		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
 			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: full\n");
 		break;
+
+	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
+		if (!klp_override)
+			preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
+		preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
+		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
+		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
+		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
+		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
+		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
+			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
+		break;
 	}
 
 	preempt_dynamic_mode = mode;
@@ -7405,6 +7482,8 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
 			sched_dynamic_update(preempt_dynamic_none);
 		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY)) {
 			sched_dynamic_update(preempt_dynamic_voluntary);
+		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY)) {
+			sched_dynamic_update(preempt_dynamic_lazy);
 		} else {
 			/* Default static call setting, nothing to do */
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT));
@@ -7425,6 +7504,7 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
 PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
 PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
 PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
+PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(lazy);
 
 #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC: */
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 1bc24410ae501..87309cf247c68 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_dynamic_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 static int sched_dynamic_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	static const char * preempt_modes[] = {
-		"none", "voluntary", "full"
+		"none", "voluntary", "full", "lazy",
 	};
 	int i;
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5b5d50dbc79dc..71b4112cadde0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 	 * The task has consumed its request, reschedule.
 	 */
 	if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
-		resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
+		resched_curr_lazy(rq_of(cfs_rq));
 		clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
 	}
 }
@@ -8615,7 +8615,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
 	return;
 
 preempt:
-	resched_curr(rq);
+	resched_curr_lazy(rq);
 }
 
 static struct task_struct *pick_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 041d8e00a1568..48a4617a5b28b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2494,6 +2494,7 @@ extern void init_sched_fair_class(void);
 extern void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio);
 
 extern void resched_curr(struct rq *rq);
+extern void resched_curr_lazy(struct rq *rq);
 extern void resched_cpu(int cpu);
 
 extern struct rt_bandwidth def_rt_bandwidth;
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Ankur Arora 1 year, 8 months ago
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:29:45AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> >> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
>> >> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
>> >>
>> >> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
>> >
>> > Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
>> > adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?
>>
>> You mean have a single __sched_dynamic_update()? AUTO doesn't use any
>> of the static_call/static_key stuff so I'm not sure how that would work.
>
> *sigh*... see the below, seems to work.

Sorry, didn't mean for you to have to do all that work to prove the
point.

I phrased it badly. I do understand how lazy can be folded in as
you do here:

> +	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> +		if (!klp_override)
> +			preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> +		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
> +		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> +			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
> +		break;
>  	}

But, if the long term goal (at least as I understand it) is to get rid
of cond_resched() -- to allow optimizations that needing to call cond_resched()
makes impossible -- does it make sense to pull all of these together?

Say, eventually preempt_dynamic_lazy and preempt_dynamic_full are the
only two models left. Then we will have (modulo figuring out how to
switch over klp from cond_resched() to a different unwinding technique):

static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
{
        preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
        preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
        preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);

        switch (mode) {
        case preempt_dynamic_full:
                preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
                if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
                        pr_info("%s: full\n", PREEMPT_MODE);
                break;

	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
		break;
        }

        preempt_dynamic_mode = mode;
}

Which is pretty similar to what the PREEMPT_AUTO code was doing.

