[PATCH 1/4] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: fix LDO supply rails and off-by-ones

Andre Przywara posted 4 patches 1 year, 10 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 1/4] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: fix LDO supply rails and off-by-ones
Posted by Andre Przywara 1 year, 10 months ago
The X-Powers AXP717 PMIC has separate input supply pins for each group
of LDOs, so they are not all using the same DCDC1 input, as described
currently.

Replace the "supply" member of each LDO description with the respective
group supply name, so that the supply dependencies can be correctly
described in the devicetree.
Also fix two off-by-ones in the regulator macros, after some double
checking the numbers against the datasheet.

Fixes: d2ac3df75c3a ("regulator: axp20x: add support for the AXP717")
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
index 34fcdd82b2eaa..3907606b091f6 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
 
 #define AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES	88
 #define AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES	107
-#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	104
+#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
 #define AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK		GENMASK(6, 0)
 #define AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK		GENMASK(4, 0)
 
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc1_ranges[] = {
 static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc2_ranges[] = {
 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70,  10000),
 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71,  87,  20000),
-	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 107, 100000),
+	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 106, 100000),
 };
 
 static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
@@ -790,40 +790,40 @@ static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = {
 	AXP_DESC(AXP717, DCDC4, "dcdc4", "vin4", 1000, 3700, 100,
 		 AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL, AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO1, "aldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO1, "aldo1", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_ALDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO2, "aldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO2, "aldo2", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_ALDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO3, "aldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO3, "aldo3", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_ALDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO4, "aldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO4, "aldo4", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_ALDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO1, "bldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO1, "bldo1", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_BLDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(4)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO2, "bldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO2, "bldo2", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_BLDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(5)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO3, "bldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO3, "bldo3", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_BLDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(6)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO4, "bldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO4, "bldo4", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_BLDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(7)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO1, "cldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO1, "cldo1", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_CLDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO2, "cldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO2, "cldo2", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_CLDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO3, "cldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO3, "cldo3", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_CLDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)),
-	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO4, "cldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
+	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO4, "cldo4", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
 		 AXP717_CLDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
 		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
 	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CPUSLDO, "cpusldo", "vin1", 500, 1400, 50,
-- 
2.35.8
Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: fix LDO supply rails and off-by-ones
Posted by John Watts 1 year, 10 months ago
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:50:30PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The X-Powers AXP717 PMIC has separate input supply pins for each group
> of LDOs, so they are not all using the same DCDC1 input, as described
> currently.
> 
> Replace the "supply" member of each LDO description with the respective
> group supply name, so that the supply dependencies can be correctly
> described in the devicetree.
> Also fix two off-by-ones in the regulator macros, after some double
> checking the numbers against the datasheet.
> 
> Fixes: d2ac3df75c3a ("regulator: axp20x: add support for the AXP717")
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi,

> ---
>  drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> index 34fcdd82b2eaa..3907606b091f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
>  
>  #define AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES	88
>  #define AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES	107
> -#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	104
> +#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
>  #define AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK		GENMASK(6, 0)
>  #define AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK		GENMASK(4, 0)
>  
> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc1_ranges[] = {
>  static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc2_ranges[] = {
>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70,  10000),
>  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71,  87,  20000),
> -	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 107, 100000),
> +	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 106, 100000),
>  };

I'm not entirely sure these are correct after reading the datasheet.

From what I can tell REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE is inclusive, so for DCDC1
we have these ranges (we agree DCDC1 is correct, it is not affected by
this patch):

#define AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES	88
static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc1_ranges[] = {
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0, 70, 10000),
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71, 87, 20000),
};

The datasheet says this for the register:

0.5~1.2V,10mV/step,71steps
1.22~1.54V,20mV/step,17steps
0000000: 0.50V
0000001: 0.51V
...
1000110: 1.20V
1000111: 1.22V
1001000: 1.24V
...
1010111: 1.54V
1011000~1111111: Reserve

Converting to decimal:

0: 0.50V (range 1 start)
1: 0.51V
...
70: 1.20V (range 1 end)
71: 1.22V (range 2 start)
72: 1.24V
...
87: 1.54V (range 2 end)
88 onwards: reserved

The maximum voltages are the last value plus one (to include voltage zero).

