blacklist is built solely for x86, move it to the respective folder.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 -
drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile | 2 ++
drivers/acpi/{ => x86}/blacklist.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename drivers/acpi/{ => x86}/blacklist.c (99%)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
index 413c18e2bf61..6f4187a34f41 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ tables.o: $(src)/../../include/$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE) ;
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += tables.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += blacklist.o
#
# ACPI Core Subsystem (Interpreter)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile
index b97b1bcf8404..1f3c5fa84f9e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile
@@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ acpi-x86-y += apple.o
acpi-x86-y += cmos_rtc.o
acpi-x86-y += s2idle.o
acpi-x86-y += utils.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += blacklist.o
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/blacklist.c
similarity index 99%
rename from drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
rename to drivers/acpi/x86/blacklist.c
index a558d24fb788..55214d0a12b1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/blacklist.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/dmi.h>
-#include "internal.h"
+#include "../internal.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_DMI
static const struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initconst;
--
2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096
On 4/4/24 11:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> blacklist is built solely for x86, move it to the respective folder.
Don't you need #ifdef CONFIG_X86 for acpi_blacklisted() in
include/linux/acpi.h
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile | 2 ++
> drivers/acpi/{ => x86}/blacklist.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/acpi/{ => x86}/blacklist.c (99%)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> index 413c18e2bf61..6f4187a34f41 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ tables.o: $(src)/../../include/$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE) ;
> endif
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += tables.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += blacklist.o
>
> #
> # ACPI Core Subsystem (Interpreter)
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile
> index b97b1bcf8404..1f3c5fa84f9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/Makefile
> @@ -3,3 +3,5 @@ acpi-x86-y += apple.o
> acpi-x86-y += cmos_rtc.o
> acpi-x86-y += s2idle.o
> acpi-x86-y += utils.o
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += blacklist.o
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/blacklist.c
> similarity index 99%
> rename from drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
> rename to drivers/acpi/x86/blacklist.c
> index a558d24fb788..55214d0a12b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/blacklist.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
>
> -#include "internal.h"
> +#include "../internal.h"
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMI
> static const struct dmi_system_id acpi_rev_dmi_table[] __initconst;
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:44:15AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: > > On 4/4/24 11:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > blacklist is built solely for x86, move it to the respective folder. > > Don't you need #ifdef CONFIG_X86 for acpi_blacklisted() in > include/linux/acpi.h It's unrelated to this series. It was like that before and this series doesn't change this aspect. AFAICS the API is called from x86 only, that's why it's not a problem, but strictly speaking you are right. Feel free to submit a patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On 4/5/24 8:19 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 07:44:15AM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote: >> On 4/4/24 11:23 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> blacklist is built solely for x86, move it to the respective folder. >> Don't you need #ifdef CONFIG_X86 for acpi_blacklisted() in >> include/linux/acpi.h > It's unrelated to this series. > It was like that before and this series doesn't change this aspect. > > AFAICS the API is called from x86 only, that's why it's not a problem, > but strictly speaking you are right. Feel free to submit a patch. > Agree. -- Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy Linux Kernel Developer
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.