Let's get rid of another page_mapcount() check and simply use
folio_likely_mapped_shared(), which is precise for hugetlb folios.
While at it, also check for PMD table sharing, like we do in
smaps_hugetlb_range().
No functional change intended, except that we would now detect hugetlb
folios shared via PMD table sharing correctly.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 8ff79bd427ec6..cd6e45e0cde8e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -1578,12 +1578,13 @@ static int pagemap_hugetlb_range(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
if (pte_present(pte)) {
- struct page *page = pte_page(pte);
+ struct folio *folio = page_folio(pte_page(pte));
- if (!PageAnon(page))
+ if (!folio_test_anon(folio))
flags |= PM_FILE;
- if (page_mapcount(page) == 1)
+ if (!folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio) &&
+ !hugetlb_pmd_shared(ptep))
flags |= PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
if (huge_pte_uffd_wp(pte))
--
2.44.0