For DCDC2 after applying this patch we get:

#define AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES	107
static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc2_ranges[] = {
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70,  10000),
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71,  87,  20000),
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 106, 100000),
};

The datasheet marks the maximum value as 1101011: 3.40V, so 106 (the old
value for range) seems correct, but the NUM_VOLTAGES seems like it
should be bumped up to 108. I think you fixed the wrong thing here.

#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc2_ranges[] = {
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70,  10000),
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71,  87,  20000),
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 106, 100000),
};

The datasheet marks the maximum value as 1101011: 3.40V, so 106 (the old
value for range) seems correct, but the NUM_VOLTAGES seems like it
should be bumped up to 108. I think you fixed the wrong thing here.
For DCDC3 after applying this patch we get:

#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70, 10000),
	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71, 102, 20000),
};

The datasheet marks the maximum value as 1100110: 1.84V, which is 102.
So this patch to correct the AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES is correct here.

John.

>  
>  static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
> @@ -790,40 +790,40 @@ static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = {
>  	AXP_DESC(AXP717, DCDC4, "dcdc4", "vin4", 1000, 3700, 100,
>  		 AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL, AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO1, "aldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO1, "aldo1", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_ALDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO2, "aldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO2, "aldo2", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_ALDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO3, "aldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO3, "aldo3", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_ALDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO4, "aldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO4, "aldo4", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_ALDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO1, "bldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO1, "bldo1", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_BLDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(4)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO2, "bldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO2, "bldo2", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_BLDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(5)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO3, "bldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO3, "bldo3", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_BLDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(6)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO4, "bldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO4, "bldo4", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_BLDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(7)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO1, "cldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO1, "cldo1", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_CLDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO2, "cldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO2, "cldo2", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_CLDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO3, "cldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO3, "cldo3", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_CLDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)),
> -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO4, "cldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO4, "cldo4", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
>  		 AXP717_CLDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
>  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
>  	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CPUSLDO, "cpusldo", "vin1", 500, 1400, 50,
> -- 
> 2.35.8
>
Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: fix LDO supply rails and off-by-ones
Posted by Andre Przywara 1 year, 9 months ago
On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:00:09 +1000
John Watts <contact@jookia.org> wrote:

Hi John,

many thanks for the detailed review (also on the other two patches), much
appreciated!

> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:50:30PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > The X-Powers AXP717 PMIC has separate input supply pins for each group
> > of LDOs, so they are not all using the same DCDC1 input, as described
> > currently.
> > 
> > Replace the "supply" member of each LDO description with the respective
> > group supply name, so that the supply dependencies can be correctly
> > described in the devicetree.
> > Also fix two off-by-ones in the regulator macros, after some double
> > checking the numbers against the datasheet.
> > 
> > Fixes: d2ac3df75c3a ("regulator: axp20x: add support for the AXP717")
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > index 34fcdd82b2eaa..3907606b091f6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@
> >  
> >  #define AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES	88
> >  #define AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES	107
> > -#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	104
> > +#define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
> >  #define AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK		GENMASK(6, 0)
> >  #define AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK		GENMASK(4, 0)
> >  
> > @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc1_ranges[] = {
> >  static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc2_ranges[] = {
> >  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70,  10000),
> >  	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71,  87,  20000),
> > -	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 107, 100000),
> > +	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 106, 100000),
> >  };  
> 
> I'm not entirely sure these are correct after reading the datasheet.
> 
> From what I can tell REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE is inclusive, so for DCDC1
> we have these ranges (we agree DCDC1 is correct, it is not affected by
> this patch):
> 
> #define AXP717_DCDC1_NUM_VOLTAGES	88
> static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc1_ranges[] = {
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0, 70, 10000),
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71, 87, 20000),
> };
> 
> The datasheet says this for the register:
> 
> 0.5~1.2V,10mV/step,71steps
> 1.22~1.54V,20mV/step,17steps
> 0000000: 0.50V
> 0000001: 0.51V
> ...
> 1000110: 1.20V
> 1000111: 1.22V
> 1001000: 1.24V
> ...
> 1010111: 1.54V
> 1011000~1111111: Reserve
> 
> Converting to decimal:
> 
> 0: 0.50V (range 1 start)
> 1: 0.51V
> ...
> 70: 1.20V (range 1 end)
> 71: 1.22V (range 2 start)
> 72: 1.24V
> ...
> 87: 1.54V (range 2 end)
> 88 onwards: reserved
> 
> The maximum voltages are the last value plus one (to include voltage zero).
> 
> For DCDC2 after applying this patch we get:
> 
> #define AXP717_DCDC2_NUM_VOLTAGES	107
> static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc2_ranges[] = {
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70,  10000),
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71,  87,  20000),
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 88, 106, 100000),
> };
> 
> The datasheet marks the maximum value as 1101011: 3.40V, so 106 (the old
> value for range) seems correct, but the NUM_VOLTAGES seems like it
> should be bumped up to 108. I think you fixed the wrong thing here.

I see what you mean, though I actually looked at the number of steps
mentioned in the first part of the register description. Now
triple-checking this I came up with this table (generated by a spreadsheet
to minimise human error):
voltage	decimal	binary	
1600	88	1011000
1700	89	1011001
1800	90	1011010
1900	91	1011011
2000	92	1011100
2100	93	1011101
2200	94	1011110
2300	95	1011111
2400	96	1100000
2500	97	1100001
2600	98	1100010
2700	99	1100011
2800	100	1100100
2900	101	1100101
3000	102	1100110
3100	103	1100111
3200	104	1101000
3300	105	1101001
3400	106	1101010

Which means the final binary value in the datasheet is wrong, as 1101011
would mean 3.5V.
Also  1101010 = 106
     -1011000 = 88
=============
      0010010 = 18
and 18 * 100 + 1600 = 3400, right?

This *is* admittedly quite bonkers, especially since the representations
between the manual and the code are so different, but can you check that
this makes sense?

I discovered some other issue in the original patch (missed declaring the
range of IRQ acknowledge registers in the MFD part), so I will send a v2 of
this series soonish.

> For DCDC3 after applying this patch we get:
> 
> #define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
> static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70, 10000),
> 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71, 102, 20000),
> };
> 
> The datasheet marks the maximum value as 1100110: 1.84V, which is 102.
> So this patch to correct the AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES is correct here.

I agree ;-) thanks for checking!

Cheers,
Andre

> >  static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
> > @@ -790,40 +790,40 @@ static const struct regulator_desc axp717_regulators[] = {
> >  	AXP_DESC(AXP717, DCDC4, "dcdc4", "vin4", 1000, 3700, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_DCDC4_CONTROL, AXP717_DCDC_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_DCDC_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO1, "aldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO1, "aldo1", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_ALDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO2, "aldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO2, "aldo2", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_ALDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO3, "aldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO3, "aldo3", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_ALDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO4, "aldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, ALDO4, "aldo4", "aldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_ALDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO1, "bldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO1, "bldo1", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_BLDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(4)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO2, "bldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO2, "bldo2", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_BLDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(5)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO3, "bldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO3, "bldo3", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_BLDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(6)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO4, "bldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, BLDO4, "bldo4", "bldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_BLDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO0_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(7)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO1, "cldo1", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO1, "cldo1", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_CLDO1_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(0)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO2, "cldo2", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO2, "cldo2", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_CLDO2_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(1)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO3, "cldo3", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO3, "cldo3", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_CLDO3_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(2)),
> > -	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO4, "cldo4", "vin1", 500, 3500, 100,
> > +	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CLDO4, "cldo4", "cldoin", 500, 3500, 100,
> >  		 AXP717_CLDO4_CONTROL, AXP717_LDO_V_OUT_MASK,
> >  		 AXP717_LDO1_OUTPUT_CONTROL, BIT(3)),
> >  	AXP_DESC(AXP717, CPUSLDO, "cpusldo", "vin1", 500, 1400, 50,
> > -- 
> > 2.35.8
> >
Re: [PATCH 1/4] regulator: axp20x: AXP717: fix LDO supply rails and off-by-ones
Posted by John Watts 1 year, 9 months ago
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:23:05PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:00:09 +1000
> John Watts <contact@jookia.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> many thanks for the detailed review (also on the other two patches), much
> appreciated!

