[PATCH 3/4] x86/boot: Explicitly pass NX enabling status

Dave Hansen posted 4 patches 1 year, 10 months ago
[PATCH 3/4] x86/boot: Explicitly pass NX enabling status
Posted by Dave Hansen 1 year, 10 months ago

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

The kernel sometimes needs to mask unsupported bits out of page
table entries.  It does that with a mask: '__supported_pte_mask'.

That mask can obviously only contain the No-eXecute bit (_PAGE_NX)
on hardware where NX is supported.  x86_configure_nx() checks the
boot CPU's NX support and adjusts the mask appropriately.

But it doesn't check support directly.  It uses the venerable
'boot_cpu_data' which is a software approximation of the actual CPU
support.  Unfortunately, Xen wants to set up '__supported_pte_mask'
before 'boot_cpu_data' has been initialized.  It hacks around this
problem by repeating some of the 'boot_cpu_data' setup *just* for
NX.

Have x86_configure_nx() stop consulting 'boot_cpu_data' and move
the NX detection to the caller.

No functional change.  That will come later.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
---

 b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h |    2 +-
 b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c      |    6 +++---
 b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c  |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h~x86_configure_nx-arg arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h~x86_configure_nx-arg	2024-04-02 15:22:59.638913056 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h	2024-04-02 15:22:59.642913062 -0700
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ void entry_SYSRETL_compat_end(void);
 #define entry_SYSENTER_compat NULL
 #endif
 
-void x86_configure_nx(void);
+void x86_configure_nx(bool nx_supported);
 
 extern int reboot_force;
 
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/setup.c~x86_configure_nx-arg arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c~x86_configure_nx-arg	2024-04-02 15:22:59.638913056 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c	2024-04-02 15:22:59.642913062 -0700
@@ -687,9 +687,9 @@ dump_kernel_offset(struct notifier_block
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void x86_configure_nx(void)
+void x86_configure_nx(bool nx_supported)
 {
-	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX))
+	if (nx_supported)
 		__supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_NX;
 	else
 		__supported_pte_mask &= ~_PAGE_NX;
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 * whether hardware doesn't support NX (so that the early EHCI debug
 	 * console setup can safely call set_fixmap()).
 	 */
-	x86_configure_nx();
+	x86_configure_nx(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX));
 
 	parse_early_param();
 
diff -puN arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c~x86_configure_nx-arg arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c~x86_configure_nx-arg	2024-04-02 15:22:59.638913056 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c	2024-04-02 15:22:59.642913062 -0700
@@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init xen_sta
 
 	/* Work out if we support NX */
 	get_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data);
-	x86_configure_nx();
+	x86_configure_nx(boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NX));
 
 	/*
 	 * Set up kernel GDT and segment registers, mainly so that
_
Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86/boot: Explicitly pass NX enabling status
Posted by Jürgen Groß 1 year, 10 months ago
On 03.04.24 17:35, Dave Hansen wrote:
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The kernel sometimes needs to mask unsupported bits out of page
> table entries.  It does that with a mask: '__supported_pte_mask'.
> 
> That mask can obviously only contain the No-eXecute bit (_PAGE_NX)
> on hardware where NX is supported.  x86_configure_nx() checks the
> boot CPU's NX support and adjusts the mask appropriately.
> 
> But it doesn't check support directly.  It uses the venerable
> 'boot_cpu_data' which is a software approximation of the actual CPU
> support.  Unfortunately, Xen wants to set up '__supported_pte_mask'
> before 'boot_cpu_data' has been initialized.  It hacks around this
> problem by repeating some of the 'boot_cpu_data' setup *just* for
> NX.
> 
> Have x86_configure_nx() stop consulting 'boot_cpu_data' and move
> the NX detection to the caller.
> 
> No functional change.  That will come later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Juergen