From: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>

I think the 'lag' calculation here is inaccurate.

Assume that delta needs to be subtracted from v_i to ensure that the
vlag of task i after placement is the same as before. At this time, the
vlag of task i after placement should be:
vl'_i = V' - (v_i - delta)

From the above formula, we know that vl'_i should be:
vl'_i = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)

That is to say:
V' - (v_i - delta) = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)

For a newly added entity, generally set v_i to V', and the above formula
can be converted into:
V' - (V' - delta) = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)

Therefore the value of delta should be as follows, where delta is the
'lag' in the code.
delta = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)

Signed-off-by: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 03be0d1330a6..c5f74f753be8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5239,9 +5239,12 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 		if (curr && curr->on_rq)
 			load += scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);
 
-		lag *= load + scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
+		lag *= load;
+
+		load += scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!load))
 			load = 1;
+
 		lag = div_s64(lag, load);
 	}
 
-- 
2.17.1

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:44:16PM +0800, hupu@oppo.com wrote:
> From: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
> 
> I think the 'lag' calculation here is inaccurate.
> 
> Assume that delta needs to be subtracted from v_i to ensure that the
> vlag of task i after placement is the same as before.

Why ?!? v_i is the unkown, it makes no sense to complicate things by
adding extra unknowns.

> At this time, the
> vlag of task i after placement should be:
> vl'_i = V' - (v_i - delta)

But but but, you can't have V' without knowing v_i.

> From the above formula, we know that vl'_i should be:
> vl'_i = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
> 
> That is to say:
> V' - (v_i - delta) = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
> 
> For a newly added entity, generally set v_i to V', and the above formula
> can be converted into:
> V' - (V' - delta) = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
> 
> Therefore the value of delta should be as follows, where delta is the
> 'lag' in the code.
> delta = (vl_i * W)/(W + w_i)
> 
> Signed-off-by: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 03be0d1330a6..c5f74f753be8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5239,9 +5239,12 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  		if (curr && curr->on_rq)
>  			load += scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);
>  
> -		lag *= load + scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
> +		lag *= load;
> +
> +		load += scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
>  		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!load))
>  			load = 1;
> +
>  		lag = div_s64(lag, load);

You're making it:

	v_i = V - (W * vl_i) / (W + w_i)

In direct contradiction to the giant comment right above this that
explains why the code is as it is.

>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 07:44:59PM +0800, hupu@oppo.com wrote:
> > > From: hupu <hupu@oppo.com>
> > >
> > > I think the 'lag' calculation here is inaccurate.
> > >
> > > Assume that delta needs to be subtracted from v_i to ensure that the
> > > vlag of task i after placement is the same as before.
> >
> > Why ?!? v_i is the unkown, it makes no sense to complicate things by
> > adding extra unknowns.
> >
> > > At this time, the
> > > vlag of task i after placement should be:
> > > vl'_i = V' - (v_i - delta)
> >
> > But but but, you can't have V' without knowing v_i.
> >
> 
> Thank you for your patient guidance. I overlooked a important fact that
> v_i is unknown in the process of proof. Below is the complete proof
> process, and it turns out that you are correct.

*phew*, thanks for checking!