Thanks
Ankur

> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                   |   1 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h |   6 +-
>  include/linux/entry-common.h       |   3 +-
>  include/linux/entry-kvm.h          |   5 +-
>  include/linux/sched.h              |  10 +++-
>  include/linux/thread_info.h        |  21 +++++--
>  kernel/Kconfig.preempt             |  11 ++++
>  kernel/entry/common.c              |   2 +-
>  kernel/entry/kvm.c                 |   4 +-
>  kernel/sched/core.c                | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  kernel/sched/debug.c               |   2 +-
>  kernel/sched/fair.c                |   4 +-
>  kernel/sched/sched.h               |   1 +
>  13 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index e8837116704ce..61f86b69524d7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ config X86
>  	select ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
>  	select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE
>  	select ARCH_HAS_PMEM_API		if X86_64
> +	select ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
>  	select ARCH_HAS_PTE_DEVMAP		if X86_64
>  	select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
>  	select ARCH_HAS_HW_PTE_YOUNG
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 12da7dfd5ef13..75bb390f7baf5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -87,8 +87,9 @@ struct thread_info {
>  #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	1	/* callback before returning to user */
>  #define TIF_SIGPENDING		2	/* signal pending */
>  #define TIF_NEED_RESCHED	3	/* rescheduling necessary */
> -#define TIF_SINGLESTEP		4	/* reenable singlestep on user return*/
> -#define TIF_SSBD		5	/* Speculative store bypass disable */
> +#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY	4	/* rescheduling necessary */
> +#define TIF_SINGLESTEP		5	/* reenable singlestep on user return*/
> +#define TIF_SSBD		6	/* Speculative store bypass disable */
>  #define TIF_SPEC_IB		9	/* Indirect branch speculation mitigation */
>  #define TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH	10	/* Flush L1D on mm switches (processes) */
>  #define TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY	11	/* notify kernel of userspace return */
> @@ -110,6 +111,7 @@ struct thread_info {
>  #define _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	(1 << TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
>  #define _TIF_SIGPENDING		(1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
>  #define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED	(1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> +#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY	(1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
>  #define _TIF_SINGLESTEP		(1 << TIF_SINGLESTEP)
>  #define _TIF_SSBD		(1 << TIF_SSBD)
>  #define _TIF_SPEC_IB		(1 << TIF_SPEC_IB)
> diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> index b0fb775a600d9..e66c8a7c113f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
> +++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
>
>  #define EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK						\
>  	(_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_UPROBE |		\
> -	 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL |	\
> +	 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY |			\
> +	 _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL |			\
>  	 ARCH_EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK)
>
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> index 6813171afccb2..16149f6625e48 100644
> --- a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> @@ -17,8 +17,9 @@
>  #endif
>
>  #define XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK						\
> -	(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL |	\
> -	 _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | ARCH_XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK)
> +	(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
> +	 _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME |			\
> +	 ARCH_XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK)
>
>  struct kvm_vcpu;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 7635045b2395c..5900d84e08b3c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1968,7 +1968,8 @@ static inline void set_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
>  static inline void clear_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> -	clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
> +	atomic_long_andnot(_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY,
> +			   (atomic_long_t *)&task_thread_info(tsk)->flags);
>  }
>
>  static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
> @@ -2074,6 +2075,7 @@ extern int __cond_resched_rwlock_write(rwlock_t *lock);
>  extern bool preempt_model_none(void);
>  extern bool preempt_model_voluntary(void);
>  extern bool preempt_model_full(void);
> +extern bool preempt_model_lazy(void);
>
>  #else
>
> @@ -2089,6 +2091,10 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_full(void)
>  {
>  	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT);
>  }
> +static inline bool preempt_model_lazy(void)
> +{
> +	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY);
> +}
>
>  #endif
>
> @@ -2107,7 +2113,7 @@ static inline bool preempt_model_rt(void)
>   */
>  static inline bool preempt_model_preemptible(void)
>  {
> -	return preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_rt();
> +	return preempt_model_full() || preempt_model_lazy() || preempt_model_rt();
>  }
>
>  static __always_inline bool need_resched(void)
> diff --git a/include/linux/thread_info.h b/include/linux/thread_info.h
> index 9ea0b28068f49..cf2446c9c30d4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thread_info.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thread_info.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ enum syscall_work_bit {
>
>  #include <asm/thread_info.h>
>
> +#ifndef TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
> +#error Inconsistent PREEMPT_LAZY
> +#endif
> +#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> +#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
>  #ifndef arch_set_restart_data
> @@ -179,22 +187,27 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long read_ti_thread_flags(struct thread_info *ti
>
>  #ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H
>
> -static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
> +static __always_inline bool tif_test_bit(int bit)
>  {
> -	return arch_test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED,
> +	return arch_test_bit(bit,
>  			     (unsigned long *)(&current_thread_info()->flags));
>  }
>
>  #else
>
> -static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
> +static __always_inline bool tif_test_bit(int bit)
>  {
> -	return test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED,
> +	return test_bit(bit,
>  			(unsigned long *)(&current_thread_info()->flags));
>  }
>
>  #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H */
>
