linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the mm-nonmm-stable tree

Stephen Rothwell posted 1 patch 1 year, 11 months ago
linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the mm-nonmm-stable tree
Posted by Stephen Rothwell 1 year, 11 months ago
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rust tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/process/changes.rst

between commit:

  9c1b86f8ce04 ("kbuild: raise the minimum supported version of LLVM to 13.0.1")

from the mm-nonmm-stable tree and commits:

  c5fed8ce6549 ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.75.0")
  768409cff6cc ("rust: upgrade to Rust 1.76.0")

from the rust tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Documentation/process/changes.rst
index 6391e7805355,c78ecc1e176f..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/process/changes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/changes.rst
@@@ -30,8 -30,8 +30,8 @@@ you probably needn't concern yourself w
          Program        Minimal version       Command to check the version
  ====================== ===============  ========================================
  GNU C                  5.1              gcc --version
 -Clang/LLVM (optional)  11.0.0           clang --version
 +Clang/LLVM (optional)  13.0.1           clang --version
- Rust (optional)        1.74.1           rustc --version
+ Rust (optional)        1.76.0           rustc --version
  bindgen (optional)     0.65.1           bindgen --version
  GNU make               3.82             make --version
  bash                   4.2              bash --version
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the mm-nonmm-stable tree
Posted by Miguel Ojeda 1 year, 11 months ago
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:33 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This

The resolution looks good -- thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel