Additional event testing using the cxl-event.h header revealed that it
did not include the correct headers for the types used.  Compile errors
such as:

	include/linux/cxl-event.h|11 col 9| error: unknown type name ‘u8’

... were seen.

Add the correct pre-requisite headers.

Omit the fixes tag because this does not cause any issues until the
header is used again in other code.

Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/cxl-event.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/cxl-event.h b/include/linux/cxl-event.h
index 03fa6d50d46f..812ed16ffc2f 100644
--- a/include/linux/cxl-event.h
+++ b/include/linux/cxl-event.h
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_CXL_EVENT_H
 #define _LINUX_CXL_EVENT_H
 
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/uuid.h>
+
 /*
  * Common Event Record Format
  * CXL rev 3.0 section 8.2.9.2.1; Table 8-42

-- 
2.43.0

Ira Weiny wrote:
> Additional event testing using the cxl-event.h header revealed that it
> did not include the correct headers for the types used.  Compile errors
> such as:
> 
> 	include/linux/cxl-event.h|11 col 9| error: unknown type name ‘u8’
> 
> ... were seen.

Were seen where? Should this have the trio of Reported-by: Closes: and
Fixes tags?

Dan Williams wrote:
> Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Additional event testing using the cxl-event.h header revealed that it
> > did not include the correct headers for the types used.  Compile errors
> > such as:
> > 
> > 	include/linux/cxl-event.h|11 col 9| error: unknown type name ‘u8’
> > 
> > ... were seen.
> 
> Were seen where? Should this have the trio of Reported-by: Closes: and
> Fixes tags?

As I said after this in the commit message:

	"Omit the fixes tag because this does not cause any issues until
	the header is used again in other code."

I'll clarify it was seen when I used cxl-event.h in the testing code and
this happened.

Ira