[PATCH v2 3/3] spi: spi-microchip-core: Add support for GPIO based CS

Prajna Rajendra Kumar posted 3 patches 1 year, 7 months ago
[PATCH v2 3/3] spi: spi-microchip-core: Add support for GPIO based CS
Posted by Prajna Rajendra Kumar 1 year, 7 months ago
The SPI "hard" controller within the PolarFire SoC is capable of
handling eight CS lines, but only one CS line is wired. Therefore, use
GPIO descriptors to configure additional CS lines.

Signed-off-by: Prajna Rajendra Kumar <prajna.rajendrakumar@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
index c10de45aa472..6246254e1dff 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
@@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static int mchp_corespi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 	struct mchp_corespi *corespi = spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller);
 	u32 reg;
 
+	if (spi_is_csgpiod(spi))
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * Active high targets need to be specifically set to their inactive
 	 * states during probe by adding them to the "control group" & thus
@@ -516,6 +519,7 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	host->num_chipselect = num_cs;
 	host->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
+	host->use_gpio_descriptors = true;
 	host->setup = mchp_corespi_setup;
 	host->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_MASK(8);
 	host->transfer_one = mchp_corespi_transfer_one;
-- 
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: spi-microchip-core: Add support for GPIO based CS
Posted by Conor Dooley 1 year, 7 months ago
Prajna, Mark,

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:45:08AM +0100, Prajna Rajendra Kumar wrote:
> The SPI "hard" controller within the PolarFire SoC is capable of
> handling eight CS lines, but only one CS line is wired. Therefore, use
> GPIO descriptors to configure additional CS lines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prajna Rajendra Kumar <prajna.rajendrakumar@microchip.com>

I provided an ack on v1, so here it is again:
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

In general you can keep tags between versions, if you intentionally drop
tags you should mention why you dropped them.

> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
> index c10de45aa472..6246254e1dff 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static int mchp_corespi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	struct mchp_corespi *corespi = spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller);
>  	u32 reg;
>  
> +	if (spi_is_csgpiod(spi))
> +		return 0;

Mark,

This has no users outside of core code, but is < 6 months old. Is using
it in a driver like this okay?

Cheers,
Conor.

> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Active high targets need to be specifically set to their inactive
>  	 * states during probe by adding them to the "control group" & thus
> @@ -516,6 +519,7 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	host->num_chipselect = num_cs;
>  	host->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +	host->use_gpio_descriptors = true;
>  	host->setup = mchp_corespi_setup;
>  	host->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_MASK(8);
>  	host->transfer_one = mchp_corespi_transfer_one;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv