[PATCH 5/7] vfio/platform: Disable virqfds on cleanup

Alex Williamson posted 7 patches 1 year, 11 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH 5/7] vfio/platform: Disable virqfds on cleanup
Posted by Alex Williamson 1 year, 11 months ago
irqfds for mask and unmask that are not specifically disabled by the
user are leaked.  Remove any irqfds during cleanup

Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Fixes: a7fa7c77cf15 ("vfio/platform: implement IRQ masking/unmasking via an eventfd")
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
index 61a1bfb68ac7..a311d70c695b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
@@ -321,8 +321,13 @@ void vfio_platform_irq_cleanup(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++) {
+		int hwirq = vdev->get_irq(vdev, i);
+
+		vfio_virqfd_disable(&vdev->irqs[i].mask);
+		vfio_virqfd_disable(&vdev->irqs[i].unmask);
 		vfio_set_trigger(vdev, i, -1, NULL);
+	}
 
 	vdev->num_irqs = 0;
 	kfree(vdev->irqs);
-- 
2.43.2
RE: [PATCH 5/7] vfio/platform: Disable virqfds on cleanup
Posted by Tian, Kevin 1 year, 11 months ago
> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 5:15 AM
> 
> @@ -321,8 +321,13 @@ void vfio_platform_irq_cleanup(struct
> vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>  {
>  	int i;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++) {
> +		int hwirq = vdev->get_irq(vdev, i);

hwirq is unused.

> +
> +		vfio_virqfd_disable(&vdev->irqs[i].mask);
> +		vfio_virqfd_disable(&vdev->irqs[i].unmask);
>  		vfio_set_trigger(vdev, i, -1, NULL);
> +	}
> 
>  	vdev->num_irqs = 0;
>  	kfree(vdev->irqs);
> --
> 2.43.2
Re: [PATCH 5/7] vfio/platform: Disable virqfds on cleanup
Posted by Alex Williamson 1 year, 11 months ago
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:16:02 +0000
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2024 5:15 AM
> > 
> > @@ -321,8 +321,13 @@ void vfio_platform_irq_cleanup(struct
> > vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> >  {
> >  	int i;
> > 
> > -	for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++)
> > +	for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_irqs; i++) {
> > +		int hwirq = vdev->get_irq(vdev, i);  
> 
> hwirq is unused.

Yep, poor split with the next patch.  I'll update the next patch to use
vdev->irqs[i].hwirq here and in the unwind on init to avoid this.  Thanks,

Alex

> > +
> > +		vfio_virqfd_disable(&vdev->irqs[i].mask);
> > +		vfio_virqfd_disable(&vdev->irqs[i].unmask);
> >  		vfio_set_trigger(vdev, i, -1, NULL);
> > +	}
> > 
> >  	vdev->num_irqs = 0;
> >  	kfree(vdev->irqs);
> > --
> > 2.43.2  
>