From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Since pin control provides a generic data type and a macro for
the pin function definition, use them in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c | 32 ++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c
index d93640a02d1d3..79916e6bf6f4e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c
@@ -66,18 +66,6 @@ struct aw9523_irq {
u16 cached_gpio;
};
-/*
- * struct aw9523_pinmux - Pin mux params
- * @name: Name of the mux
- * @grps: Groups of the mux
- * @num_grps: Number of groups (sizeof array grps)
- */
-struct aw9523_pinmux {
- const char *name;
- const char * const *grps;
- const u8 num_grps;
-};
-
/*
* struct aw9523 - Main driver structure
* @dev: device handle
@@ -158,17 +146,9 @@ static const char * const gpio_pwm_groups[] = {
};
/* Warning: Do NOT reorder this array */
-static const struct aw9523_pinmux aw9523_pmx[] = {
- {
- .name = "pwm",
- .grps = gpio_pwm_groups,
- .num_grps = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_pwm_groups),
- },
- {
- .name = "gpio",
- .grps = gpio_pwm_groups,
- .num_grps = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_pwm_groups),
- },
+static const struct pinfunction aw9523_pmx[] = {
+ PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION("pwm", gpio_pwm_groups, ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_pwm_groups)),
+ PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION("gpio", gpio_pwm_groups, ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_pwm_groups)),
};
static int aw9523_pmx_get_funcs_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl)
@@ -184,10 +164,10 @@ static const char *aw9523_pmx_get_fname(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl,
static int aw9523_pmx_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl, unsigned int sel,
const char * const **groups,
- unsigned int * const num_groups)
+ unsigned int * const ngroups)
{
- *groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].grps;
- *num_groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].num_grps;
+ *groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].groups;
+ *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups;
return 0;
}
--
2.44.0Hi Andy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel]
[also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master next-20240314]
[cannot apply to v6.8]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/pinctrl-aw9523-Destroy-mutex-on-remove/20240314-075853
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 04/11] pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION()
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 503c55e17037436dcd45ac69dea8967e67e3f5e8)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403151827.SQgOL8WH-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:11:
In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:11:
In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:11:
In file included from include/linux/gpio/driver.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:12:
In file included from include/linux/i2c.h:19:
In file included from include/linux/regulator/consumer.h:35:
In file included from include/linux/suspend.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2188:
include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:170:29: error: no member named 'ngrpoups' in 'struct pinfunction'; did you mean 'ngroups'?
170 | *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups;
| ^~~~~~~~
| ngroups
include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h:218:9: note: 'ngroups' declared here
218 | size_t ngroups;
| ^
7 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +170 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c
164
165 static int aw9523_pmx_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl, unsigned int sel,
166 const char * const **groups,
167 unsigned int * const ngroups)
168 {
169 *groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].groups;
> 170 *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups;
171 return 0;
172 }
173
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Hi Andy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/devel]
[also build test ERROR on linusw-pinctrl/for-next linus/master next-20240314]
[cannot apply to v6.8]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/pinctrl-aw9523-Destroy-mutex-on-remove/20240314-075853
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313235422.180075-5-andy.shevchenko%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v1 04/11] pinctrl: aw9523: Make use of struct pinfunction and PINCTRL_PINFUNCTION()
config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403150648.HPQmT2Ob-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c: In function 'aw9523_pmx_get_groups':
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c:170:36: error: 'const struct pinfunction' has no member named 'ngrpoups'; did you mean 'ngroups'?
170 | *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups;
| ^~~~~~~~
| ngroups
vim +170 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-aw9523.c
164
165 static int aw9523_pmx_get_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctl, unsigned int sel,
166 const char * const **groups,
167 unsigned int * const ngroups)
168 {
169 *groups = aw9523_pmx[sel].groups;
> 170 *ngroups = aw9523_pmx[sel].ngrpoups;
171 return 0;
172 }
173
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.