> +static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
> +{
> +	return tif_test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
> +}
> +
>  #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_WITHIN_STACK_FRAMES
>  static inline int arch_within_stack_frames(const void * const stack,
>  					   const void * const stackend,
> diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> index c2f1fd95a8214..1a2e3849e3e5f 100644
> --- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ config PREEMPT_BUILD
>  	select PREEMPTION
>  	select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
> +	bool
> +
>  choice
>  	prompt "Preemption Model"
>  	default PREEMPT_NONE
> @@ -67,6 +70,14 @@ config PREEMPT
>  	  embedded system with latency requirements in the milliseconds
>  	  range.
>
> +config PREEMPT_LAZY
> +	bool "Scheduler controlled preemption model"
> +	depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
> +	depends on ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
> +	select PREEMPT_BUILD
> +	help
> +	  Hamsters in your brain...
> +
>  config PREEMPT_RT
>  	bool "Fully Preemptible Kernel (Real-Time)"
>  	depends on EXPERT && ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index 90843cc385880..bcb23c866425e 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ __always_inline unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
>
>  		local_irq_enable_exit_to_user(ti_work);
>
> -		if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> +		if (ti_work & (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
>  			schedule();
>
>  		if (ti_work & _TIF_UPROBE)
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/kvm.c b/kernel/entry/kvm.c
> index 2e0f75bcb7fd1..8485f63863afc 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/kvm.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/kvm.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static int xfer_to_guest_mode_work(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ti_work)
>  			return -EINTR;
>  		}
>
> -		if (ti_work & _TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> +		if (ti_work & (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
>  			schedule();
>
>  		if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static int xfer_to_guest_mode_work(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ti_work)
>  			return ret;
>
>  		ti_work = read_thread_flags();
> -	} while (ti_work & XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK || need_resched());
> +	} while (ti_work & XFER_TO_GUEST_MODE_WORK);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 965e6464e68e9..c32de809283cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -904,10 +904,9 @@ static inline void hrtick_rq_init(struct rq *rq)
>   * this avoids any races wrt polling state changes and thereby avoids
>   * spurious IPIs.
>   */
> -static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> +static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct thread_info *ti, int tif)
>  {
> -	struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(p);
> -	return !(fetch_or(&ti->flags, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED) & _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
> +	return !(fetch_or(&ti->flags, 1 << tif) & _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -932,9 +931,9 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
>  }
>
>  #else
> -static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> +static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct thread_info *ti, int tif)
>  {
> -	set_tsk_need_resched(p);
> +	atomic_long_or(1 << tif, (atomic_long_t *)&ti->flags);
>  	return true;
>  }
>
> @@ -1039,28 +1038,66 @@ void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
>   * might also involve a cross-CPU call to trigger the scheduler on
>   * the target CPU.
>   */
> -void resched_curr(struct rq *rq)
> +static void __resched_curr(struct rq *rq, int tif)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
> +	struct thread_info *cti = task_thread_info(curr);
>  	int cpu;
>
>  	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>
> -	if (test_tsk_need_resched(curr))
> +	if (is_idle_task(curr) && tif == TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY)
> +		tif = TIF_NEED_RESCHED;
> +
> +	if (cti->flags & ((1 << tif) | _TIF_NEED_RESCHED))
>  		return;
>
>  	cpu = cpu_of(rq);
>
>  	if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
> -		set_tsk_need_resched(curr);
> -		set_preempt_need_resched();
> +		set_ti_thread_flag(cti, tif);
> +		if (tif == TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> +			set_preempt_need_resched();
>  		return;
>  	}
>
> -	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(curr))
> -		smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
> -	else
> +	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(cti, tif)) {
> +		if (tif == TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
> +			smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
> +	} else {
>  		trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void resched_curr(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	__resched_curr(rq, TIF_NEED_RESCHED);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sk_dynamic_preempt_lazy);
> +static __always_inline bool dynamic_preempt_lazy(void)
> +{
> +	return static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_preempt_lazy);
> +}
> +#else
> +static __always_inline bool dynamic_preempt_lazy(void)
> +{
> +	return IS_ENABLED(PREEMPT_LAZY);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static __always_inline int tif_need_resched_lazy(void)
> +{
> +	if (dynamic_preempt_lazy())
> +		return TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY;
> +
> +	return TIF_NEED_RESCHED;
> +}
> +
> +void resched_curr_lazy(struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +	__resched_curr(rq, tif_need_resched_lazy());
>  }
>
>  void resched_cpu(int cpu)
> @@ -1155,7 +1192,7 @@ static void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu)
>  	 * and testing of the above solutions didn't appear to report
>  	 * much benefits.
>  	 */
> -	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(rq->idle))
> +	if (set_nr_and_not_polling(task_thread_info(rq->idle), TIF_NEED_RESCHED))
>  		smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
>  	else
>  		trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi(cpu);
> @@ -5537,6 +5574,10 @@ void sched_tick(void)
>  	update_rq_clock(rq);
>  	hw_pressure = arch_scale_hw_pressure(cpu_of(rq));
>  	update_hw_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, hw_pressure);
> +
> +	if (dynamic_preempt_lazy() && tif_test_bit(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))
> +		resched_curr(rq);
> +
>  	curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr, 0);
>  	if (sched_feat(LATENCY_WARN))
>  		resched_latency = cpu_resched_latency(rq);
> @@ -7245,6 +7286,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
>   *   preempt_schedule           <- NOP
>   *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- NOP
>   *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- NOP
