fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
The SLAB_MEM_SPREAD flag is already a no-op as of 6.8-rc1, remove
its usage so we can delete it from slab. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
---
fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c b/fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c
index e6e2a2185e7c..42e03b6b1cc7 100644
--- a/fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/freevxfs/vxfs_super.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ vxfs_init(void)
vxfs_inode_cachep = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("vxfs_inode",
sizeof(struct vxfs_inode_info), 0,
- SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT|SLAB_MEM_SPREAD,
+ SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT,
offsetof(struct vxfs_inode_info, vii_immed.vi_immed),
sizeof_field(struct vxfs_inode_info,
vii_immed.vi_immed),
--
2.40.1
Please just do a scripted removal after next -rc1 instead of spamming everyone..
On 2024/2/26 18:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Please just do a scripted removal after next -rc1 instead of spamming > everyone.. > Do you mean put all diffs into a single patch, send it to all people? That is also a choice if it's preferable. Should it will go through the slab tree then? Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 06:24:32PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote: > On 2024/2/26 18:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Please just do a scripted removal after next -rc1 instead of spamming > > everyone.. > > > Do you mean put all diffs into a single patch, send it to all people? > That is also a choice if it's preferable. Should it will go through > the slab tree then? Yes, send a scripted removal of what is left after6.9 -rc1 either to the slab maintainers or directly to Linus with the slab maintainers ACK.
On 2/26/24 11:24, Chengming Zhou wrote: > On 2024/2/26 18:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Please just do a scripted removal after next -rc1 instead of spamming >> everyone.. >> > Do you mean put all diffs into a single patch, send it to all people? > That is also a choice if it's preferable. Should it will go through > the slab tree then? In case that's what Christoph means, we should exclude from that those subsystems that already took your patches. > Thanks.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.