v1->v2:
-rebase on up-to-date tree.
-add test result in "mm: correct calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup
domain"
-drop "mm: remove redundant check in wb_min_max_ratio"
-collect RVB from Matthew to "mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty"

This series contains some random cleanups and a fix to correct
calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup domain. More details can
be found respective patches. Thanks!

Kemeng Shi (4):
  mm: enable __wb_calc_thresh to calculate dirty background threshold
  mm: correct calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup domain
  mm: call __wb_calc_thresh instead of wb_calc_thresh in
    wb_over_bg_thresh
  mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty

 mm/page-writeback.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.0

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:17:20PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> v1->v2:
> -rebase on up-to-date tree.
> -add test result in "mm: correct calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup
> domain"
> -drop "mm: remove redundant check in wb_min_max_ratio"
> -collect RVB from Matthew to "mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty"
> 
> This series contains some random cleanups and a fix to correct
> calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup domain. More details can
> be found respective patches. Thanks!

Isn't this series already in -mm? Why is this being reposted? What tree is
this based on? Please provide more context to help reviewing the patches.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Hi Tejun,

on 5/2/2024 12:16 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:17:20PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> v1->v2:
>> -rebase on up-to-date tree.
>> -add test result in "mm: correct calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup
>> domain"
>> -drop "mm: remove redundant check in wb_min_max_ratio"
>> -collect RVB from Matthew to "mm: remove stale comment __folio_mark_dirty"
>>
>> This series contains some random cleanups and a fix to correct
>> calculation of wb's bg_thresh in cgroup domain. More details can
>> be found respective patches. Thanks!
> 
> Isn't this series already in -mm? Why is this being reposted? What tree is
> this based on? Please provide more context to help reviewing the patches.
> 
Sorry for late reply as I was on vacation these days. This series is based
on mm-unstable and was applied into -mm mm-unstable branch after this v2
series was posted.
Thanks
> Thanks.
>