> + *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- false
>   *
>   * VOLUNTARY:
>   *   cond_resched               <- __cond_resched
> @@ -7252,6 +7294,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
>   *   preempt_schedule           <- NOP
>   *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- NOP
>   *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- NOP
> + *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- false
>   *
>   * FULL:
>   *   cond_resched               <- RET0
> @@ -7259,6 +7302,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rwlock_write);
>   *   preempt_schedule           <- preempt_schedule
>   *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- preempt_schedule_notrace
>   *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- irqentry_exit_cond_resched
> + *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- false
> + *
> + * LAZY:
> + *   cond_resched               <- RET0
> + *   might_resched              <- RET0
> + *   preempt_schedule           <- preempt_schedule
> + *   preempt_schedule_notrace   <- preempt_schedule_notrace
> + *   irqentry_exit_cond_resched <- irqentry_exit_cond_resched
> + *   dynamic_preempt_lazy	<- true
>   */
>
>  enum {
> @@ -7266,6 +7318,7 @@ enum {
>  	preempt_dynamic_none,
>  	preempt_dynamic_voluntary,
>  	preempt_dynamic_full,
> +	preempt_dynamic_lazy,
>  };
>
>  int preempt_dynamic_mode = preempt_dynamic_undefined;
> @@ -7281,15 +7334,23 @@ int sched_dynamic_mode(const char *str)
>  	if (!strcmp(str, "full"))
>  		return preempt_dynamic_full;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PREEMPT_LAZY
> +	if (!strcmp(str, "lazy"))
> +		return preempt_dynamic_lazy;
> +#endif
> +
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>
> +#define preempt_dynamic_key_enable(f)	static_key_enable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
> +#define preempt_dynamic_key_disable(f)	static_key_disable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
> +
>  #if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL)
>  #define preempt_dynamic_enable(f)	static_call_update(f, f##_dynamic_enabled)
>  #define preempt_dynamic_disable(f)	static_call_update(f, f##_dynamic_disabled)
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY)
> -#define preempt_dynamic_enable(f)	static_key_enable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
> -#define preempt_dynamic_disable(f)	static_key_disable(&sk_dynamic_##f.key)
> +#define preempt_dynamic_enable(f)	preempt_dynamic_key_enable(f)
> +#define preempt_dynamic_disable(f)	preempt_dynamic_key_disable(f)
>  #else
>  #error "Unsupported PREEMPT_DYNAMIC mechanism"
>  #endif
> @@ -7309,6 +7370,7 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
>  	preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
>  	preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>  	preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +	preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
>
>  	switch (mode) {
>  	case preempt_dynamic_none:
> @@ -7318,6 +7380,7 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
>  		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule);
>  		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>  		preempt_dynamic_disable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
>  		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>  			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: none\n");
>  		break;
> @@ -7329,6 +7392,7 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
>  		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule);
>  		preempt_dynamic_disable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>  		preempt_dynamic_disable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
>  		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>  			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: voluntary\n");
>  		break;
> @@ -7340,9 +7404,22 @@ static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
>  		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
>  		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>  		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
>  		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>  			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: full\n");
>  		break;
> +
> +	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> +		if (!klp_override)
> +			preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> +		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> +		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
> +		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> +			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
> +		break;
>  	}
>
>  	preempt_dynamic_mode = mode;
> @@ -7405,6 +7482,8 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
>  			sched_dynamic_update(preempt_dynamic_none);
>  		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY)) {
>  			sched_dynamic_update(preempt_dynamic_voluntary);
> +		} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY)) {
> +			sched_dynamic_update(preempt_dynamic_lazy);
>  		} else {
>  			/* Default static call setting, nothing to do */
>  			WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT));
> @@ -7425,6 +7504,7 @@ static void __init preempt_dynamic_init(void)
>  PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(none);
>  PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(voluntary);
>  PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(full);
> +PREEMPT_MODEL_ACCESSOR(lazy);
>
>  #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC: */
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 1bc24410ae501..87309cf247c68 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_dynamic_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>  static int sched_dynamic_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  {
>  	static const char * preempt_modes[] = {
> -		"none", "voluntary", "full"
> +		"none", "voluntary", "full", "lazy",
>  	};
>  	int i;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 5b5d50dbc79dc..71b4112cadde0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static void update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>  	 * The task has consumed its request, reschedule.
>  	 */
>  	if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
> -		resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
> +		resched_curr_lazy(rq_of(cfs_rq));
>  		clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -8615,7 +8615,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
>  	return;
>
>  preempt:
> -	resched_curr(rq);
> +	resched_curr_lazy(rq);
>  }
>
>  static struct task_struct *pick_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 041d8e00a1568..48a4617a5b28b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -2494,6 +2494,7 @@ extern void init_sched_fair_class(void);
>  extern void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio);
>
>  extern void resched_curr(struct rq *rq);
> +extern void resched_curr_lazy(struct rq *rq);
>  extern void resched_cpu(int cpu);
>
>  extern struct rt_bandwidth def_rt_bandwidth;


