.../bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 1 + .../bindings/spmi/qcom,x1e80100-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 136 +++ drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 948 +++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 715 insertions(+), 370 deletions(-)
This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported
in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently
supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100
platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work
as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are
all found on the second bus.
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
---
Changes in v6:
- Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the
schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges
property. Added missing properties to the spmi buses and the
"unevaluatedProperties: false".
- Deprecated the "qcom,bus-id" in the legacy schema.
- Changed the driver to check for legacy compatible first
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-spmi-multi-master-support-v5-0-3255ca413a0b@linaro.org
Changes in v5:
- Dropped the RFC as there aren't any concerns about the approach anymore
- Dropped the unused dev and res variables from pmic_arb_get_obsrvr_chnls_v2
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240220-spmi-multi-master-support-v4-0-dc813c878ba8@linaro.org
Changes in v4:
- Fixed comment above pmic_arb_init_apid_v7 by dropping the extra "bus" word
- Swicthed to devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname for obsrvr and chnls.
The core remains with platform_get_resource_byname as we need the core size.
- Dropped comment from probe related to the need of platform_get_resource_byname
as it not true anymore.
- Dropped the qcom,bus-id optional property.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240214-spmi-multi-master-support-v3-0-0bae0ef04faf@linaro.org
Changes in v3:
- Split the change into 3 separate patches. First 2 patches are moving
apid init and core resources into version specific ops. Third one is
adding the support for 2 buses and dedicated compatible.
- Added separate bindings patch
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213-spmi-multi-master-support-v2-1-b3b102326906@linaro.org
Changes in v2:
- Reworked it so that it registers a spmi controller for each bus
rather than relying on the generic framework to pass on the bus
(master) id.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240207-spmi-multi-master-support-v1-0-ce57f301c7fd@linaro.org
---
Abel Vesa (5):
dt-bindings: spmi: Add X1E80100 SPMI PMIC ARB schema
dt-bindings: spmi: Deprecate qcom,bus-id
spmi: pmic-arb: Make the APID init a version operation
spmi: pmic-arb: Make core resources acquiring a version operation
spmi: pmic-arb: Add multi bus support
.../bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 1 +
.../bindings/spmi/qcom,x1e80100-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 136 +++
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 948 +++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 715 insertions(+), 370 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 4893c639cc3659cefaa675bf1e59f4e7571afb5c
change-id: 20240207-spmi-multi-master-support-832a704b779b
Best regards,
--
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:28:15PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported > in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently > supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100 > platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work > as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are > all found on the second bus. > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > --- > Changes in v6: > - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the > schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges > property. Added missing properties to the spmi buses and the > "unevaluatedProperties: false". > - Deprecated the "qcom,bus-id" in the legacy schema. > - Changed the driver to check for legacy compatible first > - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-spmi-multi-master-support-v5-0-3255ca413a0b@linaro.org Where are Krzysztof's Reviewed-by tags? Rob
On 24-03-26 14:32:03, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:28:15PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported > > in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently > > supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100 > > platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work > > as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are > > all found on the second bus. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes in v6: > > - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the > > schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges > > property. Added missing properties to the spmi buses and the > > "unevaluatedProperties: false". > > - Deprecated the "qcom,bus-id" in the legacy schema. > > - Changed the driver to check for legacy compatible first > > - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-spmi-multi-master-support-v5-0-3255ca413a0b@linaro.org > > Where are Krzysztof's Reviewed-by tags? Urgh, did "b4 send --resend" which only sent the v5 as it was before the Reviewed-by tags have been picked up. My bad. I'll send a v6 with the tags appended. > > Rob
Hi Abel, On 26/03/2024 17:28, Abel Vesa wrote: > This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported > in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently > supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100 > platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work > as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are > all found on the second bus. @Dmitry, @Konrad, @Bjorn, could you apply those patches and test an devices you have to make sure there's no regression ? > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > --- > Changes in v6: > - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the > schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges > property. Added missing properties to the spmi buses and the > "unevaluatedProperties: false". > - Deprecated the "qcom,bus-id" in the legacy schema. > - Changed the driver to check for legacy compatible first > - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-spmi-multi-master-support-v5-0-3255ca413a0b@linaro.org > > Changes in v5: > - Dropped the RFC as there aren't any concerns about the approach anymore > - Dropped the unused dev and res variables from