[PATCH v4 2/2] scripts: checkpatch: check unused parameters for function-like macro

Barry Song posted 2 patches 1 year, 10 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v4 2/2] scripts: checkpatch: check unused parameters for function-like macro
Posted by Barry Song 1 year, 10 months ago
From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>

If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
build warning.  In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
static inline functions to replace such macros.  This patch verifies
compliance with the new rule.

For a macro such as the one below,

 #define test(a) do { } while (0)

The test result is as follows.

 ERROR: Parameter 'a' is not used in function-like macro, please use static
 inline instead
 #21: FILE: mm/init-mm.c:20:
 +#define test(a) do { } while (0)

 total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked

Signed-off-by: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 9c4c4a61bc83..bcb886014d60 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6109,6 +6109,36 @@ sub process {
 				WARN("TRAILING_SEMICOLON",
 				     "macros should not use a trailing semicolon\n" . "$herectx");
 			}
+
+			# match "\s*" rather than "\s+" after the balanced parens, as macro definition with arguments
+			# is not required to have whitespace after arguments
+			if ($dstat =~ /^\+\s*#\s*define\s+$Ident$balanced_parens\s*(\S+.*)(\/[\/*].*)?/) {
+				my $params = $1 || "";
+				my $body = $2 || "";
+
+			    # get the individual params
+				$params =~ tr/()//d;
+				# remove leading and trailing whitespace
+				$params =~ s/^\s+|\s+$//g;
+
+				$ctx =~ s/\n*$//;
+				my $cnt = statement_rawlines($ctx);
+				my $herectx = get_stat_here($linenr, $cnt, $here);
+
+				if ($params ne "") {
+					my @paramList = split /,\s*/, $params;
+					foreach my $param(@paramList) {
+						if ($param =~ /\.\.\.$/) {
+							# if the param name ends with "...", skip the check
+							next;
+						}
+						if ($body !~ /\b$param\b/) {
+							WARN("UNUSED_PARAM_IN_MACRO",
+								"Parameter '$param' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
+						}
+					}
+				}
+			}
 		}
 
 # check for redundant bracing round if etc
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] scripts: checkpatch: check unused parameters for function-like macro
Posted by Jeff Johnson 1 year, 10 months ago
On 3/27/2024 7:21 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
> 
> If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
> build warning.  In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
> static inline functions to replace such macros.  This patch verifies
> compliance with the new rule.
> 
> For a macro such as the one below,
> 
>  #define test(a) do { } while (0)
> 
> The test result is as follows.
> 
>  ERROR: Parameter 'a' is not used in function-like macro, please use static
>  inline instead
>  #21: FILE: mm/init-mm.c:20:
>  +#define test(a) do { } while (0)
> 
>  total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>

if you are re-posting somebody else's work you need to add your own Signed-off-by

> Tested-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
> Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] scripts: checkpatch: check unused parameters for function-like macro
Posted by Barry Song 1 year, 10 months ago
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 5:01 AM Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/27/2024 7:21 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
> >
> > If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
> > build warning.  In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
> > static inline functions to replace such macros.  This patch verifies
> > compliance with the new rule.
> >
> > For a macro such as the one below,
> >
> >  #define test(a) do { } while (0)
> >
> > The test result is as follows.
> >
> >  ERROR: Parameter 'a' is not used in function-like macro, please use static
> >  inline instead
> >  #21: FILE: mm/init-mm.c:20:
> >  +#define test(a) do { } while (0)
> >
> >  total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 lines checked
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
>
> if you are re-posting somebody else's work you need to add your own Signed-off-by

Ok. Jeff, I will do it in the new version and obviously Joe still has
some remaining
comments to be addressed by Xining.

>
> > Tested-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> > Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
> > Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
> > Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> > Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] scripts: checkpatch: check unused parameters for function-like macro
Posted by Joe Perches 1 year, 10 months ago
On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 15:21 +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Xining Xu <mac.xxn@outlook.com>
> 
> If function-like macros do not utilize a parameter, it might result in a
> build warning.  In our coding style guidelines, we advocate for utilizing
> static inline functions to replace such macros.  This patch verifies
> compliance with the new rule.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -6109,6 +6109,36 @@ sub process {
>  				WARN("TRAILING_SEMICOLON",
>  				     "macros should not use a trailing semicolon\n" . "$herectx");
>  			}
> +
> +			# match "\s*" rather than "\s+" after the balanced parens, as macro definition with arguments
> +			# is not required to have whitespace after arguments
> +			if ($dstat =~ /^\+\s*#\s*define\s+$Ident$balanced_parens\s*(\S+.*)(\/[\/*].*)?/) {

I think '(\/[\/*].*)?' doesn't do what you expect
perhaps '(\/[\/\*].*)?'
though I don't know why this should be capture group

> +				my $params = $1 || "";


> +				my $body = $2 || "";

Should never get the || "" as the 2nd capture group is not optional

> +
> +			    # get the individual params
> +				$params =~ tr/()//d;
> +				# remove leading and trailing whitespace
> +				$params =~ s/^\s+|\s+$//g;
> +
> +				$ctx =~ s/\n*$//;
> +				my $cnt = statement_rawlines($ctx);
> +				my $herectx = get_stat_here($linenr, $cnt, $here);
> +
> +				if ($params ne "") {

probably unnecessary

> +					my @paramList = split /,\s*/, $params;

please use split() with parentheses

> +					foreach my $param(@paramList) {

maybe
				foreach my $param (split(/,/, $params) {
					$param = trim($param);
					next if ($param =~ /\.\.\.$/);

> +						if ($param =~ /\.\.\.$/) {
> +							# if the param name ends with "...", skip the check
> +							next;
> +						}
> +						if ($body !~ /\b$param\b/) {
> +							WARN("UNUSED_PARAM_IN_MACRO",
> +								"Parameter '$param' is not used in function-like macro\n" . "$herectx");
> +						}
> +					}

It seems this logic is a bit redundant to existing
code and might be better added in the block that starts

(line 6026)
# check if any macro arguments are reused (ignore '...' and 'type')

as that already does each param in a #define and
ignores ... and type