--
ankur
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Peter Zijlstra 1 year, 8 months ago
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 08:11:41AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> 
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:29:45AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >>
> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >> >> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
> >> >> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
> >> >>
> >> >> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
> >> >
> >> > Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
> >> > adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?
> >>
> >> You mean have a single __sched_dynamic_update()? AUTO doesn't use any
> >> of the static_call/static_key stuff so I'm not sure how that would work.
> >
> > *sigh*... see the below, seems to work.
> 
> Sorry, didn't mean for you to have to do all that work to prove the
> point.

Well, for a large part it was needed for me to figure out what your
patches were actually doing anyway. Peel away all the layers and this is
what remains.

> I phrased it badly. I do understand how lazy can be folded in as
> you do here:
> 
> > +	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> > +		if (!klp_override)
> > +			preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
> > +		preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> > +		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
> > +		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> > +			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
> > +		break;
> >  	}
> 
> But, if the long term goal (at least as I understand it) is to get rid
> of cond_resched() -- to allow optimizations that needing to call cond_resched()
> makes impossible -- does it make sense to pull all of these together?

It certainly doesn't make sense to add yet another configurable thing. We
have one, so yes add it here.

> Say, eventually preempt_dynamic_lazy and preempt_dynamic_full are the
> only two models left. Then we will have (modulo figuring out how to
> switch over klp from cond_resched() to a different unwinding technique):
> 
> static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
> {
>         preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
>         preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>         preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> 
>         switch (mode) {
>         case preempt_dynamic_full:
>                 preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
>                 if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>                         pr_info("%s: full\n", PREEMPT_MODE);
>                 break;
> 
> 	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> 		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
> 		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> 			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
> 		break;
>         }
> 
>         preempt_dynamic_mode = mode;
> }
> 
> Which is pretty similar to what the PREEMPT_AUTO code was doing.

