Hello all,

sorry for spamming, this one have the correct email addresses.
This patch adds a property for to control reset behavior on
PMIC_RST_B assertion.

---
v1 ---> v2:
	- Fix email addresses

Fabio Aiuto (1):
  regulator: pca9450: make warm reset on PMIC_RST_B assertion

 .../bindings/regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml     |  6 ++++++
 drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c                 | 11 ++++++++---
 include/linux/regulator/pca9450.h                     |  6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:01:37PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> sorry for spamming, this one have the correct email addresses.
> This patch adds a property for to control reset behavior on
> PMIC_RST_B assertion.

Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that 
any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
lost. 

Dear Mark,

Il Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 01:37:48PM +0100, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 12:01:37PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > sorry for spamming, this one have the correct email addresses.
> > This patch adds a property for to control reset behavior on
> > PMIC_RST_B assertion.
> 
> Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
> that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
> if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that 
> any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
> lost. 

I've got it, thanks. Do you want me to send a v3 or are you taking in
consideration this one?

kr

fabio

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 03:22:22PM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote:

> I've got it, thanks. Do you want me to send a v3 or are you taking in
> consideration this one?

No, it's fine this time - just a note for next time.