No problem!

> I see what you mean, though I actually looked at the number of steps
> mentioned in the first part of the register description. Now
> triple-checking this I came up with this table (generated by a spreadsheet
> to minimise human error):
> voltage	decimal	binary	
> 1600	88	1011000
> 1700	89	1011001
> 1800	90	1011010
> 1900	91	1011011
> 2000	92	1011100
> 2100	93	1011101
> 2200	94	1011110
> 2300	95	1011111
> 2400	96	1100000
> 2500	97	1100001
> 2600	98	1100010
> 2700	99	1100011
> 2800	100	1100100
> 2900	101	1100101
> 3000	102	1100110
> 3100	103	1100111
> 3200	104	1101000
> 3300	105	1101001
> 3400	106	1101010
> 
> Which means the final binary value in the datasheet is wrong, as 1101011
> would mean 3.5V.
> Also  1101010 = 106
>      -1011000 = 88
> =============
>       0010010 = 18
> and 18 * 100 + 1600 = 3400, right?
> 
> This *is* admittedly quite bonkers, especially since the representations
> between the manual and the code are so different, but can you check that
> this makes sense?

I wrote a program in Python that steps through each range and prints its
value, and according to it value 106 is 3.4V. I dumped it at the end of
this email for anyone curious. Your math checks out too.

So the datasheet must be wrong. Maybe it originally supported up to 3.5V
and someone who doesn't know binary updated the sheet.

I think you should add a note saying that the datasheet is wrong, to
show people this isn't a bug and also save time of others trying to
write their own drivers and check their logic. Something like this:

Warning, the datasheet specifies that 3.40V is 107, which is incorrect:
- There are only 107 steps in total, making the highest step value 106
- 1.60V is listed as 1011000 (88 in decimal), with 18 steps after that 
- Adding 100mV for each of the 18 steps past 1.60V gives 3.4V

I think this logic convinces me at least. :)

John.

> I discovered some other issue in the original patch (missed declaring the
> range of IRQ acknowledge registers in the MFD part), so I will send a v2 of
> this series soonish.
> 
> > For DCDC3 after applying this patch we get:
> > 
> > #define AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES	103
> > static const struct linear_range axp717_dcdc3_ranges[] = {
> > 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(500000,   0,  70, 10000),
> > 	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1220000, 71, 102, 20000),
> > };
> > 
> > The datasheet marks the maximum value as 1100110: 1.84V, which is 102.
> > So this patch to correct the AXP717_DCDC3_NUM_VOLTAGES is correct here.
> 
> I agree ;-) thanks for checking!
> 
> Cheers,
> Andre

---

Python program:

reg = 0
value = 500
for x in range(71):
	print("%i: %imV" % (reg, value))
	value += 10
	reg += 1
value = 1220
for x in range(17):
	print("%i: %imV" % (reg, value))
	value += 20
	reg += 1
value = 1600
for x in range(19):
	print("%i: %imV" % (reg, value))
	value += 100
	reg += 1