[PATCH] efi: fix panic in kdump kernel

Oleksandr Tymoshenko posted 1 patch 1 year, 10 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
[PATCH] efi: fix panic in kdump kernel
Posted by Oleksandr Tymoshenko 1 year, 10 months ago
Check if get_next_variable() is actually valid pointer before
calling it. In kdump kernel this method is set to NULL that causes
panic during the kexec-ed kernel boot.

Tested with QEMU and OVMF firmware.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <ovt@google.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
index 8859fb0b006d..800b85807a02 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
@@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ static bool generic_ops_supported(void)
 
 	name_size = sizeof(name);
 
+	if (efi.get_next_variable == NULL)
+		return false;
 	status = efi.get_next_variable(&name_size, &name, &guid);
 	if (status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED)
 		return false;
-- 
2.44.0.396.g6e790dbe36-goog
Re: [PATCH] efi: fix panic in kdump kernel
Posted by Johan Hovold 1 year, 10 months ago
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 01:08:45AM +0000, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
> Check if get_next_variable() is actually valid pointer before
> calling it. In kdump kernel this method is set to NULL that causes
> panic during the kexec-ed kernel boot.
> 
> Tested with QEMU and OVMF firmware.

Sounds like you want a Fixes and CC stable tag here as well.

> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <ovt@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index 8859fb0b006d..800b85807a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ static bool generic_ops_supported(void)
>  
>  	name_size = sizeof(name);
>  
> +	if (efi.get_next_variable == NULL)
> +		return false;

Please move this check above the name_size initialisation and make sure
you have a new line before and after.

I'd also suggest rewriting this as:

	if (!efi.get_next_variable)
		return false;

>  	status = efi.get_next_variable(&name_size, &name, &guid);
>  	if (status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED)
>  		return false;

Johan