Enable this message for verbose debugging only as it is otherwise
printed after every AUX message, quickly filling the log buffer.

Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
index a0606fab0e22..98a32e6a0459 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ zynqmp_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
 					       msg->buffer, msg->size,
 					       &msg->reply);
 		if (!ret) {
-			dev_dbg(dp->dev, "aux %d retries\n", i);
+			dev_vdbg(dp->dev, "aux %d retries\n", i);
 			return msg->size;
 		}
 
-- 
2.35.1.1320.gc452695387.dirty

On 20/03/2024 00:51, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Enable this message for verbose debugging only as it is otherwise
> printed after every AUX message, quickly filling the log buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
> index a0606fab0e22..98a32e6a0459 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_dp.c
> @@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@ zynqmp_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
>   					       msg->buffer, msg->size,
>   					       &msg->reply);
>   		if (!ret) {
> -			dev_dbg(dp->dev, "aux %d retries\n", i);
> +			dev_vdbg(dp->dev, "aux %d retries\n", i);
>   			return msg->size;
>   		}
>   

Yes, these are annoying... In my work branch I had added "if (i)" there, 
so that this is only printed if there actually are retries.

But this is fine too (or even dropping the print totally), so:

Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>

  Tomi