arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100
which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the
priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the
NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
index 09eb1456aed4..59016518f44d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static struct shash_alg crc_t10dif_alg[] = {{
.base.cra_name = "crct10dif",
.base.cra_driver_name = "crct10dif-arm64-neon",
- .base.cra_priority = 100,
+ .base.cra_priority = 150,
.base.cra_blocksize = CRC_T10DIF_BLOCK_SIZE,
.base.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
}, {
---
base-commit: a38297e3fb012ddfa7ce0321a7e5a8daeb1872b6
change-id: 20240521-arm64-crct10dif-neon-prio-894a9350ec1e
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100
> which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the
> priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the
> NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
> index 09eb1456aed4..59016518f44d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static struct shash_alg crc_t10dif_alg[] = {{
>
> .base.cra_name = "crct10dif",
> .base.cra_driver_name = "crct10dif-arm64-neon",
> - .base.cra_priority = 100,
> + .base.cra_priority = 150,
> .base.cra_blocksize = CRC_T10DIF_BLOCK_SIZE,
> .base.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
> }, {
>
> ---
> base-commit: a38297e3fb012ddfa7ce0321a7e5a8daeb1872b6
> change-id: 20240521-arm64-crct10dif-neon-prio-894a9350ec1e
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Patch applied. Thanks.
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100 > which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the > priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the > NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation. That second NEON should be PMULL, sorry.
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:17:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100 > > which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the > > priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the > > NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation. > > That second NEON should be PMULL, sorry. Sorry, I don't grok that now: | half way between the PMULL based implementation and the PMULL one doesn't mean anything? Will
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:17:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100 > > > which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the > > > priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the > > > NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation. > > That second NEON should be PMULL, sorry. > Sorry, I don't grok that now: > | half way between the PMULL based implementation and the PMULL one > doesn't mean anything? Yes, one of those PMULLs should say generic (I thought I'd sent a followup saying that, sorry).
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 22:23, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100
> which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the
> priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the
> NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
> index 09eb1456aed4..59016518f44d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/crct10dif-ce-glue.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static struct shash_alg crc_t10dif_alg[] = {{
>
> .base.cra_name = "crct10dif",
> .base.cra_driver_name = "crct10dif-arm64-neon",
> - .base.cra_priority = 100,
> + .base.cra_priority = 150,
> .base.cra_blocksize = CRC_T10DIF_BLOCK_SIZE,
> .base.cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
> }, {
>
> ---
> base-commit: a38297e3fb012ddfa7ce0321a7e5a8daeb1872b6
> change-id: 20240521-arm64-crct10dif-neon-prio-894a9350ec1e
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.