[PATCH net-next v3 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error interrupts unmasking

Parthiban Veerasooran posted 12 patches 1 year, 9 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH net-next v3 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error interrupts unmasking
Posted by Parthiban Veerasooran 1 year, 9 months ago
This will unmask the following error interrupts from the MAC-PHY.
  tx protocol error
  rx buffer overflow error
  loss of frame error
  header error
The MAC-PHY will signal an error by setting the EXST bit in the receive
data footer which will then allow the host to read the STATUS0 register
find the source of the error.

Signed-off-by: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c
index e9ddc4ff7d0d..f8593b793291 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/oa_tc6.c
@@ -18,6 +18,13 @@
 #define OA_TC6_REG_STATUS0			0x0008
 #define STATUS0_RESETC				BIT(6)	/* Reset Complete */
 
+/* Interrupt Mask Register #0 */
+#define OA_TC6_REG_INT_MASK0			0x000C
+#define INT_MASK0_HEADER_ERR_MASK		BIT(5)
+#define INT_MASK0_LOSS_OF_FRAME_ERR_MASK	BIT(4)
+#define INT_MASK0_RX_BUFFER_OVERFLOW_ERR_MASK	BIT(3)
+#define INT_MASK0_TX_PROTOCOL_ERR_MASK		BIT(0)
+
 /* Control command header */
 #define OA_TC6_CTRL_HEADER_DATA_NOT_CTRL	BIT(31)
 #define OA_TC6_CTRL_HEADER_WRITE		BIT(29)
@@ -324,6 +331,23 @@ static int oa_tc6_sw_reset_macphy(struct oa_tc6 *tc6)
 	return oa_tc6_write_register(tc6, OA_TC6_REG_STATUS0, regval);
 }
 
+static int oa_tc6_unmask_macphy_error_interrupts(struct oa_tc6 *tc6)
+{
+	u32 regval;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = oa_tc6_read_register(tc6, OA_TC6_REG_INT_MASK0, &regval);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	regval &= ~(INT_MASK0_TX_PROTOCOL_ERR_MASK |
+		    INT_MASK0_RX_BUFFER_OVERFLOW_ERR_MASK |
+		    INT_MASK0_LOSS_OF_FRAME_ERR_MASK |
+		    INT_MASK0_HEADER_ERR_MASK);
+
+	return oa_tc6_write_register(tc6, OA_TC6_REG_INT_MASK0, regval);
+}
+
 /**
  * oa_tc6_init - allocates and initializes oa_tc6 structure.
  * @spi: device with which data will be exchanged.
@@ -364,6 +388,13 @@ struct oa_tc6 *oa_tc6_init(struct spi_device *spi)
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
+	ret = oa_tc6_unmask_macphy_error_interrupts(tc6);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&tc6->spi->dev,
+			"MAC-PHY error interrupts unmask failed: %d\n", ret);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	return tc6;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oa_tc6_init);
-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error interrupts unmasking
Posted by Andrew Lunn 1 year, 9 months ago
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:20:10PM +0530, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
> This will unmask the following error interrupts from the MAC-PHY.
>   tx protocol error
>   rx buffer overflow error
>   loss of frame error

The standard seems to call it "Loss of framing". To me as a network
person, a frame is an L2 Ethernet packet. However, framing is
something completely different, being able to synchronise a bitstream
with some sort of markers, e.g. E1 to know where the 32 slots are.

In this context, we are not talking about packets, but the SPI bit
stream. So it would be good to use framing, not frame.

	Andrew
Re: [PATCH net-next v3 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error interrupts unmasking
Posted by Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com 1 year, 9 months ago
Hi Andrew,

On 07/03/24 6:13 am, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 02:20:10PM +0530, Parthiban Veerasooran wrote:
>> This will unmask the following error interrupts from the MAC-PHY.
>>    tx protocol error
>>    rx buffer overflow error
>>    loss of frame error
> 
> The standard seems to call it "Loss of framing". To me as a network
> person, a frame is an L2 Ethernet packet. However, framing is
> something completely different, being able to synchronise a bitstream
> with some sort of markers, e.g. E1 to know where the 32 slots are.
> 
> In this context, we are not talking about packets, but the SPI bit
> stream. So it would be good to use framing, not frame.
Yes you are right. The specification also says the same thing as you 
said "Loss of Framing Error". I will correct it in the next version.

Best regards,
Parthiban V
> 
>          Andrew
>