Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> Posix CPU timers are not updating k_itimer::it_active which makes it
> impossible to base decisions in the common posix timer code on it.
>
> Update it when queueing or dequeueing posix CPU timers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> V2: Move the clearing to cpu_timer_fire() - Frederic
> ---
> kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> @@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ static void disarm_timer(struct k_itimer
> struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
> struct posix_cputimer_base *base;
>
> + timer->it_active = 0;
> if (!cpu_timer_dequeue(ctmr))
> return;
>
> @@ -559,6 +560,7 @@ static void arm_timer(struct k_itimer *t
> struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
> u64 newexp = cpu_timer_getexpires(ctmr);
>
> + timer->it_active = 1;
> if (!cpu_timer_enqueue(&base->tqhead, ctmr))
> return;
>
> @@ -584,6 +586,7 @@ static void cpu_timer_fire(struct k_itim
> {
> struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
>
> + timer->it_active = 0;
> if (unlikely(timer->sigq == NULL)) {
> /*
> * This a special case for clock_nanosleep,
> @@ -668,6 +671,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_
> ret = TIMER_RETRY;
> } else {
> cpu_timer_dequeue(ctmr);
> + timer->it_active = 0;
NIT: you could change the order of the above two commands, then it is in
the same order as the others.
with or without changing the NIT:
Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>