pmic_arb_get_obsrvr_chnls_v2 > - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240220-spmi-multi-master-support-v4-0-dc813c878ba8@linaro.org > > Changes in v4: > - Fixed comment above pmic_arb_init_apid_v7 by dropping the extra "bus" word > - Swicthed to devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname for obsrvr and chnls. > The core remains with platform_get_resource_byname as we need the core size. > - Dropped comment from probe related to the need of platform_get_resource_byname > as it not true anymore. > - Dropped the qcom,bus-id optional property. > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240214-spmi-multi-master-support-v3-0-0bae0ef04faf@linaro.org > > Changes in v3: > - Split the change into 3 separate patches. First 2 patches are moving > apid init and core resources into version specific ops. Third one is > adding the support for 2 buses and dedicated compatible. > - Added separate bindings patch > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213-spmi-multi-master-support-v2-1-b3b102326906@linaro.org > > Changes in v2: > - Reworked it so that it registers a spmi controller for each bus > rather than relying on the generic framework to pass on the bus > (master) id. > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240207-spmi-multi-master-support-v1-0-ce57f301c7fd@linaro.org > > --- > Abel Vesa (5): > dt-bindings: spmi: Add X1E80100 SPMI PMIC ARB schema > dt-bindings: spmi: Deprecate qcom,bus-id Forgot to add, but please fix this in a v7: > spmi: pmic-arb: Make the APID init a version operation drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:180: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'core' not described in 'spmi_pmic_arb' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:180: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'core_size' not described in 'spmi_pmic_arb' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:180: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'mapping_table_valid' not described in 'spmi_pmic_arb' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:243: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pmic_arb' not described in 'pmic_arb_read_data' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:257: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pmic_arb' not described in 'pmic_arb_write_data' > spmi: pmic-arb: Make core resources acquiring a version operation drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:180: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'core' not described in 'spmi_pmic_arb' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:180: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'core_size' not described in 'spmi_pmic_arb' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:180: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'mapping_table_valid' not described in 'spmi_pmic_arb' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:222: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'get_core_resources' not described in 'pmic_arb_ver_ops' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:244: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pmic_arb' not described in 'pmic_arb_read_data' drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c:258: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pmic_arb' not described in 'pmic_arb_write_data' > spmi: pmic-arb: Add multi bus support > > .../bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 1 + > .../bindings/spmi/qcom,x1e80100-spmi-pmic-arb.yaml | 136 +++ > drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 948 +++++++++++++-------- > 3 files changed, 715 insertions(+), 370 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 4893c639cc3659cefaa675bf1e59f4e7571afb5c > change-id: 20240207-spmi-multi-master-support-832a704b779b > > Best regards, Thanks, Neil
On 26/03/2024 17:28, Abel Vesa wrote: > This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported > in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently > supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100 > platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work > as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are > all found on the second bus. > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > --- > Changes in v6: > - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the > schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges Why resending after few days? And why without reviews? Best regards, Krzysztof
On 24-03-27 10:23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 26/03/2024 17:28, Abel Vesa wrote: > > This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported > > in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently > > supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100 > > platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work > > as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are > > all found on the second bus. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes in v6: > > - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the > > schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges > > Why resending after few days? And why without reviews? > If you are referring to the initial v6 patchset, it was sent more than a month ago. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240222-spmi-multi-master-support-v6-0-bc34ea9561da@linaro.org/ > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 27/03/2024 11:37, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 24-03-27 10:23:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 26/03/2024 17:28, Abel Vesa wrote: >>> This RFC prepares for and adds support for 2 buses, which is supported >>> in HW starting with version 7. Until now, none of the currently >>> supported platforms in upstream have used the second bus. The X1E80100 >>> platform, on the other hand, needs the second bus for the USB2.0 to work >>> as there are 3 SMB2360 PMICs which provide eUSB2 repeaters and they are >>> all found on the second bus. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> Changes in v6: >>> - Changed the compatible to platform specific (X1E80100) along with the >>> schema. Fixed the spmi buses unit addresses and added the empty ranges >> >> Why resending after few days? And why without reviews? >> > > If you are referring to the initial v6 patchset, it was sent more than a > month ago. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240222-spmi-multi-master-support-v6-0-bc34ea9561da@linaro.org/ Ykes, you are right. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.