[PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER

Dmitry Baryshkov posted 12 patches 1 year, 8 months ago
[PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 1 year, 8 months ago
Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
calibration data file.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
 #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
+#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
 #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
 #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
 
@@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
 		return ret;
 
+	fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
+	if (!fw_name)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
 				 fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
+	kfree(fw_name);
 	if (!rproc) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
 		return -ENOMEM;

-- 
2.39.2
Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER
Posted by Jeff Johnson 1 year, 8 months ago
On 5/21/2024 2:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
> calibration data file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
>  
> @@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
> +	if (!fw_name)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
>  				 fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
> +	kfree(fw_name);
>  	if (!rproc) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> 

can you cleanly bisect to this patch? seems it depends upon patch 10.
should 09 & 10 be swapped, or perhaps squashed?
Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 1 year, 8 months ago
On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 22:22, Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/21/2024 2:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
> > calibration data file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> >  #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
> > +#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
> >  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
> >  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
> >
> > @@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> >               return ret;
> >
> > +     fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
> > +     if (!fw_name)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >       rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
> >                                fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
> > +     kfree(fw_name);
> >       if (!rproc) {
> >               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
>
> can you cleanly bisect to this patch? seems it depends upon patch 10.
> should 09 & 10 be swapped, or perhaps squashed?

Yes. I think I got this mixed during rebasing and squashing of the
changes. For v2, if the approach is found to be generally acceptable,
I'll squash them.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry