Makefile | 4 +- drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h | 3 + drivers/dma/idxd/init.c | 4 ++ drivers/dma/idxd/registers.h | 3 - drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c | 27 ++++++++- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c | 4 ++ drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 2 + include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 + security/keys/key.c | 3 +- 10 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 6.9.1-rc1
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
wifi: mt76: mt7915: add missing chanctx ops
Silvio Gissi <sifonsec@amazon.com>
keys: Fix overwrite of key expiration on instantiation
Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: add a write() method for applications to submit work
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
dmaengine: idxd: add a new security check to deal with a hardware erratum
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
VFIO: Add the SPR_DSA and SPR_IAX devices to the denylist
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 +-
drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h | 3 +
drivers/dma/idxd/init.c | 4 ++
drivers/dma/idxd/registers.h | 3 -
drivers/dma/idxd/sysfs.c | 27 ++++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/main.c | 4 ++
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 2 +
include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 +
security/keys/key.c | 3 +-
10 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:26:37 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.9:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.9.1-rc1-g17f066a7f99c
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > Successfully compiled and installed the kernel on my computer (Acer Aspire E15, Intel Core i3 Haswell). No noticeable regressions. Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 10:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 6.9.1-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-6.9.y * git commit: 17f066a7f99c86ac634c661e8e013b124c4726b0 * git describe: v6.9-6-g17f066a7f99c * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.9.y/build/v6.9-6-g17f066a7f99c ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.9) ## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.9) ## Test Fixes (compared to v6.9) ## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.9) ## Test result summary total: 180327, pass: 155672, fail: 2287, skip: 22368, xfail: 0 ## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 127 total, 127 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 37 total, 37 passed, 0 failed * i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed * mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed * s390: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed * sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-watchdog * kselftest-x86 * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-smoketest * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * perf * rcutorture -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
On 5/15/24 02:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> thanks, -- Shuah
On 5/15/24 01:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> -- Florian
On 5/15/24 1:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.9.1 release. > There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 May 2024 08:23:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.9.1-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.9.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched). Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.