From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
build warning. In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
static inline functions to replace such macros. This patch verifies
compliance with the new rule.
For a macro such as the one below,
#define test(a) do { } while (0)
The test result is as follows.
WARNING: Argument 'a' is not used in function-like macro
#21: FILE: mm/init-mm.c:20:
+#define test(a) do { } while (0)
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked
Signed-off-by: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Cc: Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
index 127968995847..a9fac978a525 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
@@ -906,6 +906,20 @@ Macros, Attributes and Symbols
See: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1399671106.2912.21.camel@joe-AO725/
+ **MACRO_ARG_UNUSED**
+ If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result
+ in a build warning. We advocate for utilizing static inline functions
+ to replace such macros.
+ For example, for a macro such as the one below::
+
+ #define test(a) do { } while (0)
+
+ there would be a warning like below::
+
+ WARNING: Argument 'a' is not used in function-like macro.
+
+ See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#macros-enums-and-rtl
+
**SINGLE_STATEMENT_DO_WHILE_MACRO**
For the multi-statement macros, it is necessary to use the do-while
loop to avoid unpredictable code paths. The do-while loop helps to
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 9c4c4a61bc83..9895d7e38a9f 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6040,6 +6040,12 @@ sub process {
CHK("MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE",
"Macro argument '$arg' may be better as '($arg)' to avoid precedence issues\n" . "$herectx");
}
+
+# check if this is an unused argument
+ if ($define_stmt !~ /\b$arg\b/) {
+ WARN("MACRO_ARG_UNUSED",
+ "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
+ }
}
# check for macros with flow control, but without ## concatenation
--
2.34.1
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 13:46 +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
>
> If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
> build warning. In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
> static inline functions to replace such macros. This patch verifies
> compliance with the new rule.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -6040,6 +6040,12 @@ sub process {
> CHK("MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE",
> "Macro argument '$arg' may be better as '($arg)' to avoid precedence issues\n" . "$herectx");
> }
> +
> +# check if this is an unused argument
> + if ($define_stmt !~ /\b$arg\b/) {
> + WARN("MACRO_ARG_UNUSED",
> + "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
trivia: This should be aligned to the open parenthesis.
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>> From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
>>
>> If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
>> build warning. In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
>> static inline functions to replace such macros. This patch verifies
>> compliance with the new rule.
> []
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
>> @@ -6040,6 +6040,12 @@ sub process {
>> CHK("MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE",
>> "Macro argument '$arg' may be better as '($arg)' to avoid precedence issues\n" . "$herectx");
>> }
>> +
>> +# check if this is an unused argument
>> + if ($define_stmt !~ /\b$arg\b/) {
>> + WARN("MACRO_ARG_UNUSED",
>> + "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
>
> trivia: This should be aligned to the open parenthesis.
>
Hi Joe,
I assume you mean the below?
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 9895d7e38a9f..2b812210b412 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6044,7 +6044,7 @@ sub process {
# check if this is an unused argument
if ($define_stmt !~ /\b$arg\b/) {
WARN("MACRO_ARG_UNUSED",
- "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
+ "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
}
}
> Otherwise:
> Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Thanks!
-Barry
On Mon, 2024-05-06 at 19:16 +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> > > From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
> > >
> > > If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
> > > build warning. In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
> > > static inline functions to replace such macros. This patch verifies
> > > compliance with the new rule.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > []
> > > @@ -6040,6 +6040,12 @@ sub process {
> > > CHK("MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE",
> > > "Macro argument '$arg' may be better as '($arg)' to avoid precedence issues\n" . "$herectx");
> > > }
> > > +
> > > +# check if this is an unused argument
> > > + if ($define_stmt !~ /\b$arg\b/) {
> > > + WARN("MACRO_ARG_UNUSED",
> > > + "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
> >
> > trivia: This should be aligned to the open parenthesis.
> >
>
> Hi Joe,
> I assume you mean the below?
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 9895d7e38a9f..2b812210b412 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -6044,7 +6044,7 @@ sub process {
> # check if this is an unused argument
> if ($define_stmt !~ /\b$arg\b/) {
> WARN("MACRO_ARG_UNUSED",
> - "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
> + "Argument '$arg' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
> }
> }
> > Otherwise:
> > Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Yes, but please send a v7 instead of a separate patch
to akpm or perhaps Andrew could combine them or fix it
when applying v6
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.