Right, but without duplicating all that stuff in the interim.
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Ankur Arora 1 year, 8 months ago
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 08:11:41AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:29:45AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> >> >> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
>> >> >> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
>> >> >
>> >> > Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
>> >> > adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?
>> >>
>> >> You mean have a single __sched_dynamic_update()? AUTO doesn't use any
>> >> of the static_call/static_key stuff so I'm not sure how that would work.
>> >
>> > *sigh*... see the below, seems to work.
>>
>> Sorry, didn't mean for you to have to do all that work to prove the
>> point.
>
> Well, for a large part it was needed for me to figure out what your
> patches were actually doing anyway. Peel away all the layers and this is
> what remains.
>
>> I phrased it badly. I do understand how lazy can be folded in as
>> you do here:
>>
>> > +	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
>> > +		if (!klp_override)
>> > +			preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
>> > +		preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
>> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
>> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
>> > +		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
>> > +		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>> > +			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
>> > +		break;
>> >  	}
>>
>> But, if the long term goal (at least as I understand it) is to get rid
>> of cond_resched() -- to allow optimizations that needing to call cond_resched()
>> makes impossible -- does it make sense to pull all of these together?
>
> It certainly doesn't make sense to add yet another configurable thing. We
> have one, so yes add it here.
>
>> Say, eventually preempt_dynamic_lazy and preempt_dynamic_full are the
>> only two models left. Then we will have (modulo figuring out how to
>> switch over klp from cond_resched() to a different unwinding technique):
>>
>> static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
>> {
>>         preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
>>         preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
>>         preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
>>
>>         switch (mode) {
>>         case preempt_dynamic_full:
>>                 preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
>>                 if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>>                         pr_info("%s: full\n", PREEMPT_MODE);
>>                 break;
>>
>> 	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
>> 		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
>> 		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
>> 			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
>> 		break;
>>         }
>>
>>         preempt_dynamic_mode = mode;
>> }
>>
>> Which is pretty similar to what the PREEMPT_AUTO code was doing.
>
> Right, but without duplicating all that stuff in the interim.

Yeah, that makes sense. Joel had suggested something on these lines
earlier [1], to which I was resistant.

However, the duplication (and the fact that the voluntary model
was quite thin) should have told me that (AUTO, preempt=voluntary)
should just be folded under PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.

I'll rework the series to do that.

That should also simplify RCU related choices which I think Paul will
like. Given that the lazy model is meant to eventually replace
none/voluntary, so PREEMPT_RCU configuration can just be:

--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config TREE_RCU

 config PREEMPT_RCU
        bool
-       default y if PREEMPTION
+       default y if PREEMPTION && !PREEMPT_LAZY


Or, maybe we should instead have this:

--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config TREE_RCU

 config PREEMPT_RCU
        bool
-       default y if PREEMPTION
+       default y if PREEMPT || PREEMPT_RT
        select TREE_RCU

Though this would be a change in behaviour for current PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
users.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fd48ea5c-bc74-4914-a621-d12c9741c014@joelfernandes.org/

