MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's
supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is
equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync().
Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 243d71f7bc1f..95fbc8c05607 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* When not uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
* (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages;
* When uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
- * (MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES - 1) pages.
+ * MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages.
*/
if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
(end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
- pages >= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
+ pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
flush_tlb_mm(vma->vm_mm);
return;
}
--
2.44.0
On 4/5/24 09:28, Gavin Shan wrote:
> MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's
> supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is
> equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync().
>
> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 243d71f7bc1f..95fbc8c05607 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * When not uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> * (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages;
> * When uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> - * (MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES - 1) pages.
> + * MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages.
> */
> if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
> (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
> - pages >= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> + pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> flush_tlb_mm(vma->vm_mm);
> return;
> }
On 05/04/2024 04:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's
> supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is
> equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync().
>
> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 243d71f7bc1f..95fbc8c05607 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * When not uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> * (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages;
> * When uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> - * (MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES - 1) pages.
> + * MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages.
> */
> if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
> (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
> - pages >= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> + pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
As a further enhancement, I wonder if it might be better to test:
pages * 4 / MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES > MAX_DVM_OPS
Then add an extra loop over __flush_tlb_range_op(), like KVM does.
The math is trying to express that there are a maximum of 4 tlbi range
instructions for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages (1 per scale) and we only need to
fall back to flushing the whole mm if it could generate more than MAX_DVM_OPS ops.
> flush_tlb_mm(vma->vm_mm);
> return;
> }
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:43:44 +0100,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 05/04/2024 04:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's
> > supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is
> > equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync().
> >
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > index 243d71f7bc1f..95fbc8c05607 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > * When not uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> > * (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages;
> > * When uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> > - * (MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES - 1) pages.
> > + * MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages.
> > */
> > if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
> > (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
> > - pages >= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> > + pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
>
> As a further enhancement, I wonder if it might be better to test:
>
> pages * 4 / MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES > MAX_DVM_OPS
>
> Then add an extra loop over __flush_tlb_range_op(), like KVM does.
>
> The math is trying to express that there are a maximum of 4 tlbi range
> instructions for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages (1 per scale) and we only need to
> fall back to flushing the whole mm if it could generate more than MAX_DVM_OPS ops.
That'd be a good enhancement indeed, although I wonder if that occurs
as often as we see it on the KVM side. But in any case, adding
consistency amongst the users of __flush_tlb_range_op() can only be
beneficial.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:50:20AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 09:43:44 +0100,
> Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/04/2024 04:58, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's
> > > supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is
> > > equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync().
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> >
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > > index 243d71f7bc1f..95fbc8c05607 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > > @@ -446,11 +446,11 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > * When not uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> > > * (MAX_DVM_OPS - 1) pages;
> > > * When uses TLB range ops, we can handle up to
> > > - * (MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES - 1) pages.
> > > + * MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages.
> > > */
> > > if ((!system_supports_tlb_range() &&
> > > (end - start) >= (MAX_DVM_OPS * stride)) ||
> > > - pages >= MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> > > + pages > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES) {
> >
> > As a further enhancement, I wonder if it might be better to test:
> >
> > pages * 4 / MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES > MAX_DVM_OPS
> >
> > Then add an extra loop over __flush_tlb_range_op(), like KVM does.
> >
> > The math is trying to express that there are a maximum of 4 tlbi range
> > instructions for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages (1 per scale) and we only need to
> > fall back to flushing the whole mm if it could generate more than MAX_DVM_OPS ops.
>
> That'd be a good enhancement indeed, although I wonder if that occurs
> as often as we see it on the KVM side. But in any case, adding
> consistency amongst the users of __flush_tlb_range_op() can only be
> beneficial.
I'll pick patches 2 & 3 up for 6.10, but feel free to send stuff on top
if you want to tweak this.
Will
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 01:58:52PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: > MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES pages is covered by SCALE#3 and NUM#31 and it's > supported now. Allow TLBI RANGE operation when the number of pages is > equal to MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES in __flush_tlb_range_nosync(). > > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Verified this case as well, so: Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.