kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Currently cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all() will be called when releasing
cgroup even if the cgroup is on default hierarchy, however it doesn't
make any sense for v2 to destroy pidlist of v1.
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
index 520a11cb12f4..46d89157d558 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c
@@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all(struct cgroup *cgrp)
{
struct cgroup_pidlist *l, *tmp_l;
+ if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp))
+ return;
mutex_lock(&cgrp->pidlist_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(l, tmp_l, &cgrp->pidlists, links)
mod_delayed_work(cgroup_pidlist_destroy_wq, &l->destroy_dwork, 0);
--
2.34.1
Hello, On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:13:59AM +0000, Xiu Jianfeng wrote: > From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> > > Currently cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all() will be called when releasing > cgroup even if the cgroup is on default hierarchy, however it doesn't > make any sense for v2 to destroy pidlist of v1. > > Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> > --- > kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c > index 520a11cb12f4..46d89157d558 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c > @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all(struct cgroup *cgrp) > { > struct cgroup_pidlist *l, *tmp_l; > > + if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp)) > + return; Can you move the test to the caller? Thanks. -- tejun
Hi, On 2024/4/18 10:02, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 02:13:59AM +0000, Xiu Jianfeng wrote: >> From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> >> >> Currently cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all() will be called when releasing >> cgroup even if the cgroup is on default hierarchy, however it doesn't >> make any sense for v2 to destroy pidlist of v1. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> >> --- >> kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c >> index 520a11cb12f4..46d89157d558 100644 >> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c >> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c >> @@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void cgroup1_pidlist_destroy_all(struct cgroup *cgrp) >> { >> struct cgroup_pidlist *l, *tmp_l; >> >> + if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp)) >> + return; > > Can you move the test to the caller? Sure, will do in v2. > > Thanks. >
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.