Thanks
--
ankur
Re: [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO
Posted by Paul E. McKenney 1 year, 8 months ago
On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 05:46:26PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 08:11:41AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> >> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 02:29:45AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >> >> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> >> >> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:34:59PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >> >> >> Reuse sched_dynamic_update() and related logic to enable choosing
> >> >> >> the preemption model at boot or runtime for PREEMPT_AUTO.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The interface is identical to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Colour me confused, why?!? What are you doing and why aren't just just
> >> >> > adding AUTO to the existing DYNAMIC thing?
> >> >>
> >> >> You mean have a single __sched_dynamic_update()? AUTO doesn't use any
> >> >> of the static_call/static_key stuff so I'm not sure how that would work.
> >> >
> >> > *sigh*... see the below, seems to work.
> >>
> >> Sorry, didn't mean for you to have to do all that work to prove the
> >> point.
> >
> > Well, for a large part it was needed for me to figure out what your
> > patches were actually doing anyway. Peel away all the layers and this is
> > what remains.
> >
> >> I phrased it badly. I do understand how lazy can be folded in as
> >> you do here:
> >>
> >> > +	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> >> > +		if (!klp_override)
> >> > +			preempt_dynamic_disable(cond_resched);
> >> > +		preempt_dynamic_disable(might_resched);
> >> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> >> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> >> > +		preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> >> > +		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
> >> > +		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> >> > +			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
> >> > +		break;
> >> >  	}
> >>
> >> But, if the long term goal (at least as I understand it) is to get rid
> >> of cond_resched() -- to allow optimizations that needing to call cond_resched()
> >> makes impossible -- does it make sense to pull all of these together?
> >
> > It certainly doesn't make sense to add yet another configurable thing. We
> > have one, so yes add it here.
> >
> >> Say, eventually preempt_dynamic_lazy and preempt_dynamic_full are the
> >> only two models left. Then we will have (modulo figuring out how to
> >> switch over klp from cond_resched() to a different unwinding technique):
> >>
> >> static void __sched_dynamic_update(int mode)
> >> {
> >>         preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule);
> >>         preempt_dynamic_enable(preempt_schedule_notrace);
> >>         preempt_dynamic_enable(irqentry_exit_cond_resched);
> >>
> >>         switch (mode) {
> >>         case preempt_dynamic_full:
> >>                 preempt_dynamic_key_disable(preempt_lazy);
> >>                 if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> >>                         pr_info("%s: full\n", PREEMPT_MODE);
> >>                 break;
> >>
> >> 	case preempt_dynamic_lazy:
> >> 		preempt_dynamic_key_enable(preempt_lazy);
> >> 		if (mode != preempt_dynamic_mode)
> >> 			pr_info("Dynamic Preempt: lazy\n");
> >> 		break;
> >>         }
> >>
> >>         preempt_dynamic_mode = mode;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Which is pretty similar to what the PREEMPT_AUTO code was doing.
> >
> > Right, but without duplicating all that stuff in the interim.
> 
> Yeah, that makes sense. Joel had suggested something on these lines
> earlier [1], to which I was resistant.
> 
> However, the duplication (and the fact that the voluntary model
> was quite thin) should have told me that (AUTO, preempt=voluntary)
> should just be folded under PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
> 
> I'll rework the series to do that.
> 
> That should also simplify RCU related choices which I think Paul will
> like. Given that the lazy model is meant to eventually replace
> none/voluntary, so PREEMPT_RCU configuration can just be:
> 
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config TREE_RCU
> 
>  config PREEMPT_RCU
>         bool
> -       default y if PREEMPTION
> +       default y if PREEMPTION && !PREEMPT_LAZY

Given that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC selects PREEMPT_BUILD which in turn selects
PREEMPTION, this should work.

> Or, maybe we should instead have this:
> 
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ config TREE_RCU
> 
>  config PREEMPT_RCU
>         bool
> -       default y if PREEMPTION
> +       default y if PREEMPT || PREEMPT_RT
>         select TREE_RCU
> 
> Though this would be a change in behaviour for current PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> users.

Which I believe to be a no-go.  I believe that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC users
really need their preemptible kernels to include preemptible RCU.

If PREEMPT_LAZY causes PREEMPT_DYNAMIC non-preemptible kernels to become
lazily preemptible, that is a topic to discuss with PREEMPT_DYNAMIC users.
On the other hand, if PREEMPT_LAZY does not cause PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
kernels to become lazily preemptible, then I would expect there to be
hard questions about removing cond_resched() and might_sleep(), or,
for that matter changing their semantics.  Which I again must leave
to PREEMPT_DYNAMIC users.

							Thanx, Paul

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fd48ea5c-bc74-4914-a621-d12c9741c014@joelfernandes.org/
> 
> Thanks
> --
> ankur